“The prerequisite for action is the will and courage to be truthful.”
It is the Mission of World View Foundations to provide a vehicle
for open and honest discussion void of political correctness that preserves and enhances traditional European /American Culture,
History, and Traditions and corrects the record of distortions that have harmed European/American Identity through intellectual
dishonesty and political correctness.
"World View Foundations are necessary, namely for our
existence and namely for our cultural preservation and policy which must secure this existence.." Dr.
"No people live longer than
the documentation of their culture."
...And when, after
60 or 80 years we are no longer alive, our inheritance will live on in our children and our children's children. When we realize
this, we suddenly see clearly that great river of blood that flows to us through the centuries and millennia... Dr. Walter
Gross, October 10, 1934
This Site is best viewed in Firefox or Google Chrome
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS MOURNS THE LOSS OF DR. HARRELL RHOME
World View Foundations mourns the loss of Dr. Harrell Rhome, a good friend and comrade. Dr. Rhome's
wife informed us that Dr. Rhome passed away on November 14, 2013.
Rest in Peace Comrade,
see you in Valhalla.
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS
SUNDAY CONCERTS RETURN THIS SUNDAY - DECEMBER 1, 2013
New Time: 5PM Eastern / 2PM Pacific, to listen, tune in via our Concert Page:
After a hiatus of 5 weeks, we are proud to announce, the return of our Original Sunday Concert Series. Each
Sunday, will broadcast an original period recoded Concert from the Third Reich , 1933-1945.
This Sunday, December 1, 2013, we are proud to celebrate our return by broadcasting an original 1942 Bayruth recording
Richard Wagner Götterdämmerung
WORLD VIEW ACTIVISM
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS WRITES SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS
Calls for a formal Peace
Treaty with Germany
On December 1, 2013, World View Foundations sent
a letter to Chairman Robert Menendez, D-NJ, and Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tn, calling their attention to the fact that no formal
Peace Treaty exists between the United States and Germany. The letter outlined historical issues and reminded the Senators
that a formal Peace Treaty was concluded with Japan in 1952.
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS Rodney Martin, Director 1279 W. Henderson, Suite 171 Porterville, Ca 93257 Skype: wvfoundations Fax 310-775-4057 email@example.com
Re: Formal Peace
Treaty with Federal Republic of Germany
Dear Senators Menendez
World View Foundations is a not for profit education
and outreach organization. The purpose of this letter is to bring an issue to your attention that falls under the purview
and jurisdiction of your Committee.
Despite a plethora of what
can best be described as "ancillary" Treaties and Agreements with what is today the "Federal Republic of Germany,
there exists no formal Peace Treaty between the United States and Germany. Unlike the geo-political situation which exists
between North Korea and the United States (where no Peace Treaty exists), Germany and the United States by all accounts (American)
have enjoyed an excellent diplomatic and military relationship since the cessation of hostilities in May 1945. Thus there
is no diplomatic, military nor intellectually honest basis for the lack of a formal Peace Treaty between the United States
and the Federal Republic of Germany. The United States signed a formal Peace Treaty with Japan in May, 1951, just 6 years
after the cessation of hostilities, in the Treaty of San Francisco.
Some may point to the agreements, such as the General Treaty of 1952 and the Agreements signed in 1990-91 which provided
for the reunification of the former German Democratic Republic/GDR (East Germany) and the Federal Republic of Germany/West
Germany as a "Peace Treaty", however, none of those Agreements were a formal Peace Treaty but merely took up issues
relating to former occupation zones. The 1952 "General Treaty" merely transferred sovereignty from the Allied Control
Council to the West German Government in West Germany.
Dr. Frederick Toben appeared on World View Conversations on November 23rd, and
discussed "Wagner". Dr. Toben was attending the Wagner Festival in Melbourne. Today, Dr.
Toben wrote and provided these excellent photos of his attendance at the Melbourne Wagner Festival.
Note, Dr. Toben sat in Box "H", at the Festival.
Dr. Toben -outside Box "H"
Dr. Toben- enjoying "The Ring-Rheingold"
RODNEY MARTIN INTERVIEWED
Re: ANTHONY MIGCHELS ON NATIONAL SOCIALSIT ECONOMICS AND USURY ON NOVEMBER 24, 2013
Mr. Migchels was ill, Rodney Martin was interviewed on the the Radio Show Faux
Capitalism by Jason Erb. The debate should be rest in two weeks.
As many of you are aware, World View Foundation Director Rodney Martin
appeared on Deanna Spingola's Show last week and refuted a recent essay Anthony Migchels wrote which was posted on the disinformation
web site Veterans Today. In his essay, Mr. Migchels stated that Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP did NOT end usury.
Martin's appearance on Spingola Speaks refuting Mr. Migchels Essay is posted
on the World View Radio Page on the main World View Foundations web site: http://www.wvfoundations.org/id3.html
After Martin's appearance, Mr. Migchels appeared on "Inside the Eye",
guest hosted by Mr. Jason Erb. Mr. Migchels could not address all the errors I exposed in his Essay as well as the historical
At the conclusion of the interview, Mr. Erb offered
to moderate a debate between Mr. Migchels and Rodney Martin. I wrote Mr. Erb indicating I would accept such a debate and
calling his attention to the fact that Mr. Migchels had failed to address the points I had raised but instead deflected to
criticizing German prosecution of the war, specifically the German invasion of the Soviet Union, which had nothing to do with
the Pre-War National Socialist Economic Miracle.
has been notified that the debate between Mr. Migchels and myself regarding National Socialist Economic Policy will take place
on Sunday October 20th at 8PM ET and will run for 2 hours.
COMING -DECEMBER 13, 2013 WORLD VIEW
CONVERSATIONS---HOLIDAY SPECIAL BROADCAST
William Pierce as told by his brother Sanders Pierce
Martin in conversations with Mr. Sanders Pierce In an American Nationalist Network exclusive, Rodney Martin speaks with
the late Dr. William Pierce's brother, Sanders Pierce about his brother. Mr. Sanders Pierce reflects on the life and
times Dr. William Pirece Life growing up with Dr. Pirece Their childhood and formative years What shaped Dr.
Pierce's worldview What was life like at the Pierce dinner table? What early events shaped the Pierce Family's viewpoints? Who were the early influences (childhood) on Dr. & Sanders Pierce? And much, much more
Tune in Friday December 13, 2013 at 5PM ET /2 PM PT : http://www.blogtalkradio.com/american-nationalist-network
CURRENT WORLD VIEW POSTS
Friday, November 29, 2013
Hollywood producer Milchan admits double life as Israeli spy
Stories about Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan's alleged double life have been circulating for years.
Now, the Israeli-born
businessman behind hits like "Pretty Woman," "Fight Club" and "L.A. Confidential" has finally
come forth with a stunning admission -- for years he served as an Israeli spy, buying arms on its behalf and boosting its
alleged nuclear program.
In a far-reaching interview aired Monday with Israel's Channel 2 TV's flagship investigative
program "Uvda," Milchan detailed a series of clandestine affairs in which he was involved and particularly how he
helped purchase technologies Israel allegedly needed to operate nuclear bombs.
Porsche’s Nazi Past Prompts Protest in Czech Birthplace
The Czech town of Vratislavice nad Nisou is removing signs commemorating native son Ferdinand Porsche, following protests
over the car designer's Nazi affiliation during World War II.
The town of about 6,500 people will erase references that
it's Porsche's birthplace from its welcome signs, Mayor Ales Preisler said in a phone interview today. A local exhibition
of memorabilia was changed a month ago to include information about Porsche's membership in the elite Nazi SS defense corps,
according to Preisler.
Plaque commemorating ‘Nazi’ actor Heinrich George removed
On Wednesday, 16 October, 2013, a plaque commemorating the German actor Heinrich George was removed from his birthplace, the
tenement building Łokieta 34, formerly Burscherstrasse 50. The plaque had been placed on the tenement as part of a campaign
to commemorate Szczecinianins of both German and Polish descent, entitled ‘Niezwykle szczecinianie i ich kamienice‘
(Remarkable Szczecinianins and their tenements).
Albums taken as 'souvenirs' from Adolf Hitler's library -Sold
A French veteran made more than 10,000 euros on Friday selling four photo albums he took from Adolf Hitler's mountain retreat
as "a souvenir" in the final days of World War II.
The albums, which contain pictures and messages of admiration,
were presented to Hitler by supporters in the 1930s and early 1940s. Two of them are bound in red leather with the Reich eagle
engraved on the cover.
The books were sold at auction in La Roche-sur-Yon in France's western Loire region. They went
to a single buyer who paid a total sum of 10,100 euros (£8,440).
Does Germany have a problem returning art from the "Nazi" Period
The 20th century wasn't short of "notorious" artistic events: the riot at the premiere of Stravinsky's Rite of
Spring in 1913, the unveiling of Marcel Duchamp's Fountain, a urinal exhibited as a work of art in 1917. But one stands head
and shoulders above the rest: the Entartete Kunst - Degenerate Art - exhibition staged by the Nazis in Munich in 1937.
works by Picasso, Matisse, Chagall and a host of German modern greats such as Paul Klee, Max Beckmann, Georg Grosz and Kurt
Schwitters, it was probably the finest modern art show ever staged; except that its purpose was to provide the "ordinary,
decent" German with the opportunity to mock the debased, non-Aryan, avant garde culture the Nazis were trying to stamp
Manfred Rommel, Son of German Field Marshal, Dies at 84
Field Marshal Erwin Rommel was a hero of Hitler's Germany, the legendary "Desert Fox" who seized the world's attention
with his daring tactics in North Africa from 1941 to 1943. Manfred Rommel was his only child. He was 15 when he said
goodbye to his father, then watched as two German generals ushered him into a car. The generals had given the field marshal
a choice: commit suicide or face a rigged trial on charges of conspiring to kill Hitler. If he chose the trial, they said,
they could not promise that his family would be safe.
The name Cornelius Gurlitt has hit the headlines recently after the discovery of a massive art collection in his Munich apartment.
His art dealer father Hildebrand offered a fascinating insight into his love of paintings in a never-before published text
Almost a year before his death, Hildebrand Gurlitt (1895-1956) wrote a six-page essay on the history of his collection
that was originally intended to serve as a foreword for an exhibition catalogue. But it was never printed "for all kinds
of reasons," as Gurlitt wrote in a letter in November 1955. This forgotten manuscript, which was kept for decades in
the Düsseldorf city archives, is one of the few texts written by Gurlitt that provides an insight into the life and intellectual
world of this passionate collector. One page -- in which Gurlitt apparently describes his career as an art dealer during the
Nazi era -- is missing from the archives. Nevertheless, the surviving pages are an important source of information on the
life of this man. The following is a compilation of the key passages:
Cornelius Gurlitt hoarded art treasures his father obtained under dubious circumstances in the Nazi era. The reclusive 80-year-old
has given SPIEGEL the first interview since news of their discovery broke two weeks ago. He says the pictures are the love
of his life and must be returned.
No one had ever seen Cornelius Gurlitt in his nightshirt before, until a day in February
2012, when they broke the lock and marched in -- the strangers, as he calls them -- the customs investigators and officials
with the Augsburg public prosecutor's office.
Economic woes have led to the rise of Golden Dawn and provoked a crisis of democracy Economic collapse, mass joblessness,
uniformed paramilitaries, street violence, political assassinations and, now, a round-up of opposition MPs. Euro-wracked Greece
is beginning to feel eerily like Weimar Germany. The beleaguered Athens government has arrested five deputies and 15
other activists from the fascist party Golden Dawn, including the leader, Nikolaos Michaloliakos. The Greek constitution prohibits
the outright banning of political parties, but the authorities have got around that by classing Golden Dawn as a criminal
organisation and linking it to the murder 11 days ago of a Leftist musician. We use the word "fascist" so loosely
these days that it has almost lost its meaning. If you oppose immigration, you're called a fascist. If you criticise the EU,
you're called a fascist. If you're winning an argument with a Leftie online then, sooner or later, you're called a fascist.
Ex-Golden Dawn members reveal neo-Nazi party's 'criminal acts'
AFP - Greece's Golden Dawn neo-Nazi party regularly organised "assault militias" in which dozens of members would
ride the streets on motorbikes, hitting immigrants with a stick, according to a government report and testimonies cited in
the Greek press on Monday.
"I took part several times in activities involving 50 or 60 motorbikes, with two people
on each. The one who was sitting behind held a stick with the Greek flag and hit all the Pakistanis he could see," one
ex-member said in court testimony. http://www.france24.com/en/20130930-ex-golden-dawn-members-reveal-neo-nazi-partys-criminal-acts
Golden Dawn arrests take Greece into uncharted waters
Before his untimely death at the age of 34, Pavlos Fyssas was a hip-hop rapper popular on Greece's anti-fascist scene but
little known beyond the frontiers of that music genre or the borders of the country itself. On the night of 17 September all
After becoming embroiled in a row over a soccer game being shown at a cafe in a working-class Athenian suburb,
Fyssas and his friends were set upon by thugs dressed in the combat pants and black T-shirts worn by supporters of the country's
far-right Golden Dawn party.
Cornered by the mob, the bearded singer was soon lying in a pool of his own blood, with
stab wounds to the heart and chest. Within minutes he had died. And within hours the killer, a self-professed member of Golden
Dawn, had been arrested.
Greece plans new anti-racism law amid Golden Dawn crackdown
ATHENS (Reuters) - The Greek government said on Monday it would soon present a bill targeting racist hate speech, part
of a crackdown on the far-right Golden Dawn party after the killing of an anti-fascist rapper. "(The bill) will
be submitted to parliament in a matter of days. It has symbolic and moral value," Deputy Prime Minister Evangelos Venizelos
told reporters, adding that it would align Greek legislation with European standards.
An artificial hill in former West Berlin was once a major building site for Nazis - then a surveillance center during the
Cold War. Today, it's being restored by artists and conservationists, and welcomes visitors.
C.H. Beck: Germany's literary rock for a quarter millennium
Today's publishers are either closing or merging into weighty giants. Family-run publisher C.H. Beck, now celebrating 250
years, is bucking the trend. But trans-Atlantic talks could disrupt its comfortable perch.
Victor Erofeyev is one of Russia's most prominent dissident novelists,
with his subversive work dating well back into the Soviet era. He told SPIEGEL that as Russia drifts away from democracy,
the worst thing the West can do is isolate it.
SPIEGEL: Victor Vladimirovich, you've written quite a crazy book
about your homeland. Can only crazy things be written about Russia?
Too Much Tolerance: Pedophilia Debate Hits Germany's FDP
Germany's Free Democratic Party has consistently denied ever having supported pedophilia. But archival materials show just
how tolerant the party once was of activists advocating for sex with children.
In November of 1982, Germany's business-friendly
Free Democratic Party (FDP), today the junior coalition party of Chancellor Angela Merkel's ruling conservatives, threw a
party at the close of its federal convention. The invitations promising "disco and discussion" went out not only
to party members who had participated in the convention in Berlin, but also to a selection of gays, lesbians -- and pedophiles.
The invitation bore the FDP logo, emblazoned at the bottom right, and explicitly welcomed "Lesbians and Liberals, Gossips
and Sisters, Celebrities and Pederasts."
On June 4, 2013, Porterville, California, population 55,000, Mayor Virginia Gurrola, a committed leftist but also
a self-described "Christian" showed her true colors, like so many leftists do. The true religion of the left is
Cultural Marxism. The Mayor, on her own, without support and consensus from the other four City Councilmember and in opposition
from a vast majority of the Porterville Community declared June as "Gay Pride" Month in the City of Porterville.
Hundreds of Christian Porterville citizens crowded City Hall and opposed and move taken in the name of their City and condemned
Coincidentally this was also done in the City of Visalia and both the Visalia and
Porterville Proclamations were written by a small, vocal militant homosexual minority committed to reversing thousands of
years of Western Christian Civilization. This small militant homosexual organization is reinforced from out of town support
such as San Francisco and other large "Big City Homosexual Ghettos" where the Queer Rainbow Flag takes precedence
over The American and State Flags.
Homosexuals have become a
State within a State, bent on the destruction of traditional America and traditional Western Christian values. Homosexuals
even go so far as to often invoke "Queer Nation".
most troubling aspect of the "Gay Agenda" has been its rapid rise to "Protected Class Status" and it being
afforded unfounded and unjustified legal protection on equal footing to minorities such as "African-Americans",
"Native Americans", "Asian-Americans", et al. How did a new Class develop based solely on deviate sexual
activity and most importantly why has this been allowed to happen and what new Class will develop next based on deviate sexual
activity? Homosexuals always attempt to fuse their "Gay Agenda" with other causes or issues or historical events.
Homosexuals have attempted to compare their "plight" to the "American Negro Civil Rights Movement",
which has been strongly rebuffed by the Black Community who voted strongly in favor of Proposition 8 in 2008. Homosexuals
have also attempted to invoke the "Holocaust", which has also resulted in rejection by some Orthodox and Conservative
Jewish Rabbis, even though Homosexuals were interned in Concentration Camps, the Homosexual cause has been supported by many
liberal and Marxist Jews. Mayor Gurrola's "Gay Pride Proclamation" was another example of fraudulently fusing the
"Gay Agenda" with another issue. Mayor Gurrola's "Gay Pride" Proclamation was cloaked with a lot of "anti-bully"
language; anti-bullying has been widely discussed in the media lately, locally, and nationally. It was a poor attempt at
"bait and switch" The Mayor started out reading what many thought sounded like a "anti-bully" effort
in local high schools, but then at the end, as the Homosexuals and the Gay Agenda always does, the switch came, the Mayor
declared the month of June "Gay Pride Month". Thus the entire "Proclamation" was an intellectually dishonest
as is the entire "Gay Agenda". The Homosexual's success in convincing nearly half of the public that they are
a "Class" is the result of two primary elements, heavy handed political pressure by liberals and Cultural Marxists
AND Madison Avenue marketing designed to tug on the heart strings while the violin plays that soft music in hops that the
public ignores logic, reason, morality, and thousands of years of Western Christian Values and Social Norms.
The fundamental aspect of the Homosexual argument that they are entitled to special
Class Status akin to other groups who are afforded such status based on Race is based solely on the Homosexual sexual act.
The American Psychiatric Association classified "Homosexuality" as a mental disorder until 1973; the American
Psychology Association classified it as a Mental Disorder until 1975. Interestingly, the World Health Organization classified
Homosexuality as a Mental Disorder until 1990. All of these Organizations DE-classified Homosexuality as a Mental Health
Disorder on the basis of political pressure and NOT based on scientific studies which all the piers of their respective Organizations
What we have today with regard to the argument
of Homosexuals being a special class is a matter of social politics imposed on society and at horrific consequences. In all
cases, the Psychiatric and Psychology Associations and the World Health Organization cited "stigma" as one of their
primary concerns when declassifying homosexuality as a mental illness. This is both scientifically and morally bankrupt as
today our society still debates the "stigma" of mental illness, yet we have NOT declassified schizophrenia or other
mental illness based on "stigma". It was only the great liberal tidal wave coming out of the late 1960's and with
it new liberal Psychiatrists and Psychologists who entered the respective Associations and the World Health Organization coupled
with political pressure from politicians who threatened to cut off various funding sources and Madison Ave. marketing that
resulted in "homosexuality" being declassified as a mental illness and patients becoming a protected Class. In
reality the patients now run the institutions.
like many others with mental disorders demand special accommodations. The world spends trillions on AIDS, based on homosexuals
demanding the world accommodate their unhealthy and unnatural sexual acts. Today, sexually confused individuals, men and
women alike demand to the use of the opposite sex restrooms then cry foul when parents take action to protect their children
from what they suspect are sexual deviants and predators. Today, Homosexuals have strong ties with child sex (pedophilia)
advocacy Organizations such as NMBLA - National Man-Boy Love Association. Few if any so called LGBT Organizations denounce
NMBLA because these same LGBT Organizations are cross pollinated with NMBLA and view pedophilia as just another "sexual
orientation". In fact some in the LGBT Community have called these pedophiles an "unprotected Class or Orientation".
The LGBT Community are often the strongest organized opposition to Child Protection Laws such as Mag en's Law and other anti-Pedophile
Laws designed to keep sex offenders away from Schools, Parks and other locations where our child gather. The LGBT Political
Action Committee long supported the Speaker of the New York Assembly who blocked the enactment of Megan's Law in New York
State. The "LGBT Community" is often the most vocal supporters in advocating for lower age of consent laws, i.e.
more liberal laws for child to engage in sex with adults, one such proposal was proposed to lower the age to 14. The LGBT
Community has been at the forefront to prevent families from seeking counseling for their own children who may be struggling
during the trying pre-teen and teenage years. LGBT activists often engage in custodial interference, using cult-like tactics
and sexual liberation enticements, during these trying times and divide parents and children and destroy families. Homosexuals
have gone so far as to attack devout Christians with vexatious and frivolous law suits, one such suit was so frivolous and
was based on two militant homosexuals demanding a devout Christian provide them baked goods, the two homosexuals refused the
age old business tradition of business owners having the "right to refuse service to anyone". The Homosexuals
have been at the forefront of the modern war on the Church, Catholic, Protestant, and Mormon. Interestingly, only Islam has
remained firm in its theology that its liturgy is not an "evolving document" and will not accommodate moral perversion.
Piers Morgan recently echoed the homosexual view point when he said "the Bible should be revised", Morgan, like
homosexuals demand men should amend God's Word and Laws to accommodate moral perversion and mental illness. All other faiths
have begun to crack under the heavy handed political pressure or based on political terms such as "tolerance" or
good intentions, which the road to hell is paved with, and reach out for some sort of dialog with or accommodation with Homosexuals.
Of course it has been the militant "Gay Agenda" that has been at the forefront to destroy the institution of Marriage.
Homosexuals did not just begin this effort in recent times; militant homosexuals began their assault on marriage in the mid
1960's. It was homosexual liberals and feminist lesbians who first advanced the concept of "no-fault divorce",
from that point on the institution of marriage began its steady decline to its in excess of 50% rate we see today.
Homosexuals and the "Gay Agenda" have proved that they do not want dialog
or accommodation; they want absolute domination of their agenda triumphant and the demise of Western Christian Civilization.
There can be no accommodation with that which seeks to destroy Christian Values.
Homosexuals have been successful through artificial means. Their status as a Class is was obtained through artificial
and Orwellian means. When they lose at the ballot box they seek solace in the court of a homosexual Judge or via mid night
legislative actions out of reach of the electorate. When you strip away the fraud, the reality is Homosexuality is a cousin
to more dangerous sexual based mental illnesses such as pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia, et al. The next logical progression,
based on the granting of special class protections to Homosexuals is that these other sexual based mental illnesses be granted
the same class designation and rights as homosexuals. Don't laugh; in Europe today, there is a legal effort underway to grant
people the right to marry their pets, yes, marriages between humans and dogs, cats and other animal species. The logic that
is being applied in the European Courts by these "Animal Lovers" is the same that homosexuals used, first in Europe,
where they achieved special Class Status first before they achieved it in the United States. Homosexuals maintain their
special and artificial and fraudulently obtained Special Class Status by way enormous political pressure. They have a lot
of leftist benefactors on the left in Congress. They also maintain it by using "Hate speech and intellectually dishonest
labels, i.e. they call anyone who opposes their mental illness a "hater" or a "homophobe", incidentally,
Mayor Gurrola could NOT even pronounce the Orwellian term "homophobia" during the reading of her "Gay Pride"
Proclamation which was written by the local extremist Homosexual group.
When Homosexuals are faced with public health statistics that clearly demonstrate as a result of their mental illness
that they are 8 times more promiscuous and have 10 times more sex partners than normal heterosexuals, they cover their ears
and all but shout "don't confuse me with the facts", denial is a classic symptom of mental illness. Homosexuals
refuse to acknowledge the public health ramifications of their sex acts; Homosexuals fought the closing of Gay Bath Houses
during the early AIDS epidemic, thus placing their sexual gratification over judgment, another clear sign of mental illness.
Homosexuals demands that all social norms and institutions be changed and or modified to accommodation the single act they
say justify them as a "Class", their abnormal sex act is itself a red flag for mental illness. Would we as a society
be so quick to change the Social Contract and accommodate a similar demand made by a serial killer, because he/she engages
in consistent conduct consistently and began at an early age, thus he is a "Class" and thus the action is not deviant
or anti-social? The homosexual says it is not about sex, but if not, then what? They counter it is about "love",
if that is the case then why do they "love" so many? Compulsive disorders are another sign of mental illness.
The time has come for our Society to cease accepting the Big
Lie that has been imposed by Orwellian and political pressure that says homosexuals are a Class of people. We need to push
back and defend our Christian values. We need to demand that homosexuals be viewed as what they truly are mentally ill persons
who need help and we need to cease enabling the mentally ill in destroying themselves and the rest of OUR Society.
Finally, we need to stand firm that any public official who acts contrary to our
values MUST be removed from office. Virginia Gurrola must be removed from office as does any official who does not support
IMMIGRATION- LOS ANGELES, A CASE STUDY
Congress continues to push for continued "immigration reform", translation,
the legalization of 8 to 12 million illegal aliens, yes, illegal aliens. This at the expense of immigrants who followed the
rules and have been waiting years to immigrate legally, like some many have throughout our history. Every day we are
festooned with "happy talk" and calls for "compassion", yet no regard for the realities of immigration
ever makes its way into mainstream media, shall we give it a try, taking Los Angeles as a test case: According to a compilation
of data from none other than the liberal Los Angeles Times: 40% of all workers in Los Angeles County are working for
cash and not paying taxes, because they are predominantly illegal aliens working without a green card.
95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.
75% of people on the most-wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.
Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal,
whose births were paid for by taxpayers.
Upwards of 35% of
all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.
Well over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.
The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.
Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.
21 radio stations in Los Angeles are Spanish speaking.
In Los Angeles County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish
out of a population of just over 10 million.
In Los Angeles
County, public policy is based on inverted logic and is geared in favor of the "illegal alien" as some sort of victim
rather than a law breaker.
Less than 2% of illegal aliens
are picking our crops, but 30% are on some form of public assistance. Over 70% of the United States' annual population
growth (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York ) results from immigration.
29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.
time has come for a return to the Immigration Policies pre-1965 before we lose what is left of the First World United States,
both culturally and economically. There is NO fundamental right to U.S. Citizenship, which has become meaningless as new
"immigrants" take the U.S. benefits but maintain their foreign identity.
David "Piers" Irving
February 15, 2013 DAVID IRVING NO LONGER
DESERVES OUR SUPPORT By: Rodney Martin, Editor/Director World View Foundations WWW.WVFOUNDATIONS.ORG
Irving intensifies his anti-Second Amendment
statements Defends the serial Pedophile Jimmy Seville's "reputation"
David Irving has done some excellent research and authored some excellent books,
IN THE PAST; the world would not know the true travesty of Dresden, if it were not for David Irving. Irving's early work based
on original sources gave us our first clear picture inside Adolf Hitler's inter-circle. However, recently, Mr. Irving has
come to a fork in the road and taken the wrong path.
Irving comes to the United States, where he enjoys the full benefits of our First Amendment, something he cannot do in his
home Country, the U.K, in order to earn a decent living selling his books and giving lectures, lectures he cannot give in
many other Nations that have barred his entry. Mr. Irving is presently staying in Florida while writing a new biography of
Heinrich Himmler which may well stipulate to some portion of the traditional holocaust narrative.
In one of his recent prior "Radicals Diary" entries, his online Journal,
he joined fellow British Agent Provocateur in denouncing our Second Amendment. Irving went so far as to infer that single
women that own firearms for self-protections are "sluts". Irving's piggish position on women is not all that shocking
given his infatuation for his young assistants and his posting of their photos in provocative attire and poses on his web
site in the spirit of Victoria's Secret advertisements, thus appealing to the lessor impulses.
I previously wrote about these issues regarding Irving in my commentary, "Can we give David Irving a Pass while
we Detest Piers Morgan". Irving's strong statements against our Second Amendment, at a time when out fundamental Rights
are under attract by Obama and his Judeo-Marxists by a man like Irving whose primary support in the USA now come from Pro
Second Amendment proponents and White Nationalists is truly shocking, if not an outright betrayal. Irving has also sold his
books at none other than Gun Shows, yet he denies this in his new Radicals Diary entry, this calls Irving's character into
further question given that many have provided first-hand accounts of purchasing books from Irving at Gun Shows.
Irving's recent anti Second Amendment statements were NOT a momentary lapse in
judgment. In fact, Irving has today, posted a new version of his "Radicals Diary", posted on his web site today
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/index.html. In this new version Irving reacts to negative feedback to his prior comments. It is
clear that David Irving is as anti-Second Amendment as Piers Morgan and Barrack Obama. David Irving makes vicious statements
and insults toward those who own firearms and takes the "internationalist" viewpoint that Americans should disarm
based on the negative views other Nations have of the United States, which is an anti-Nationalist position. This is alarming.
Irving's complete statements regarding the Second Amendment form his current "Radicals Diary" is posted below.
Additionally and just as shocking, Irving, in the same edition of his "Radicals
Diary" defends the repulsive serial pedophile Jimmy Seville. Irving struggles in his current Radical's Diary to stand
up for serial pedophile Seville's reputation. This is actually more disgusting than Irving's hypocrisy, his attack on our
Second Amendment, while cashing in on our First Amendment and his insulting of supporters of the Second Amendment a "mindless
haters", "gun worshipers", etc. Irving has been willing to take the money of OUR people; we now see how he
really feels about US as he suns himself in his comfortable Florida surroundings.
David Irving NO longer deserves our support. We should no longer buy his books, send him donations nor attend his
lectures. Leave him to the likes of Piers Morgan, Jimmy Seville and other like-minded people who we now know he sympathizes
From David Irving's Radicals Diary-Posted
February 15, 2013 Note, Irving has NOT changed his Date Stamp from 2012 to 2013 on his Radicals
Diary, thus his current entries are listed as 2012.
http://www.fpp.co.uk/docs/Irving/RadDi/2013/150213.html Saturday, January 19, 2012 Eton, UK. MORE
hatemail over guns and my OpEd about it in the last Radicals Diary. I reply to one: "If only you could see the
way the whole world now looks at the United States! It ain't pretty. I have said my piece about your country's stupid gun-worship.
History will say the same, I expect." Another anonymous American ladels out more mindless hate: America is the only English speaking country you are allowed to visit due to our First Amendment. The First Amendment is
held up because of the Second Amendment. You are attacking the very basis of the freedom you enjoy when you visit us. Using
your daughter's death, who was not killed by firearms in the first place, as a prop, is disgusting. Now the Vatican joined
the Jews, Piers Morgan and David Irving in attempting to undermine our Constitution. Stay out of America. There is a
certain sameness about these writers. "Stay out of America". How does he know how Josephine died, God rest her soul?
p.m I reply to one: Please, please look at yourselves through the eyes of the outside world. Sand Hook was a disgusting
scandal, and would never have happened if that crazy woman and her son had had no guns. Six guns including machine guns. What
on earth did she need them for? I am not going to be intimidated into thinking differently. We do not have the sickness; the
gun-worshippers in the United States do. Another gun-worshipper hurls hate at me: Looks like the anti-gun
comments have done you in. Maybe you should apologize to the American people for supporting the gun grabbers. The pro-gun
people who believe in freedom of speech and the right to bear arms were your main supporters. Remember those Gun Shows you
used to attend? I know because I know them and they will not give you a thin dime again without a apology. Feel free
to return to your third-world-overrun UK hellhole which is ten years ahead of the USA. We can fight while the gunless White
Britain's [sic] will be murdered in the street by their Jew ridden "Diversity" government and criminals. Great future
for you over their [sic] when they enslave your children and ban your books. A quick check shows he has never contributed.
He spends his money on guns and bullets, not Real History.
At 9:07 p.m I send him my now standard reply: If only you could see the way the whole world now looks at the United States! It ain't pretty. I have said my piece
about your country's stupid gun-worship. History will say the same, I expect. I have zero sympathy, and nothing in common
with, people who find phoney "Second Amendment" excuses for the mad woman who "legally" kept six hand-guns
and machine guns which killed twenty innocent infants in Connecticut.
Irving sympathizes with the serial pedophile Jimmy Seville........
Thursday, January 10, 2012 THE BBC News programmes are dripping with self-flagellation over the Jimmy Saville
case. It makes me rather uneasy, in a probably unpopular way. I do not and did not ever like Saville: he seemed over-rich,
overweening, over-oozy with his programmes. He died four years ago, and much adulation surrounded this needlessly famous entertainer
(and his desire to be buried at an angle, so that he could cast his gaze out across the North Sea). Then it began to
come out that he was the subject of allegations of paedophilia, which the BBC had for various reasons covered up. I have no
reason to believe he was not guilty of the general allegations; but I am concerned
about the posthumous hounding, this easy, cheap and undangerous witch hunt, as allegation is mounted upon allegation, piled
high, as the sensation and publicity-seeking "victims" now come forward to point their podgy fingers. In my eyes the victim now is Saville himself, dead, his reputation not just tarnished,
but ruined, with no chance of repair. This is not the British way of justice, or if it now is, it should not be. By
all means, pursue, hound and disgrace the BBC and its nasty producers for tolerating this insufferable man, paying him a fortune,
and their climate of corruption and concealment. But de mortuis nil nisi bonum: speak no ill of the dead, and somebody must belatedly stand up for that principle.
CAN WE GIVE DAVID IRVING A PASS BUT DETEST PIERS MORGAN? Rodney Martin, World View Foundations
CNN Talking Head Piers Morgan has made quite the name for himself of late telling Americans that they "embarrass their
Nation" and calling for BOTH the U.S. Constitution to be revised in favor of gun control and for the revision of the
Bible in favor of "Gay Rights". While Morgan has been vilified, David Irving has also endorsed Gun Control.
Irving wrote the following on his online "Radical's Diary",
David Irving, "Radical's Diary":
HAS been a horrible shooting incident in Newtown, Connecticut, a peaceful New England community. Adam Lanza, 20, took some
of his mother's five handguns and automatic rifles, shot her dead, and then went to the Sandy Point school where she taught
and shot dead twenty children aged 5 to 8 and their head teacher and the school psychiatrist (sic) in an hour-long rampage
from nine-thirty yesterday morning.
He was a disturbed,
i.e. schizophrenic, child, as we learn during the day. In the evening I see President Obama manfully holding back tears, of
the evidently real kind that one looks for in vain in mothers on TV news programmes begging "the killer of their child"
to come forward (when they have done it themselves).
fact Obama is as guilty as every predecessor and leading politician in this country, who has failed to address the gun control
issue. Even now they are still tiptoeing around the central problem: gun proliferation.
In any occupied country, guns were the first things the occupiers took real control of, thereby halting all killings
(other than their own). Eisenhower issued Order No.1 in 1945 making gun possession in occupied Germany a capital offence.
In Britain after the Dunblane massacre handguns were outlawed overnight.
The mighty USA (with its great ally in the Middle East), which still kills other nations' children by the tens
of thousand in the most wanton manner, now using unmanned drones as well, is powerless to control a situation where a single
sluttish mum feels at home owning five guns of her own: meanwhile, the multi-millions of the mighty Gun Lobby wash around
the gunwales of the Capitol building in Washington DC. Guns don't kill people, in this case: the lobbyists, single mums, and
their wretched mindless children do.
It will take a
really tough president, oblivious to the yelping of the gun industry, to get a handle on this one. Not in my lifetime, probably.
Outlawing all the corrupt cash lobbies in Washington would be a good start. Until then, hecatombs of children and their olders
and stupiders will have to die" http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/
I for one intend to hold Irving to the same standard as
I hold Morgan, a British Elitist snob, who comes to America to take advantage of our 1st Amendment, while calling for an end
of our 2nd Amendment, while he often tucks himself away in safe surroundings at night with the company of much younger female
company. Irving inferring single women who own firearms for protection are "sluts" is truly ironic given his obsession
for his "Assistants".
A hypocrite is a hypocrite
whether it is a Morgan or an Irving, BOTH deserve the vilification and boycott of White Nationalists.
GUNS ARE NOT THE ISSUE LIBERAL EGALITARIAN
POLICIES ARE WHAT WAS REALLY CAUSED THE NEWTOWN AND OTHER GUN TRAGEDIES Stop the deflection guns and address the
real issue By Rodney Martin
Perhaps by the
time you read this, Barack Obama will have issued the Executive Order, his Vice President says is permissible, which will
formally restrict all law abiding American's 2nd Amendments Rights. We all know the words enshrined in the 2nd Amendment and
we have, by now heard every Liberal-Marxist shrill exploit the tragedy at Newtown, as they argue that the 2nd Amendment is
"only" for hunting" and no one needs an AR-15, AK-47 or any other "mean" looking weapon or any magazine
which holds more than, say five rounds. Of course we know they are wrong, the Founders enshrined the 2nd Amendment to ensure
that that the people are the ultimate check and balance on a Government that becomes tyrannical and ignores the Constitution
and its people, something that has long ago happened in the United States. Of course Marxist-Liberals really do know the real
reason for the 2nd Amendment and their desire to "salami slice the people's rights into oblivion", a term first
coined by Lenin, is so they can ultimately enact all of their objectives, most of which they dare not speak openly of, until
AFTER they take care of that problematic 2nd Amendment.
The fact is NO political Party or figure should use deaths or any tragedy
to push a political Agenda, either pro or con, yet that is what is happening rather than addressing the real human issue of
The great failure of today's publicity
seeking "Gun Rights Advocates" is their wiliness to fall into the debate traps of the likes of "King Piers
Morgan", a Brit who is willing to tell us how to be an American, "Pistol Packing Momma Diane Feinstein", who
seeks to disarm us, while keeping her gun in her purse, "Sideshow Joe Biden" a prime candidate for a strait-jacket,
and " Commissar Barak Hussein Obama" who is on a mission to remake America into a Marxist Third World Nation.
Thus far, all of the "Gun Rights Advocates" who have appeared
in the media have allowed the tragedy of Newtown to focus the debate solely on inamment objects- "guns", i.e. the
debate that is currently ongoing is what guns and what clips will be restricted and why do we need these "mean looking
semi-automatic weapons. Not a single "Gun Rights Advocate" has given the proper reply to "Sir Piers" or
any other Liberal-Marxist, the simple answer is, "because the Constitution says I can have one".
The real debate should be on the failure of Liberal egalitarian policies
that led directly to Newtown. Liberals never admit nor allow a discussion to occur that may lead to their having to admit
that their policies are wrong, and in the case of Newtown, liberal policies have proven to be dead wrong.
The tragedy of Newtown is NOT a result of guns, but rather a result of
the failure to properly enforce existing gun laws and to properly address mental health issues in the United States. Specifically,
for years, especially since 1964, Liberals have banged the egalitarian drum and enacted polices to "mainstream"
everyone, including criminals, sex offenders, the criminally insane. A prime example of this is the liberals' success in changing
the term "illegal alien' to "undocumented worker" thus transforming a criminal into a victim requiring immediate
government intervention. The man who murdered the children at Newtown was criminally insane. Liberal egalitarian Policies
and Judges today have legislated people like him and even sex offenders as essentially victims. Liberal policies and Judges
have struck down past laws that provided for involuntary commitment and provided families and empowered families with far
more tools to institutionalize mentally ill family members before they became a danger to themselves and others. After all,
don't families see the danger signs first? But Liberals have waged a war on families since the early 1960's with a dogma that
families are to be replaced with the State, as is the case in Cuba, North Korea and other Utopias that have proven to be so
In 1957, there were 500,000 involuntary commitments
in the United States, mass shootings were unheard of. Family members, who are the first to recognize the signs when loved
ones need help, were able to sign sworn statements and work with their medical/Psychiatric professionals and thus prevent
what we have seen at Newtown, Ct, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Co and Tucson, AZ. Individuals could not be released unless Psychiatric
Professionals cleared them; in most cases it required more than one. However, in the mid 1960's Marxist- Liberals began chipping
away at this system and by the early 1980's, with the help of Marxist-Liberal Judges, had established their "new"
system whereby Families became all but powerless and irrelevant to the committal process and a Mentally Ill person could simply
talk their way through an Interview Process with a State Social Worker, NOT a Psychiatric Professional, who need not consult
with family and in most cases may last 2 to 3 minutes or a Judicial Hearing where their "rights" took precedence
over the Public's Safety and ultimately other people's Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
In an even greater example of public policy madness that exacerbates this
problem Marxist-Liberals have gone out of their way to legalize drugs, via the "salami-slicer" method, first under
guise of "medicinal use" of gate way drugs, then more recently attempts at all out legalization. No regard is given
for the consequences, and no restrictions have been proposed for the mentally ill, Washington State and Colorado recently
legalized marijuana without regard to mentally ill persons. Can you imagine the ramifications, no need to imagine, we see
it every day, of mentally ill persons in denial who use everything from marijuana to methamphetamines to cocaine illegally.
Now imagine if all of it was "decriminalized" as most Liberals desire and some Republicans are more than willing
to accommodate. Again more family destruction via official policy making.
Liberal-Marxist Dogma took and still takes the egalitarian position that a mentally ill or unbalanced person in denial,
emphasis on denial, was and is no different than any other sane person and should be treated as such and thus should be allowed
to remain in the greater populace, walking among us, even if they refuse to seek help. Society has paid a tremendous price
for this very flawed egalitarian position by Liberals as have a great many families. In fact Jared Loughner's parents made
at least two documented attempts to get him mental health care, they were turned away, James Holmes college psychiatrist was
so concerned by his conduct that she had him banned from the college campus, and in the case of the adult shooter in Newtown,
his mother was so afraid of him that she warned visitors to her home to "not turn their backs to him, not even when they
went to the bathroom", she further ran into the bureaucratic nightmare that is today's policies to obtain involuntary
committal of family members. Under the old system, all would have or could have immediately been involuntarily committed BEFORE
they carried out their respective mass shootings.
Liberals are not solely to blame for this current state of Mental Health affairs in the
United States. So called Conservatives who often call themselves "Christians", have done very little to stop this
trend of Liberal Policies, but not out of any philosophical disagreement. Conservatives have done nothing out of a more twisted
motive, financial. Conservatives viewed Mental Health as a disposable budgetary item and were very eager to end what they
referred to as "out dated" Programs for people they really cared very little about. This shortsightedness resulted
in millions of mentally ill people being put into the general population, in most cases on the streets, of the United States
overnight under the administration of Ronald Reagan. So called Conservatives who championed fiscal restraint choose
to utilize the use of the criminal justice system to address mental health issues, which on average costs $7 more for every
$1 spent on Mental Health Prevention Programs. The budgetary rationale in the end saved nothing and cost more.
Of greater concern which requires real Leadership, was and still today
is the "stigma" in "Low Information" American Society which is unfairly attached to anyone who willingly
seeks treatment for "mental Illness". A person who recognizes they have a mental illness and willingly seeks help
is vastly different from the criminally insane, yet our immature and "Low Information" American Society makes little
distinction. When a person has Cancer, we sympathize and encourage treatment, as we do with AIDS and other chronic disease.
? It should be the same for those who seek treatment for mental illness. In fact we have TV Specials for these causes, when
was the last time anyone saw a "Mental illness Awareness& Fund Drive", on live TV with all the "Stars"
manning the phones? Where is the "Jerry Lewis of Mental Illness"? If someone stepped up, he/she would surely be
crazy as the whispers would go. After his 1996 loss to Bill Clinton, former Senator Bob Dole made TV Commercials promoting
new medications to address the very serious condition of "Erectile Dysfunction", something at Bob Dole's age should
not be a priority. One can hardly find an Elder Statesman taking such a stand for Mental Health, and when someone does come
forth they are more often mocked. In fact in 1972 a Democrat Vice Presidential Nominee/sitting U.S. Senator from Missouri
(Tom Eagleton) was forced to withdraw as a candidate for having the courage to admit he sought treatment for his Mental Health
issues, so much for Democrats practicing the Political Correctness they want everyone else to live by.
In all of his "engagements" with various "Gun Rights Advocates",
Sir Piers Morgan recites the same playbook and questions, he asks the respective "Gun Rights Advocate" what gun
was used in Aurora Colorado, what gun was used in the Newtown, etc., etc., knowing full well the answer will be Assault weapon
or semi-automatic weapons. Piers Morgan is attempting to limit the debate to a common issue, the type of Gun, what has been
lost, is the question, "what type of person carried out each of the mass shootings" the answer is a criminally insane
person that fixated on killing people, and most likely going to do so, whether they had access to a semi-automatic weapon
or not. Under the system of Mental Health committal that Liberal ended, it would have been far easier for family to involuntarily
commit all of these criminally insane shooters before they murdered anyone.
The time has come for our society to cease having artificial debates whose only objective is the furtherance of political
objectives at the expense of the public good. The current "Gun Control" Debate will have no effect on crime, Chicago,
has strict gun control, yet it has on average 5 to 8 gun murders per week and rape and assaults are beyond measure and Detroit
is worse than Chicago and has equally restrictive gun controls. Looking at a national model, Mexico bans both Guns and Ammunition
and it is a battle ground and people live in fear of Drug Cartels. I for one will never live like that.
The current "Gun Control Debate" and any Marxist inspired policy that
comes from it will not address the very serious Mental Health issues we have in the United States. That is the real problem
that must be addressed and BOTH political parties must admit they have done a serious injustice to people and enact new policies
that strengthen families, provide resources, empower Mental Health Professionals, ceases using the criminal justice system
for Mental Health issues, and once and for all remove the stigma that our Low Information and superficial Society places on
people who have the courage to seek help.
Sadly, as usual
in the United States today, the people will lose as "Politicians" and "Special Interests", and "Celebrities"
continue to parade their self-importance in the ongoing "Gun Control Debate".
The United States already went over the "The Cliff" By: Rodney Martin
As I write this column, we
are days away from what "politicians" and "pundits" are calling the "Fiscal Cliff", that is
on January 1, 2013, a series of spending cuts and tax increases will automatically be implemented that will have devastating
impacts on working class Americans. Translation, everyday "Tax-Paying" Americans will have to pay for the political
prostitution of BOTH Republicans and Democrats who have sold out their respective Oaths of Office and the public interest
in favor of Special Interests. For years politicians have said one thing at election time, then gone to Washington D.C and
showed every Lobbyist and Special Interest their pockets in exchange for favors, special tax breaks, and special legislation.
The American Voter is not without fault, as they have reelected their hometown favorite while often crying, "throw the
bums out". Change begins at home, if we all voted out our incumbents, we would indeed have change.
The result of this corrupt American political system, has been one designed specifically
to prevent change and the end of the once strong American Middle Class, the end of American Manufacturing, the end of single
income families, the end of home ownership, the creation of institutional poverty and the creation of government dependence
and creation of a Third World America and an America where half of the American populace pay no taxes but receive government
assistance while the other half is required to carry the entire financial responsibility of the Nation. This is commonly known
as redistribution of wealth which is the real class warfare.
United States has long gone over the "Fiscal and Social Cliff". January 1, 2013 will merely be the wakeup call if
and when the cuts and tax increases are implemented, and i.e. the bill will have to start being paid. No longer will the fiscal
irresponsibility by the treasonous politicians, all of whom have been elected and re-elected by the American people, be able
to be hidden from any American who pays taxes, i.e. the 49% who pays. The 51% who pays nothing and receives government assistance
will see no real impact and will no doubt continue to cry out for more "Social Justice". The Democrats in the House
and Senate, as well as the President have made it clear that Entitlements are not "on the Table" for Budget reductions,
and the Republicans will never discuss the extremely bloated Defense Budget nor will they cut their welfare Programs that
benefit Corporations, such as subsidies and Tax Breaks for Exxon-Mobile.
With unemployment still truly in the double digits, when
those who are underemployed and those who have ceased searching for work is factored, there remains a critical need to address
immigration, yet BOTH Democrats and Republicans maintain the need to increase Third World immigration, both for separate political
reasons, the Democrats for cheap votes and the Republicans for cheap corporate labor. The result has been the displacement
of American labor, the reduction of living wages, and the importation of all Third World cultural degradation. One need only
see the social ills and the degrading the public school system or tour an Emergency Room after 5PM. Third World Immigration,
codified by the 1965 Immigration Act of 1965 hasted the Fiscal Cliff as Third World immigrants over-burdened Federal and State
Social Programs and have led to collapse the American Health Care and Education Systems and overloaded the Criminal Justice
Systems. Third World Immigrants were never required to fully assimilate as prior generations of European Immigrants. Third
World Immigrants brought with them, in many cases a socialist-leftist philosophy, and America decided to embrace the culture
of the immigrant rather than the immigrant having to become an American. In many cases, America has ceased becoming a Nation
and transformed into a Co-op, whereby many Nationalities come to take advantage of benefits and laws not readily available
in their own Nation. In fact, the United States has so cheapened itself, that it is the only Nation that one can purchase
citizenship for $400.00 or be a Dual Citizen and serve in the U.S. Congress.
In such desprite fiscal times, any rational Nation would be having serious discussions as to what is really and truly
needed to solve the Nation's ills regardless of politics. The United States has never had such a discussion. In times of excessive
unemployment and underemployment and the destruction of the Middle Class, no rational Nation whose leaders truly represent
the Nation's interests would seek to expand immigration, yet our President, via unconstitutional Executive Order essentially
provided a venue for 12 million illegal aliens to stay in the United States, some States, such as California provide in-State
College Tuition to illegal aliens, while charging out of state tuition to American Citizens, and also provide Drivers Licenses
to illegal Aliens. Meanwhile Republicans continue to demand more workers from Nations such as India, implying that Americans
are just too dumb, what they really mean is that an East Indian will take a High Tech job for less. Such Corporations should
be double taxed for each foreign worker, Corporations such as Apple and Microsoft.
In time of fiscal crisis, why should a Nation have an outdated and punitive Income Tax System that requires half
the population carry the financial burden while allowing the other half to pay nothing and receive benefits? Every person
in the Nation should pay something, and thus be vested in the Nation. The current "Fiscal Cliff" discussion should
be generating an intellectual discussion regarding ending the Income Tax and replacing it with a Consumption Tax on all sales
except food and medicine. Under this System, everyone, citizen or not, in the Nation would pay something, and for those who
want class warfare, the rich would indeed pay more because they spend more, the poor pay less, because they spend less. The
current Income Tax System is inherently unfair and un-American as it nationalizes every American's income. The current Income
Tax System tell each American how much of their own money they get to keep and unleashes a draconian Soviet style enforcement
System that the Founding Fathers would have rebelled against, in fact the current tactics employed by the IRS make George
III look like a Choir Boy. Under the current Income Tax System, every dollar taken in by the income Tax System only
accounts for about half the Nation's budget, the remaining half is paid via loans, Treasury Bills, more often than not by
Communist China. Why should we have to borrow from the Communist Chinese because we have a unfair and punitive Tax System
that allows half the populace to not pay anything?
United States has long ago gone over the Cliff in terms of BOTH Fiscal and Social Policy. What the politicians in Washington
are really worried about is that they have run out of smoke & mirrors to hide the real effects from the American people.
Come January 1, 2013, every taxpaying American will experience first-hand, the political Sodom & Gomorra that has been
Washington D.C. for years as millions of Americans are forced to pay hundreds and thousands more and taxes for freebees which
they received no benefit. Maybe then we will some real American spirit, but I will not hold my breath. After all. There is
a Pay Day Loan shack on every corner now. Editor's Note: This Column was written on December 28, 2012.
IS THE "NORTH AMERICAN NEW RIGHT" REALLY
Rodney Martin, Director World
September 20, 2012
There is an ongoing discussion within White Nationalist and Revisionist circles regarding a new Cabal which identifies
itself as the "North American New Right". For some, who identify as this "North American New Right", this
is an attempt to create a "Big Tent" and cast away the so called boogie-men and stereotypes of the past, i.e., neo
Nazis, Revisionists, et. al. The "North American New Right" self-identifies themselves as intellectuals, and are
indeed well spoken, professional, highly educated, and their writings are well presented, even when they regurgitate or usurp
the Greats who they seek to "step over".
problem and flaw with this so called "North American New Right" is it is in reality a rebranded "New Left"
when its layers are peeled away and its positions, what few that can be found, are revealed. In fact this "North American
New Right" has failed to propose anything as comprehensive of a Worldview such as National Socialism, which the "North
American New Right" criticizes as totalitarian and having engaged in genocide. However unlike the "North American
New Right", National Socialism and even Fascism to a lesser extent was a broad based Worldview in terms of culture, arts,
science, health and education.
The current state of America's
and Europe's destruction has come primarily from the halls of academia and intellectuals, and those who have engaged in "meaningful
research and publishing that have damaged the traditional culture and social norms of our society. Interestingly, "the
North American New Right" sees little to no value in historical Revisionism which seeks to right these wrongs and has
resulted in tremendous sacrifices by many writers, publishers, speakers, and researchers.
The combination of leftist-academia and political libertarianism which calls for absolute freedom to do what one
wants when one wants, and in some cases, to whom one wants, which is essentially anarchy, is the basis of what this "North
American New Right" really is. It is NOT Nationalism, and is definitely not racial Nationalism. A vast majority of the
"North American New Right's" academic Commissars are indeed leftist-Libertarians when one really reads and listens
to what they say and what they write and look into their historical emphasis areas. This is further affirmed by many of the
" North American New Right's "positions on issues, ones that can be found or they have written about, that are in
absolute conflict with fundamental precepts of fundamental Nationalism.
For insistence, the concepts of anarchy and homosexuality are in absolute conflict with Nationalism and have historically
been used as primary weapons by Jews in their assault on White Western Christian Society. Likewise, the "North American
New Right's" anti-Christian slant and embracing and promotion of leftist thinkers are very telling. Beyond this however,
is the "North American New Right's" stipulation to traditional historical falsehoods (Jewish) which have been used
for decades to harm and subjugate our people, and especially our children, especially the artificial Jewish Holocaust tale,
and the slander of Adolf Hitler and to a lesser extent Benito Mussolini and equating "genocide" with these two Nationalist
leaders. These actions leave it completely lacking in credibility as a Nationalist philosophical organization.
One of the most telling examples that demonstrate this new so called "North
American New Right" is in fact really leftist, comes from a December, 2010 Essay written by Greg Johnson, PhD, who is
one of the Commissars of the "North American New Right", in 2010, Dr. Johnson wrote:
"There is nothing absurd about the idea of a racially conscious left".....,
Dr. Johnson went on to write,
Coast White Nationalists tend to be more strongly concerned with environmental preservation, healthy and sustainable lifestyles,
and combating animal cruelty than White Nationalists in other parts of the US. If Savitri Devi were alive today, she would
be smuggling stray cats into an organic gardening commune in Berkeley.
West Coast White Nationalists tend to be more critical of the workings of unrestrained global capitalism.
We are pro-labor, protectionist, pro-zoning, and pro-small business.
West Coast White Nationalists tend to be more non-Christian and to be more honest about it than other
White Nationalists. I know atheists, agnostics, neo-pagans, New Agers, and even some who have made extensive study and practice
of Eastern philosophies and religions. Religious pluralism and tolerance would definitely be features of a West Coast White
West Coast White Nationalists
tend to be more tolerant of homosexuals, bisexuals, "androphiles," and "none of the aboves" who put their
racial identity first.
White Nationalists tend to be more tolerant of drugs like marijuana and psychedelics.
West Coast White Nationalists are far less hung up on sub-racial distinctions and Old World feuds than
White Nationalists in the East and South. We tend to think of ourselves as whites first and foremost.
A critical read of Dr. Johnson's 2010 Essay is clear, Dr. Johnson is a typical
Wine & Cheese San Francisco Liberal, we all know these types of liberals, who espouse the positions that Dr. Johnson speaks
of in his 2010 Essay, but at the same time lives in Gated Communities so as to stay away from the "icky Blacks &
Browns", but they are equally contemptuous of working class Whites and moderately educated Whites and especially White
Christians. Likewise there are "uppity Homosexuals" who share these same positions and are equally Leftist/Libertarian.
Politically, there is no difference between those Liberals, and many Libertarians and what Dr. Johnson and the "North
American New Right" advocates, however they and Dr. Johnson and his "New Right" are NOT true Nationalists,
regardless of how many Devi books he sells.
Dr. Johnson's statements
in his 2010 Essay regarding tolerance or embracing of homosexuals, drugs, anti-Christianity, and his schizophrenic statement
regarding Race all embrace or stipulate to tools and ideals used by the Jew and their Marxist minions of political correctness
for decades, these are positions of the secular humanist which itself is a Judeo-Marxist tenant. One also sees trace elements
of San Francisco Socialist Trade Unionism in Dr. Johnson's Essay, which is leftist as well.
Of course Dr. Johnson's interpretation of Devi is incorrect as well. Today Devi would be far more concerned with
the current decline of Western Civilization than cats at Berkley. Dr. Johnson seems to forget her work in the Post-War Germany
for which she was jailed.
The basis of Nationalism should be
based on the 14 Words, regardless of whether one agrees with all of the tactics and history of their author. For those who
are conscience of our heritage and who are raising children, my wife and I are raising 5, there is little time for artificial
intellectual "circle jerks". White families need an intellectually honest and viable response to the onslaught that
has overwhelmed them since 1955. White families need an aggressive proactive voice that will address the historical injustices
as well as the hijacking of our religion and institutions. This cannot be done by way of stipulation, conformity and retreat.
One can go one and on about how effective Jews have used "tolerance" for issues such as and drugs, homosexuality
and the successful perversion of true Christianity, especially in corrupting White women and children.
When one looks at sheer demographics, it is not hard to understand that our plight
is dire and thus the 14 Words must be a primary objective of any Nationalist Organization. Unfortunately, the 14 Words is
not the basis of the "North American New Right", they have "stepped over" them. Additionally, the "North
American New Right" as also chosen to "step over" Revisionism as well, and thus stipulate to the hijacking
of our history and culture, one need only look to post 1945 Germany to realize the folly of that. One must seriously look
at all the true Nationalist elements that the "North American New Right" has "stepped over" or reject
in favor of a "Big Tent" whose roots stem from or advocate "tolerance" for Anarchy, Homosexuality, Marijuana,
Psychedelics, anti-Christianity, anti-Revisionism.
difference between real Nationalism or National Socialism, which I consider the only true Nationalism based on its success,
and the so called "North American New Right" is real Nationalism, such as National Socialism is not for everyone.
"The North American New Right" is making an attempt to be all things to all people which is a judeo-liberal principal
and contrary to Nationalism, in fact it is quasi-egalitarian. Additionally, the "North American New Right" totally
excludes the millions of every day working and poor Whites, the blue collar working poor Whites who are most victimized by
the evils of multi-culturalism, integration, and race-mixing, a topic which is not addressed by the "North American New
Right". The National Socialists, who have been "stepped over" by the "North American New Right",
grew and their success was because of these very people, NOT leftist intellectuals. The National Socialists were successful
not because they called for conformity to the decadence of the times, as the "North American New Right" does today,
but because they called for a return to the sanity of traditional cultural normalcy and attacked those who sought to distort
and pollute the traditional culture. This is NOT lost on the "North American New Right", they reject this because
they are really truly Left.
Interestingly, in his 2010 Essay, Dr. Johnson also wrote, "White Nationalism will never triumph
if it remains confined to the political right", so one must ask, why he now advocates for an organization
called, "North American New Right"? Does New Right really mean New Left? Dr. Johnson concluded his 2010 Essay by
saying, "But White Nationalism is the stuff of dreams anyway. So with that caveat, I think there is reason
to believe that, if a racially conscious left arises again, it will be on the West Coast." In Dr. Johnson's
more recent Essay's he has essentially proposed a new Plutocracy to replace to current one. This is a distinction absent a
difference. I will say I do agree that White Nationalism should not be confined to the "Right", but that is where
I part from Dr. Johnson, I believe both the Left and the Right should be jettisoned.
Based on his writings and spoken words, it is logical to conclude that Dr. Johnson has never been a supporter of
White Nationalism in its true form, and is not now, and his and the "North American New Right's" true philosophical
bent is Leftist/Liberalism/Libertarian. When one looks at all of the Commissars and Comrades in the "North American New
Right" one finds one thinking about the Trojans pondering that horse with its belly loaded with enemy troops. White Nationalists
must not make the mistake of the Trojans open our gates to the Trojan Horse, the stakes are too high at this juncture in history.
WHAT IS HYPOCRISY?
"ADL prints flyer's OPPOSING Jewish race-mixing and say openly that race-mixing is for WHITES. This
is not only hypocrisy, but reveals their true goals and mission..."
What is Hypocrisy? A good example is when Jews promote
miscegenation or in many cases essentially call for it mandated for Whites, especially with regard to white women submitting
to black men, but then cal for absolute protection of Jewish identity and in fact the ADL prints flyer's OPPOSING Jewish
race-mixing and say openly that race-mixing is for WHITES only.
This is not only hypocrisy, but reveals their true
goals and mission.
Gone are the days when Jewish Marxist Organizations like the ADL operates in the shadows, their agenda is now open
and they freely state publicly they goals and objectives. We must now confront this Agenda which threatens our children's
future and the future of Western Civilization.
Jews in Los Angeles hold seminars at UCLA to discuss their success in reshaping
the "racial makeup of California", Jews in Israel issue statements of concern regarding Israeli Jews engaging in
relationship with American Jews because of concerns over racial purity and we now see the ADL openly say that race-mixing
is for Whites and printing flyers extolling the evils of race mixing, BUT only for Jews.
The message is clear, the Jew wants all other racial
groups to end, they wish to see confusion and no identity, save for Jews, thus they will dominate the confused unidentified
The time has come for Whites to reject the age old game book employed by the Jew and their stooges and fellow Marxist
Fellow Travelers. When we are told "there is no such thing as race", we should reply clearly and concisely,
"tell that to the Jews". When we are told, "race is not important", we should reply firmly, then
it should not be important to the Jews. When we are called racists, we should stand firmly and reply, then so are the
Jews and use all of these examples.
The Jews are racialists, it is time we reject the double standard and be prod
racialists too. The Jews aggressively work on behalf of their interests, we MUST do so as well. The Jews attack
our culture, social norms, religion, institutions, damage our children and attempt to instill a fraudulent sense of history
and collective guilt, this must be confronted.
We must expose the Jew as he "crys out in pain as he strikes us".
IT'S THE CULTURE STUPID By: Rodney Martin
As the Presidential silly season heats up, all the talk has centered on the "economy",
or "getting "Americans back to work", or "job creation". All of this talk is essentially a Trojan
Horse designed to distract Americans from the real issue.
It's the culture stupid.
While this may sound incredible, it is true, all that ails the United States economically
is easy to fix. The real cancer on the American soul is America's cultural decline.
Since 1965 and the passing
of the Immigration Act of 1965, and other so called ‘Great Society" legislation, the United States has been on
a fast track to Marxist decadent cultural social norms. Prior to 1965, immigration was strictly regulated and based on
the National interest and American Citizenship had meaning. After 1965 and especially today, U.S. citizenship is relatively
meaningless. Peoples from all over the world make it a point to enter the United States for the sole purpose to give birth,
so as to secure "dual-citizenship" and thus secure American "benefits", they then either promptly return
to the Nation where their hearts are, obtain Temporary-AKA Permanent VISAs, or simply stay illegally, absent fear of deportation
thanks to Mr. Obama's recent Immigration Decree whereby Illegal Aliens need not fear deportation for being in the United States
illegally. In fact the United States is the only Nation on the Globe with such a liberal "birth-right" citizenship
which grants automatic citizenship by birth, even if the mother or father are not citizens. Ninety percent of all immigration
since the passing of the 1965 Immigration Act has come from the Third World; this has had an incredible negative impact on
the Culture and Social Norms of the United States which is responsible for the economic, social, and cultural quagmire the
United States presently finds itself in. One need only look at crime statistic to quantify this as well.
BOTH Democrats and Republicans made the conscience decision to change the United States via immigration policy. The Democrats
sought cheap votes and Republicans, dominated by its corporatist establishment wing, sought cheap labor. As a result of the
Immigration Act of 1965, both Democrats and Corporatist Republicans received what they wanted and the United States lost.
Concurrent with the passing of the Immigration Act of 1965, Congress passed a plethora of then President Lyndon Johnson's
Great Society Programs, thus creating a modern Welfare State that dwarfed the New Deal. Unlike the New Deal in the 1930's,
not a single 1960's Liberal Great Society Program was or has been struck down by the "Nine Ole Swine" of the Supreme
Court. Programs such as AFDC, Food Stamps, Medicare, and Medicaid came into existence within a year of 1965. For the existing
1965 U.S. population these programs were designed as anti-poverty measures and specifically designed as short-term assistance
until families could "get back on their feet". To the world, especially the Third World, these Great Society Programs
became an incentive to take advantage of the new very liberal Immigration Act of 1965 which encouraged Third World Immigration
on a grand scale, both legally and illegally. These programs gave Third World Immigrants the Marxists welfare State of their
homeland AND the lifestyle of the United States, of course they brought their cultural and social norms with them. The
results have been catastrophic. Today, while 2 million "new arrivals" are approved each year legally there are 20
million illegal aliens in the United States and 800,000 to 1 million enter illegally each year. Liberals like to call these
illegal aliens "undocumented", thus attempting to infer they are actually citizens without papers.
The fact remains they are illegal, entered the United States illegally
and by all legal, ethical and moral standards should be removed. A Nation without borders is not a Nation at all. U.S. prisons
and Jails are filled with illegal Aliens who have committed heinous crimes, often repeat offenders. Today, American taxpayers
have been forced via U.S. Supreme Court rulings to pay for the education of children of illegal aliens and pay for their healthcare,
even when many Americans themselves have none, thus illegal aliens are entitled to services for which they do not pay. Today,
it is common to see children cross the U.S. Mexico border, from Mexico, to attend schools in the United States, bussed of
course at taxpayer expense to and from the border. Today, it is not uncommon for small border Communities, such as San Luis,
AZ, to have more people with rented post office boxes in order to receive government checks, than the actual population of
The Immigration Act of 1965 imported millions
of new people into the United States for political and "business" purposes, but failed to take into account the
long term National and Cultural interests. The Congress in 1965 was only concerned with cheap labor and cheap votes, as they
are today. What the Congress in 1965 and 2012 fail to and refuse to acknowledge is that Third World Immigration brings with
it Social and Cultural Norms that are not consistent with the traditional Cultural and Social Norms of the United States.
For the hundred years prior to the 1965 Immigration Act, Immigrants were required to become Americans, i.e. Immigrants came
to America to become "Americans", had to learn, speak and understand English, as well as the laws, values, customs
and social norms of the United States. This ended with the 1965 Act. Today, Aliens come to use America, refuse to adapt to
American values and social norms and more often than not, walk out of the "citizenship ceremony" not knowing a word
of English, thus not knowing the commercial language not only of their "new" Country, but also the world. Many of
our new "citizens" come from Third World Nation were Marxism is the predominate philosophy and thus their belief
in "government solution" and generational dependency on "social justice programs". Work is not the
ultimate social program in the Third World as it was in the United States prior to 1965. Today, 49% of the American
population receives some form of payment from the federal or state government; that same percentage pays no taxes. Correlate
these alarming figures with the change in America's population as a result of the 1965 Immigration Act and thus the demand
for a "path to citizenship for the 20 million illegals" and the clever use of language such as "the Dream Act",
or "Comprehensive Immigration Reform". Third World Immigrants are actively working on behalf of the interests of
Thanks to the Immigration Act of 1965, Immigration and U.S. Citizenship are meaningless and thanks
to the Immigration Act of 1965, the United States imported millions of Third World Aliens that did not and do not share American
values and cultural norms. Thanks to the Immigration Act of 1965, the United States is on the verge of financial ruin as it
stresses to fund social welfare programs for an ever increasing population of people culturally dependent on such programs.
We have the liberals as the champions of Marxist political correctness and multiculturalism and the corporatist Republican
establishment to thank for this. Compounding the immigration issue has been the narrative hammered into the heads of
our children and the weak minded via liberal elements in public schools, the entertainment industry, pundits, and academics.
These elements saw an opportunity in the 1960's and pounced. Liberal elements proved to be both aggressive and effective and
traditional conservatives proved to be both passive and incompetent. Liberal elements, beginning in the 1960's advanced a
counter culture agenda designed to end the traditional family, replace work with welfare, normalize homosexuality, and instill
a sense of generational guilt in favor of mandatory Marxist multiculturalism in the minds of Americans of White-Anglo-Saxon
decent. This would become evident as liberal elements began to rewrite American public school textbooks.
conservative elements remained largely silent and ineffective while liberal elements took control of American schools and
transformed them into multicultural indoctrination centers where Che Quevara is respected, George Washington is hardly mentioned,
save for a rebuke for being a slave owner, miscegenation is encouraged and most recently, patriotic songs are forbidden out
of fear of "offending other cultures". Likewise, the entertainment industry went in to hyper mode in churning out
movies that are the polar opposite of James Cagney's patriotic "Yankee Doodle Dandy".
The entertainment industry, which once, produced films championing American exceptionalism and American pride, changed
focus and since 1965, has produced films designed to showcase a collective and generational guilt associated with being an
American. The entertainment industry has gone to the extreme in distorting and outright fabrication with regard to history
in order to promote a Marxist multicultural narrative. The news media likewise has acted as the entertainment industry's kissing
cousin in the destruction of American Culture. The news media, has, since the days of FDR, been not only left, but socialist
to communist in its leanings. The news media has failed to report on news stories that would embarrass its darlings and gone
to the extreme to destroy those it felt threatened the leftist-Marxist agenda, i.e. Joseph McCarty and Richard Nixon. Anyone
who dare expound "unconventional" ideas is branded as an "extremist" by the elitist news media, while
they report glowing on "new progressive ideas and concepts". The elite news media is and has been the front line
troops used in the war on American Culture. Fear of the media has been traditional conservatives' main weakness. One need
only look at how so called "conservatives" in Washington react to the elite media to understand this.
Since 1965, traditional conservatives have ceded the education of our
children, our healthcare, our Nationhood, and above all, thought to the liberal elements. How many times during a conversation
with a fellow conservative does a traditional conservative look over his/her shoulder to see who they might offend if they
finish that sentence/thought? This is wrong and proof that the thought police are at work, in each and every one of our heads.
Liberal elements have, since 1965, transformed the United States from the Constitutional Republic as established by the founding
fathers into George Orwell's Animal Farm, where "some are more equal than others". The cultural decline since
1965 is shocking:
Today, unlike 1965, as a result of liberal elements, supporting traditional family values is
equivalent to being "intolerant" or a "hater", while homosexuality is encouraged and protected. Today,
unlike 1965, public schools may circumvent parents and take underage girls to the local Planned Parenthood abortion mill;
this is called "progressive". Today, unlike 1965, traditional marriage is taxed, mocked and discounted while
homosexual marriage is praised, encouraged and protected. Today, when voters vote to protect traditional marriage, a homosexual
Judge voids their vote. Today, unlike 1965, the traditional family has virtually been wiped out; motherhood is discouraged
in favor of meaningless "jobs" leaving children to be raised in day care. Corporatist Republicans are to blame for
this as well. Today, unlike in 1965, many "American" Cities, Towns, and Communities have no Independence Day
Celebration, but do have very elaborate celebrations to commemorate holidays of foreign lands. Today, unlike 1965, government
business is conducted in a variety of languages and official documents are printed in languages other than English. Today,
unlike 1965, teachers may tell their students they may refrain from the Pledge of Allegiance out of respect for other cultures. Today, students are taught in some schools (Tucson, Az) that the United States stole the western United States from Mexico
and it rightfully should be returned or taken, this is otherwise known as sedition. Interestingly, many, if not most of these
students receive welfare payments from the U.S. Government. Today, unlike 1965, a majority of couples are not married
and a majority of children do NOT live with a married mother and father. Today, unlike 1965, there are an astounding
number of children having children, out of wedlock births and young women with multiple children by different fathers.
The economic woes American faces today are minor when one considers the cultural
disaster. The economic issues are relatively easy to fix. The Cultural issues are far harder and will take REAL leadership.
The Cultural crisis we face requires moral leadership and requires a leader unafraid of the screams and shouts by Marxist
and homosexual elites. The cultural crisis must be solved by strong moral Christians who are unafraid to tell people
that they cannot do what feels good, that American is not Sodom & Gomorra and that there is a difference between humans
and animals, animals do what feels good regardless of the consequences, Humans do not, liberals have indoctrinated a generation
of Americans into thinking that there should be no consequences for acting like and thinking like animals.
Finally, those who have created and continue to perpetuate the cultural decline
must be confronted and exposed for what they are, decedent Marxists who are anti-Christian and anti-American, andante-Family.
These elements must be expelled from our Society. Traditional Christian Conservatives can no longer afford to have timid souls
and trembling spirits and be fearful of being called names for standing up for what is right, decent and moral. It's time
to stand up proudly and be a "Social Conservative" and in the words of Barry Goldwater in 1964,"I would remind
you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice
is no virtue".
YES- THE "GAY" AGENDA DOES EXIST AND IT IS DANGEROUS By: Rodney Martin
During the debate regarding
Proposition 8 in California, many supporters of Prop 8 stated that their opposition to "Gay Marriage" was based
on the so called "Gay Agenda" and its assault on the Traditional Family and Family Values. Advocates who sought
to preserve traditional marriage warned that "marriage equality" as homosexual extremists call for, is merely a
first step to a much larger "Gay Agenda" that calls for indoctrination at public schools, special legal status for
the perverted in the midst of society, a retooling of adoption and basic family law precepts, and the eventual destruction
of the traditional family unit.
Gay Leaders have denied
these charges, but the facts prove otherwise.
Voters voted to amend the State Constitution in order to protect traditional marriage as it has been established and practiced
for time and eternity by every culture on the globe. Of course when the Gay Extremists lost at the ballot box, they ran
to a then closeted homosexual Judge, who ruled that the voters dare not disallow his sexual perversion. The case is on
its way to the Nine Ole Swine on the Supreme Court, where Chief Justice Roberts will not disappoint and will no doubt craft
a more creative ruling than he did with Obama Care in favor of the destruction of traditional marriage. After all as an associate
at of Hogan & Hartson As part of the firm's pro bono work, Roberts worked behind the scenes for gay rights advocates,
reviewing filings and preparing arguments for the Supreme Court case Romer vs. Evans in (1996).
their denials, homosexual extremists and zealots do in fact have a "Gay Agenda", one need only look to Sacramento
and Democrat Senator Mark Leno's whose sole focus is to churn out legislation to assure that the "Gay Agenda is codified
into law and is force fed, and now with the Supreme Court's recent decision, Leno may propose a Tax if California Citizens
do not comply with pro-homosexual initiatives. For example, Leno proposed, and it was passed and signed by Governor Brown,
requiring Homosexual "achievement" be taught in all California public schools. This type of revolting indoctrination
has but one objective and flies in the face of local control of schools by local school boards.
Senator Leno has proposed legislation http://www.sacbee.com/2012/07/02/4604048/california-bill-would-allow-a.html that allows children to have more than 2 parents. The purpose of this bill is to allow warped individuals
who leave traditional relationships and enter perverted same sex relationships to transfer or share parentage with their latest
sheet warmer by decree. The effect of Leno's legislation is to say who or what one sleeps with can be a parent, welcome to
Sodom & Gomorra.
Senator Leno's legislation demonstrates that the "Gay Agenda"
exists, that it is dangerous, and that it is all about perversion. It's time for Christians to stand up and be equally outspoken
and active in opposing the evil that seeks to attack our Nation, children and our families.
CONGRESS MUST REVIEW JOHN ROBERTS COMPETENCY By Rodney
Conservatives embraced John Roberts when George
Bush nominated him to replace the late William Rehnquist as Chief Justice, a move in obvious haste and not given much thought,
very much in keeping with many Bush decisions. I am an orthodox Christian Conservative, I never embraced Roberts. One
need only look at Roberts's background to understand his siding with the liberals. Roberts entered private law practice in
1986, just 19 years before his appointment as Chief Justice, a very shallow record for a candidate for Chief Justice, as an
associate at of Hogan & Hartson As part of the firm's pro bono work, Roberts worked behind the scenes for gay rights advocates,
reviewing filings and preparing arguments for the Supreme Court case Romer Vs. Evans in (1996), which Gays describe as "the
Gay movement's most important legal victory."
some 3 months before Roberts infamous Ruling, a friend of mine who is a local attorney was visiting me at my home, as usual
we discussed issues, and I told him that the Court would uphold ObamaCare and that Roberts would be America's Judas who would
officially transition America to a Soviet style Central Government System. My friend disagreed but Roberts of course did not
disappoint. Why do I make such a seemingly harsh statement, as "Roberts officially transitioned America to a Soviet
style Central Government", because it is true, that is the ramification of the ruling he penned along with his new Comrades
on the Marxist Left among the nine ole Swine on the Supreme Court. The much broader authority Roberts transferred to
the Central Government; something so far has not soaked into the minds of Americans whose retentions are two minutes or less
and remains outraged by the healthcare ramifications but should strike outrage into every American much greater than the ObamaCare
issue. Chief Justice Roberts granted to the Central Government in Washington the ability to tax choice and the authority
to tax citizens if they do not purchase what the Central Government wants it to purchase. Yesterday it was healthcare,
what will it be tomorrow?
For instance, we know the Central
Government has imposed Renewable Energy Mandates on Utility Companies, i.e. they must obtain up to 33% of their energy from
Renewable sources, now under the Roberts Ruling, and the Central Government can extend this mandate to individual citizens,
i.e. citizens must install Solar Panels so as to offset their electrical use by a certain percentage or face a tax, Then of
course we all know the Central Government wants to reduce air pollution and increase fuel efficiency, thus the Central Government,
via John Roberts decision, can mandate that every American must own a hybrid car or face a tax. There are no limits,
based on John Roberts's decision, after all, John Roberts decision said, that the Central Government can tax anything, even
if it is something that it cannot regulate and even if the citizen chooses not to do something, i.e. taxes can now be used
as a penalty.
Of course the IRS is the ultimate
KGB who will enforce these "taxes" to assure the citizens compliance with what the Washington Central Government
mandates. The taxes will be added to your Income Tax Return and of course citizens will be required to furnish an incredible
amount of new data to assure "accuracy" and "reporting", non-compliance will result in those audits, nonpayment
will result in levies and liens and worse. It is not hard to understand the celebrations by the throngs of those who
celebrated the Roberts Ruling, those celebrations represent the entitlement mentality in America which has resulted from a
retooling of American Culture beginning in 1965, those who embrace entitlement are among the 50% in America who pay nothing
into America and are the same 50% who receive some form of benefit and believe others should pay for their lifestyles and
choices, no matter how unhealthy, immoral and decadent. John Roberts has now delivered the rest of America into their hands
by handing them the most powerful weapon in the arsenal of government, the Tax Code and the use of Tax to force compliance.
This is the legacy of John Roberts, an appointment by a "Republican", not a Conservative. What is
the solution? Mitt Romeny, who enacted the first ObamaCare is making empty promises to "repeal & Replace" absent
specifics, something he cannot do without 60 votes in the Senate. What should be done is Impeachment. House Republicans
in the 1990's impeached Bill Clinton for a lot less than what John Roberts did. Likewise the House held, for the first
time, the Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder in criminal Contempt. The catch is these actions, under
guise of "accountability" have been by Republican Houses vs. Democrat office holders, and Roberts is a Republican,
or say he says. It's time for the Republicans in the House to place the interest of the Nation and the future of our Republic
above a simplistic Party label.
There is credible evidence that John Roberts has serious competency
issues and should not hold the office. Roberts has serious neurological (mental) issues and has history of seizures, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/health/01seizure.html?_r=1
Congress has a fiduciary responsibility to assure that his mental faculties are fully in order. The drugs that Roberts's may
take have serious side effects, including, drowsiness, irritability, mental slowing and forgetfulness. Roberts's rationale
and judgment and flipping at the last minute raise serious mental competency issues which Congress should investigate. Roberts
is serving a lifetime appointment, we can ill afford to many more of his irrational decisions which embrace interesting social
experiments that have long failed the test of history. At the same time Congress must convene impeachment proceeds vs.
Elena Kagan for hearing the ObamaCare Case. As Obama's Solicitor General, Kagen rendered legal Memos/Opinions as to how the
ObamaCare could be defended in court. This placed her in a conflict of interest and at minimum the appearance of a Conflict
of Interest. This again brings us back to John Roberts, as Chief Justice Roberts should have insisted that Kagen recuse herself,
Congress must ask why he did not.
"The Zionist Attack on
A free pdf Download
World View Foundations makes available of authors, writers, and Researchers who share a common World
The German Reich's lasting commitment to Christianity
- The Lutheran Church of the Redeemer, Jerusalem
The Lutheran Church of the Redeemer, located in the Christian Quarter of Jerusalem is the second Protestant Church
in Jerusalem, the first being Christ Church, an Anglican Church built and serves Christian Jews.
The Lutheran Church of the Redeemer was constructed on land given to King William I of Prussia, later Kaiser Wilhelm
I, in 1869 by Sultan Abdülaziz of the Ottoman Empire. The site was formally the old church of St. Mary Minor. Construction
of Lutheran Church of the Redeemer was from 1892-1898 by the German architect Paul Ferdinand Groth in accordance with the
designs of Friedrich Adler.
Kaiser Wilhelm II 1859-1941
On Reformation Day, 1898, Kaiser Wilhelm II traveled to Jerusalem to
personally dedicate the new church. The Kaiser entered the city on horse-back through to specially made ceremonial arches,
one a gift of the Ottoman Empire and one a gift from non other than the local Jewish community.
At the dedication,
Wilhelm II said:
"From Jerusalem came the light
in splendor from which the German nation became great and glorious; and what the Germanic peoples have become, they became
under the banner of the cross, the emblem of self-sacrificing charity."
Lutheran Church of the Redeemer has continuously been staffed with a Pastor and conducts services in German since
its dedication. There were two Pastors during the Third Reich period, Ernst Rhein, 1930-1938 and Johannes Doering who served
as Pastor from 1938 until he was arrested and imprisoned by the British from 1940-1945. The British occupied Jerusalem until
1948. Doering resumed his duties after the War until 1954.
Adolf Hitler's Church, still standing, Leonding, Austria
The Church, both Protestant and Orthodox supported National Socialist
Germany and its crusade against atheist Soviet Communism.
these letters, the writers express unanimous support for the campaign against "godless" Bolshevism. At left,
a letter is from a Ukrainian archbishop; the letter on the right from the German Evangelical Church (Lutheran).
Lindbergh, Charles Augustus (1902-1974), an American aviator, made the first solo
nonstop flight across the Atlantic Ocean on May 20-21, 1927. Other pilots had crossed the Atlantic before him. But Lindbergh
was the first person to do it alone nonstop.
Lindbergh's feat gained
him immediate, international fame. The press named him "Lucky Lindy" and the "Lone Eagle." Americans and
Europeans idolized the shy, slim young man and showered him with honors.
Before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, Lindbergh campaigned against voluntary American involvement in World
War II. Many Americans criticized him forhis noninvolvement beliefs. Lindberg was awarded the Order of the German Eagle
by Adolf Hitler which was presented to him by Reichs Marshall Herman Georing, Commander of the German Luftwaffe, in
October, 1938. After the war, he avoided publicity until the late 1960's, when he spoke out for the conservation
of natural resources. Lindbergh served as an adviser in the aviation industry from the days of wood and wire airplanes to
GUN CONTROL- IT'S THE JEWS, NOT NATIONAL
Jews have been coming for our guns. The National Socialists never did. By: Rodney Martin, Director/Editor World
often from Alex Jones to the Eunuchs on Fox News, they repeat the Jew-Speak that "Hitler took the Guns",
and "we need to defend our Guns from the Nazis". Jones and his fellow Tribe members do this while omitting the fact
that the opposite is true and that it has been the Jews who have sought to slice away at the 2nd Amendment in the United States,
much like their Tribe members did in Russia and elsewhere.
Jews in the U.S. Congress have worked diligently to disarm American Citizens. Their efforts began in earnest in 1968, just
after the Jews launched their legislative Armageddon of the 1960's, which was designed to being an end to Western Christian
Civilization on the North American Continent.
Emanuel Cellar D-NY, introduced the "Gun Control Act of 1968". This Act was the most broad based federal gun control
legislation in the history of the United States. Interestingly, Cellar also fought for open immigration policies as early
as the 1920's. Immigration policies that would be enacted into law in 1965 and would forever "brown" America. Twenty
years later, Jewish U.S. Senator Howard Metzenbaum, D-OH attempted to make every conviction of Cellar's 1968 Gun Control Act
a Racketeering violation. Metzenbaum also attempted to ban "plastic guns". Two years later in 1990, Jewish Senator
Herbert Kohl, D-WI, of the Kohl's Department Store Chain family, introduced the "Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990"
Kohl's Act was eventually invalidated by Federal Courts. In 1993, Jewish Senator Howard Metzenbaum D-OH introduced legislation
which sought to ban certain semi-automatic rifles, and pre-authorized the federal government to add various other semi-automatic
weapons to the list at a later date at its sole discretion.
1994 the "Brady Handgun Prevention Act", known as the "Brady Bill" was introduced in the House of Representatives
by Jewish Congressman Charles Schumer. D-NY and Jewish Senator Howard Metzenbaum D-OH. The Law required background checks
for the sale of firearms and waiting periods to buy handguns. Also in 1994 Jewish Senator Metzenbaum D-OH introduced the Gun
Violence Prevention Act of 1994 i.e. (Brady II). The legislation was not passed by Congress and Jewish Senator Dianne Feinstein
D-CA and Jewish Representative Charles Schumer D-NY introduced the first Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which was incorporated
into the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994", the Clinton Crime Bill.
In 1995 Jewish Senators Arlen Specter R-PA, Dianne Feinstein D-CA, Frank Lautenberg D-NJ, and others introduce the
"Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995". Spector, then a Republican crossed party lines to join his fellow Tribesmen
in sponsoring Gun Control Legislation. Specter would go on years later and switch to the Democrat Party.
In 1997 Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg, D-NJ inserted the Lautenberg Domestic
Confiscation proviso or the the Domestic Violence Offender Ban to Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997. This provision
bans individuals convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence and those under a Domestic Violence Protection Order
from owning a gun. Also in 1997: Chuck Schumer (Jewish) now a Senator from New York introduces the Federal Gang Violence Act
of 1997, which proposed to enhance violations of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into RICO offenses as well as increasing sentences
for minor gun law violations, including forfeiture of property and mandatory sentences.
1999 saw a significant effort by Jews in the U.S. Senate to restrict Gun Ownership. First, Jewish Senator Barbara
Boxer D-CA introduced the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999. Then Jewish Senator Herbert Kohl D-Wi introduced the Child
Safety Lock Act of 1999, which mandated a child safety lock with the transfer of all handguns. Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg,
D-NJ introduced the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999 and Jewish Senator Diane Feinstein D-CA introduced the Large Capacity
Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act.
In 2000, despite having
lost being in a minority in both Houses of Congress and the election of GW Bush, Senators Barbara Boxer D-CA, Lautenberg D-NJ,
and Feinstein D-CA, ALL JEWS, introduced the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000, which proposed a national firearms
licensing program. In 2001, these same three Jewish senators submitted nearly identical legislation called the Firearm Licensing
and Record of Sale Act of 2001.
In 2003 Senators Feinstein D-CA,
Lautenberg D-NJ, Schumer D-NY, and Levin D-WI, ALL Jews, co- sponsor legislation, which would extend the Undetectable Firearms
Act of 1998. In 2004 Jewish California Senators Feinstein and Boxer, and Schumer of NY, and others propose legislation
that would re-authorize the prior 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban. The legislation also sought to prohibit the import of
large capacity magazines. The attempt failed. In 2005: Jewish Senators Lautenberg D-NJ and Feinstein D-CA make attempts
to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act.
On January 24, 2013, Jewish Senator Diane Feinstein, D-CA introduces sweeping Gun Control Legislation. The Assault
Weapons Act of 2013. A bill that would ban the sale, transfer, manufacture and importation of 100 specialty firearms and certain
semiautomatic weapons. The bill would also outlaw the sale, importation and manufacture of ammunition magazines that accept
more than 10 rounds.
For 45 years, Jews, literally the same
Jews, have worked diligently in the United States to "come for the Guns", these Jews are BOTH Marxist-Liberals and
extremist Jewish Zionists.
Contrast the anti-gun
efforts by Jews in the United States with that of actual Gun Policy in National Socialist Germany. The German Weapons
Law (Waffengesetz) of March 18, 1938, which was enacted by Germany's National Socialist government. Some people claim this
prohibited Gun Ownership in Germany. It should be noted that the National Socialists came to power in 1933. DOWNLOAD
& CONTINUE READING...
ROBERT A. TAFT & HIS OPPOSITION TO THE NUREMBERG
Some did dare speak up
By Rodney Martin, Director/Editor
World View Foundations
Senator Robert A Taft of Ohio was the son of President William Howard Taft.
The Taft family figured prominently in Ohio politics. Robert Taft was born in 1889, the same year as Adolf Hitler.
Robert Taft was described as "Mr. Conservative", but should receive praise
for standing up at the time of the Nuremberg Trials and despite his aspirations to run for President, Taft spoke out against
the Nuremberg Trials in the immediate post-war frenzy in the United States.
Robert Taft condemned the Nuremberg Trials as victor's justice and for what they actually were, Soviet Style Show
Trials, Taft would even go so far as to say as much in a speech on October 6, 1946. Taft decried the Nuremberg Trials
for their being conducted under ex post facto laws, in which concurrently, the people who won the war were the prosecutors,
the judges, and the alleged victims.
Taft strongly condemned
the Nuremberg trials as a violation of the most basic principles of American justice and internationally accepted standards
of law in favor of politicized justice, in which so called court proceedings provided cover for vengeance against the defeated
Nations former leaders and organizations and institutions. Taft's opposition to the Nuremberg Trials was strongly criticized
by Republicans and Democrats, Liberals and fellow Conservatives alike. Taft's principled opposition to the Nuremberg
Trials is most likely the main reason for his loss of the Republican Presidential nomination for president in 1952 to none
other than the war criminal Eisenhower.
On October 6, 1946,
Senator Taft appeared before a conference on "Our Anglo-American Heritage", sponsored by Kenyon College in Ohio,
"In these trials we have accepted
the Russian idea of the purpose of trials---government policy and not justice-with little relation to Anglo-Saxon heritage.
By clothing policy in the forms of legal procedure, we may discredit the whole idea of justice in Europe for years to come.
In the last analysis, even at the end of a frightful war, we should view the future with mom hope if even our enemies believed
that we had treated them justly in our English-speaking concept of law, in the provision of relief and in the final disposal
But even more deplorable,
Taft stated were the trials themselves, which "violate the fundamental principle of American law that a man
cannot be tried under an ex post facto statute." Nuremberg, the Ohio Senator insisted, was a blot on American
Constitutional history, and a serious departure from our Anglo-Saxon heritage of fair and equal treatment, a heritage which
had rightly made this country respected throughout the world. "We can't even teach our own people the sound principles
of liberty and justice," he concluded. "We cannot teach them government in Germany by suppressing liberty and justice.
As I see it, the English-speaking peoples have one great responsibility. That is to restore to the minds of men a devotion
to equal justice under law."
Taft was joined at the time
from others across the American political spectrum, liberal Supreme Court Justice William 0. Douglas wrote:
"....no matter how finely the lawyers analyzed it, the crime for which
the Nazis were tried had never been formalized as a crime with the definiteness required by our legal standards, nor outlawed
with a death penalty by the international community. By our standards that crime arose under an ex post facto law."
Later, Senator John F. Kennedy, who himself had praised Adolf Hitler in a post
war visit to Germany included Taft in his book, "Profiles in Courage" and wrote of Taft:
What is noteworthy is the illustration furnished by this speech of Taft's unhesitating
courage in standing against the flow of public opinion for a cause he believed to be right. His action was characteristic
of the man who was labeled a reactionary, who was proud to be a conservative and who authored these lasting definitions of
liberalism and liberty:
Liberalism implies particularly freedom of thought, freedom from orthodox dogma,
and the right of others to think differently from one's self. It implies a free mind, open to new ideas and willing to give
When I say liberty, I
mean liberty of the individual to think his own thoughts and live his own life as he desires to think and live.
This was the creed by which Senator Taft lived, and he sought in his own fashion
and in his own way to provide an atmosphere in America in which others could do likewise.
Robert A. Taft died on July 31, 1953.
THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST ECONOMY AND ORIGINS OF
THE FOUR YEAR PLAN A SUMMARY
Rodney Martin, Director World View Foundations WWW.WVFOUNDATIONS.ORG firstname.lastname@example.org
The Four Year Plan
was not a Plan personally written by Adolf Hitler, but rather a Plan whose goals were outlined in a speech by Adolf Hitler.
The Four Year Plan developed as a result of an accumulation of economic policy in National Socialist Germany.
During the period from 1934 to 1937 National Socialist economic policy was directed
by Hjalmar Schacht, President of the Reichsbank from 1933 to 1939 also Minister of Economics from 1935 to 1937. Schacht had
played an important role in the establishment of the new Germany currency in the wake of the hyperinflation crises of 1923
during the Weimar Republic. From 1934 to 1937, under Hitler he also directed the government expenditure program on such projects
as public buildings, armaments and motorways. The reduction in unemployment within Germany to 1.7 million by mid-1935 under
the National Socialist government was an impressive achievement. The rest of the world remained bogged down in the Great Depression,
Germany started to import more in raw materials
than the value of its exports, and a balance of payments problem began to develop. To combat this government introduced strict
controls over wages and prices, which was possible owing to the abolition of trades unions. However, the balance of payments
problem continued to worsen during 1934. Economics Minister Schmidt advocated an increase in public consumption, but the National
Socialists wanted to develop a rearmaments program by 1935. The upshot was that Schmidt was dismissed and Schacht was appointed
as both Economics Minister and President of the Reichsbank. He was given, by a law of 3rd July 1934, power to control all
aspects of the German economy and currency exchange.
1934 Germany pursued a policy of signing bilateral trade agreements with other countries, especially in the Balkans and South
America. This extended German influence in these areas. The trade agreements solved the balance of payments problems, and
by the end of 1935 there was a trade surplus... CONTINUE READING THE ESSAY BELOW
ADOLF HITLER ADDRESSES THE REICHSTAG ON NATIONAL
SOCIALIST ECONOMIC PRINCIPALS
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS ANNOUNCES
The Mein Kampf &
Table Talk Study Group Sessions
View Foundations is pleased to announce a new Project which will formally kick off in late February. What did Hitler
really say in Mein Kampf and years later in his "Table Talk" Conversations between 1942 and 1944 regarding issues
ranging from Religion, the USA , Culture and the Jewish Question.
What were Hitler's plans for the future of Europe and how did he envision the workings of future National Socialist
Did Hitler change or modify any of his positions
as written in Mein Kampf later in his life after becoming Germany's leader?
These are just some of the topics that will be reviewed in the World View Foundations Mein Kampf & Table Talk
We will study and discuss both Mein Kampf
and Hitler's Table Talk and learn together.
Here is an
opportunity to learn as well as apply some of Hitler's political philosophy to today's political, societal, and cultural problems.
Here is an opportunity to learn for yourself and engage in an intellectually honest dialog with fellow participants void of
political correctness and spoon-fed brainwashing from today's
World View Foundations will be presenting a series of Group Study Sessions studying Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf and
Hitler's Table Talk.
The Sessions will be 1.5 hour each
Saturday beginning February 23, 2013. The Sessions will run from 3PM to 4:30PM Pacific USA Time. Study Sessions
will be conducted via Teleconference. Each Saturday, the Group will discuss a Chapter from Mein Kampf OR a specific discussion
from Hitler's Table Talk.
An admission- printed in an Israeli publication, so revealing, its author penned
it anonymously. It speaks for itself and stipulates what many have long stated. No longer can anyone be subjected to
vicious name calling and the infamous label of "anti-Semitic" for speaking this truth that has now been verified
by none other than a Jew in an Israeli publication.
doubt it will soon be scrubbed and all access forever vanish.
THE TIMES OF ISRAEL Jews DO control the media July 1, 2012, 11:05 am76
We Jews are
a funny breed. We love to brag about every Jewish actor. Sometimes we even pretend an actor is Jewish just because we like
him enough that we think he deserves to be on our team. We brag about Jewish authors, Jewish politicians, and Jewish directors.
Every time someone mentions any movie or book or piece of art, we inevitably say something like, "Did you know that he
was Jewish?" That's just how we roll.
We're a driven group, and not just in regards to the art world. We have, for example,
AIPAC, which was essentially constructed just to drive agenda in Washington DC. And it succeeds admirably. And we brag about
it. Again, it's just what we do.
But the funny
part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, "The Jews control the media!" and
"The Jews control Washington!" Suddenly we're up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down.
We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We've created entire organizations that exist just to tell
everyone that the Jews don't control nothin'. No, we don't control the media, we don't have any more sway in DC than anyone
else. No, no, no, we swear: We're just like everybody else!
Does anyone else (who's not a bigot) see the irony of this? Let's be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews.
We do control the media. We've got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it's
almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be "Tropic Thunder" or "Curb Your Enthusiasm,"
is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?
But that's not all. We also control the ads that go on those TV shows.
And let's not forget AIPAC, every anti-Semite's favorite punching bag.
We're talking an organization that's practically the equivalent of the Elders of Zion. I'll never forget when I was involved
in Israeli advocacy in college and being at one of the many AIPAC conventions. A man literally stood in front of us and told
us that their whole goal was to only work with top-50 school graduate students because they would eventually be the people
making changes in the government. Here I am, an idealistic little kid that goes to a bottom 50 school (ASU) who wants to do
some grassroots advocacy, and these guys are literally talking about infiltrating the government. Intense.
Now, I know what everyone will say. That everyone tries to lobby. Every
minority group and every majority group. That every group has some successful actors and directors. But that's a far call
from saying that we run Hollywood and Madison Avenue. That the Mel Gibsons of the world are right in saying we're deliberately
using our power to take over the world. That we've got some crazy conspiracy going down.
Okay. Fine. So some of that is kooky talk.
But let's look at it a bit deeper.
it's true: everyone lobbies. Maybe it's true there are actors of every ethnicity out there. But come on. We're the ones who
are bragging about this stuff all the time. Can't we admit that we're incredibly successful? Can't we say it to the world?
I'll give my theory for why Jews don't want to talk about their control
of the media.
First of all, as much as Jews like
to admit that so many of them are successful, and that so many of them have accomplished so much, they hate to admit that
it has to do with they're being Jewish. Maybe they'll admit that it has something to do with the Jewish experience. But how
many Jews will admit that there is something inherently a part of every single one of them that helps them to accomplish amazing
The ADL chairman, Abe Foxman, was interviewed
in a great article about the subject and he said that he "would prefer people say that many executives in the industry
‘happen to be Jewish.'" This just about sums up the party line.
The truth is, the anti-Semites got it right. We Jews have something planted in each one of us that makes us completely
different from every group in the world. We're talking about a group of people that just got put in death camps, endured pogroms,
their whole families decimated. And then they came to America, the one place that ever really let them have as much power
as they wanted, and suddenly they're taking over. Please don't tell me that any other group in the world has ever done that.
Only the Jews. And we've done it before. That's why the Jews were enslaved in Egypt. We were too successful. Go look at the
Torah - it's right there. And we did it in Germany too.
This ability to succeed, this inner drive, comes not from the years of education or any other sort of conditional
factors, but because of the inner spark within each Jew. Now, the reason groups like the ADL and AIPAC hate admitting
this is because, first of all, they are secular organizations. Their whole agenda is to prove that every Jew is the same as
every other person in the world. I cannot imagine a more outlandish agenda. No, we're different. We're special.
Of course, people hate when anyone says this. They assume that if you're
saying that Jews are special, it somehow implies that they're better. To be honest, I'm not really sure what the word
"better" even means. What I do know is that being special simply means a person has a responsibility to do good. I think that's the real reason most Jews are so afraid to admit that there's something inherently powerful and good about
them. Not because they're afraid of being special. But because they're afraid of being responsible. It means that they're
suddenly culpable when they create dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world. It means that things can't
just be created for the sake of amusement or fun or even "art."
Suddenly, we can't screw up the world.
interesting thing is that Jews have done so much for the world in so many other ways. They've moved forward civil rights;
they've helped save lives in Darfur, Haiti and just about everywhere else.
But that's not enough. Fixing the world physically is only half the battle.
Our larger battle, the harder battle, is elevating the world spiritually. And this is what the people that fight
with every inch of their soul to prove that Jews are just the same as everyone else are afraid of. It means that we can no
longer just "express ourselves." We'll have to start thinking about the things we create and the way we act. It
means we'll have to start working together. It means we'll have to hold one other, and ourselves, to a higher standard.
The time has come, though. We no longer have
to change our names. We no longer have to blend in like chameleons. We own a whole freaking country. Instead, we can
be proud of who we are, and simultaneously aware of our huge responsibility - and opportunity. http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/jews-do-control-the-media/ * *
*This article was written under an assumed name.
See an article Re: newly discovered cache of long thought lost letters
to Hitler here:
Today is June 22, 2012, 71 years ago today, the German Wehrmacht launched a preemptive
strike against what Ronald Reagan, 50 years later would call "the Evil Empire", and of course Adolf Hitler knew
in 1941 that Stalin, the Soviet Union and Communism was an Evil Empire.
The leftist, judeo communist elite have so distorted Barbarossa that many will never know that Stalin was massing
the world's largest (his) Army and Air Force for a massive Judeo Atheist Communist invasion of Europe and had it not been
for the German Wehrmacht, the whole of Europe would have been enslaved under Stalin's boot, the Iron Curtain would have been
at the English Channel rather than East Berlin. The German preemptive strike in 1941 staved off a Communist Europe just as
the German confrontation of Communism in the Spanish Civil War prevented a Communist/Stalinist Satellite in Western Europe
The tragedy is that in December of 1941, a Western
Christian Army had Soviet Communism out on its feet, was a mere 12 miles from Moscow, Stalin's government was evacuating Moscow,
Leningrad was encircled and the United States came to the aid of the Evil Empire against a fellow Christian Nation, just as
they did in the Spanish Civil War, American took the side of the Communists.
The rest is history, people's in Lithuania, Hungary, Latvia, Ukraine to this day still regard the German's as liberators
and celebrations are still held in their honor. It was not forgotten that German Wehrmacht Chaplains provided Eucharist for
the first time in 25 years to many citizens in liberated Soviet lands as they pushed back Stalin's henchman and unlike the
Red Army in 1944/45, there were no mass gang rapes.
History proves that the good
guys don't always win.
The following is Adolf Hitler's announcement
of "Barbarossa", the last true Christian Crusade:
people! National Socialists!
After long months when I
was forced to keep silent, despite heavy concerns, the time has come when I can finally speak openly. When the German
Reich received England's declaration of war on 3 September 1939, the British attempted once again to frustrate any attempt
to begin a consolidation, and thus a strengthening, of Europe by fighting the then strongest power on the Continent. England
formerly destroyed Spain through many wars. For the same reason it waged its wars against Holland. With the help
of all of Europe it later fought France.
And around the turn
of the century, it began to encircle the German Reich and it began the World War in 1914. Germany was defeated in 1918
only because of its inner disunity. The results were terrible. After first hypocritically declaring to be fighting only against
the Kaiser and his regime, they began the systematic destruction of the German Reich after the German army had laid down its
arms. As the prophecy of a French statesman, who had said that there were twenty million Germans too many, began to be fulfilled
through starvation, disease, or emigration, the National Socialist movement began building the unity of the German people,
thereby preparing the rebirth of the Reich.
This new revival
of our people from poverty, misery, and shameful contempt was a sign of a pure internal rebirth. England was not affected,
much less threatened, by this. Nonetheless, it immediately renewed its hateful policy of encirclement against Germany. Both
at home and abroad, we faced the plot we all know about between Jews and democrats, Bolshevists and reactionaries, all with
the same goal: to prevent the establishment of a new people's state, to plunge the Reich again into impotence and misery.
The hatred of this international world conspiracy was directed
not only against us, but also against those peoples who also had been neglected by Fortune, who could earn their daily bread
only through the hardest struggle. Italy and Japan above all, alongside Germany, were almost forbidden to enjoy their share
of the wealth of the world. The alliance between these nations was, therefore, only an act of self-defense against a threatening,
egotistical world coalition of wealth and power.
As early as
1936, according to the testimony of the American General Wood to a committee of the American House of Representatives, Churchill
had said that Germany was becoming too strong again, and that it therefore had to be destroyed. In summer 1939, England
thought that the time had come to renew its attempts to destroy Germany by a policy of encirclement. Their method was to begin
a campaign of lies. They declared that Germany threatened other peoples. They then provided an English guarantee of support
and assistance, next, as in the World War, let them march against Germany.
Thus between May and August 1939, England succeeded in spreading the claim throughout the world that Germany directly
threatened Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Finland, Bessarabia, and even the Ukraine. Some of these nations allowed themselves
to be misled, accepting the promises of support that were offered, and thereby joined the new attempt to encircle Germany.
Under these circumstances, I believed that I was called by my
conscience, and by the history of the German people, to assure not only these nations and their governments that these British
accusations were untrue, but also to reassure the strongest power in the East through formal declarations that our interests
did not conflict. National Socialists!
You probably all
felt that this was a bitter and difficult step for me. The German people have never had hostile feelings toward the peoples
of Russia. During the last two decades, however, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have attempted to set not only Germany,
but all of Europe, aflame. Germany has never attempted to spread its National Socialist worldview to Russia. Rather, the Jewish-Bolshevist
rulers in Moscow have constantly attempted to subject us and the other European peoples to their rule. They have attempted
this not only intellectually, but above all through military means.
The results of their efforts, in every nation, were only chaos, misery, and starvation. I, on the other hand,
have tried for two decades to build a new socialist order in Germany, with a minimum of interference and without harming our
productive capacity. This has not only eliminated unemployment, but also the profits of labor have flowed increasingly to
working people. The results of our policies are unique in all the world. Our economic and social reorganization has led
to the systematic elimination of social and class barriers, with the goal of a true people's community.
It was, therefore, difficult for me in August 1939 to send my minister to Moscow to
attempt to work against Britain's plans to encircle Germany. I did it only because of my sense of responsibility to the German
people, above all in the hope of reaching a lasting understanding and perhaps avoiding the sacrifice that would otherwise
be demanded of us.
With the exception of Lithuania, Germany
declared that those areas and nations were outside Germany's political interests. There was a special provision in the case
that England succeeded in inciting Poland into war against Germany. But here, too, German claims were moderate, and in no
relation to the accomplishments of German arms.
National Socialists! The results of the treaty, which I sought in the interests of the German people, were particularly severe for Germans living
in the affected nations. Over half a million German people's comrades - all of them small farmers, craftsmen, and workers
- were forced, almost overnight, to leave their former homes to escape a new government that threatened them with vast misery,
and sooner or later, with complete extermination (Ausrottung). Even so, thousands of Germans disappeared! It was impossible
to learn what had happened to them, or even where they were. More than 160 of them were men holding German citizenship.
I kept silent about all this, because I had to keep silent! My
wish was for final agreement with this state, and if possible a lasting settlement. But even during our march into Poland,
in violation of the treaty, the Soviet rulers suddenly claimed Lithuania. The German Reich never intended to occupy Lithuania,
and never made any such demand on Lithuania.
To the contrary, it
turned down the request by the Lithuanian government to send German troops there, since that did not correspond to the goals
of German policy.
Nonetheless, I accepted this new Russian
demand. But that was only the beginning of ever new demands.
victory on Poland, gained exclusively by German troops, gave me the occasion to extend a new offer of peace to the Western
powers. It was rejected by the international and Jewish warmongers.
The reason was that England still hoped to mobilize a European coalition against Germany that would include the Balkans
and Soviet Russia. Those in London decided to send Ambassador Cripps to Moscow. He has clear orders to improve relations
between England and Soviet Russia, and to develop them along lines England wanted. The English press reported on the progress
of his mission, as long as they were not silent for tactical reasons.
The first results were evident in fall 1939 and spring 1940. Russia justified its attempts to subject not only Finland,
but also the Baltic states, by the sudden false and absurd claim that it was protecting them from a foreign threat, or that
it was acting to prevent that threat. Only Germany could have been meant. No other power could enter the Baltic Sea, or wage
war there. I still had to remain silent. The rulers of the Kremlin continued. Consistent with the so-called friendship
treaty, Germany removed its troops far from its eastern border in spring 1940. Russian forces were already moving in, and
in numbers that could only be seen as a clear threat to Germany.
to a statement by Molotov, there were already 22 Russian divisions in the Baltic states in spring 1940.
Although the Russian government always claimed that the troops were there at the request
of the people who lived there, their purpose could only be seen as a demonstration aimed at Germany. As our soldiers
attacked French-British forces in the west, the extent of the Russian advance on our eastern front grew ever more threatening.
In August 1940, I concluded that, given the increasing number
of powerful Bolshevist divisions, it was no longer in the interests of the Reich to leave the eastern provinces, so often
devastated by war, unprotected. This, however, is exactly what the British and Soviets had hoped. The fact that so much
of the German forces, in particular the air force, was tied down in the east made it impossible for the German leadership
to bring a radical end to the war in the West.
This was the
goal of both British and Soviet Russian policy. Both England and Soviet Russia wanted to prolong this war as long as possible
in order to weaken all of Europe and plunge it into ever greater impotence. Russia's threatened attack on Rumania was
intended not only to take over an important element in the economic life not only of Germany, but of
Europe as whole, or at least to destroy it. With boundless patience, the German Reich attempted
after 1933 to win over the southeastern European states as trading partners. We, therefore, had the greatest possible interest
in their domestic stability and order. Russia's entrance into Rumania and Greece's ties to England threatened to rapidly transform
this area into a general battleground.
Despite our principles
and customs, and despite the fact that the Rumanian government had brought on these troubles itself, I urgently advised them,
for the sake of peace, to bow to Soviet extortion and cede Bessarabia.
The Rumanian government, however, believed that it could justify this step to its own people only if Germany and
Italy in return guaranteed the security of its remaining territory. I did this with a heavy heart. When the German government
gives a guarantee, it will stand by it. We are neither English nor Jewish.
I thus believed that I had saved peace at the last moment, even if at the cost of a heavy obligation. To reach a
final resolution of these problems and to clarify Russian intentions toward the Reich, as well as under the pressure of steadily
increasing mobilization along our eastern border, I invited
Molotov to come to Berlin. The Soviet foreign minister demanded further clarification from Germany on the following four
questions: Molotov's first question:
Does Germany's guarantee
for Rumania in the event of an attack mean war with Russia in the event of an attack Soviet Russia? My answer: The
German guarantee is broad and obligates us absolutely. Russia has never told us that it has any interest in Rumania outside
Bessarabia. The occupation of northern Bukowina was already a violation of this assurance. I therefore do not believe that
Russia could have any further claims on Rumania.
second question: Russia feels itself threatened by Finland again. Russia is unwilling to tolerate this. Is Germany ready
to provide no support for Finland, and above all to withdraw the German troops in Kirkenes? My answer: As in the
past, Germany has no political interests in Finland. However, the German government cannot accept a new Russian war against
the tiny Finnish people, particularly since we could never believe that Finland threatens Russia. However, we do not want
war in the Baltic Sea.
Molotov's third question: Is Germany
willing for Soviet Russia to provide a guarantee to Bulgaria, and to send Soviet-Russian troops to Bulgaria for this purpose
- although he (Molotov) wished to say that they did not have the intention of removing the king. My answer: Bulgaria
is a sovereign state, and I did not know that, just as Rumania had asked for a German guarantee, Bulgaria has asked for one
from Soviet Russia. I would also have to discuss the matter with my allies.
Molotov's fourth question: Soviet Russia absolutely requires free passage through the Dardanelle, and also demands,
for its protection, several important positions on the Dardanelle or along the Bosporus. Is Germany willing to agree to this
or not? My answer: Germany is ready at any time to agree to changes in the Statute of Montreux that benefit the
Black Sea states. Germany is not willing to approve Russian bases on the straights.
National Socialists! I behaved as the responsible leader of the German Reich, but also as a responsible representative
of European culture and civilization. The result was an increase in Soviet Russian activity against the Reich, above
all the immediate beginning of efforts to subvert the new Rumanian state and an attempt to use propaganda to eliminate the
With the help of confused and immature
people, the Rumanian Legion succeeded in organizing a coup that removed General Antonescu and plunged the nation into chaos.
By removing legal authority, they also removed the grounds for Germany to act on its guarantee. Still, I believed it
best to remain silent. Immediately after this enterprise collapsed, there was a new increase in Russian troops along
the German eastern border. Increasing numbers of tank and parachute divisions threatened the German border. The German army,
and the German homeland, know that until a few weeks ago, there was not a single German tank or motorized division on our
eastern border. If anyone needed final proof of the carefully hidden coalition between England and Soviet Russia, the
conflict in Yugoslavia provided it. While I was making a last attempt to keep peace in the Balkans, and in agreement with
the Duce invited Yugoslavia to join the Three Power Pact, England and Soviet Russia organized a coup that toppled the government
that was ready for such an agreement.
The German people can
now be told that the Serbian coup against Germany was under both the English and Soviet Russian flags. Since we were silent,
the Soviet Russian government went a step further. Not only did they organize a Putsch, but signed a treaty of friendship
with their new lackeys a few days later that was intended to strengthen Serbia's resistance to peace in the Balkans, and turn
it against Germany. It was no platonic effort, either.
demanded that the Serbian army mobilize. Since I still believed that it was better not to speak, the rulers of the Kremlin
took a further step. The German government now possesses documents that prove that, to bring Serbia into the battle,
Russia promised to provide it with weapons, airplanes, ammunition, and other war material through Salonika. That happened
at almost the same moment that I was giving the Japanese Foreign Minister Dr. Matsuoka the advice to maintain good relations
with Russia, in the hope of maintaining peace.
Only the rapid
breakthrough of our incomparable divisions into Skopje and the capture of Salonika prevented the realization of this Soviet
Russian-Anglo-Saxon plot. Serbian air force officers, however, fled to Russia and were immediately welcomed as allies. Only the victory of the Axis powers in the Balkans frustrated the plan of involving Germany in battle in the southeast for
months, allowing the Soviet Russian armies to complete their march and increase their readiness for action. Together with
England, and with the hoped for American supplies, they would have been ready to strangle and defeat the German Reich and
Italy. Thus Moscow not only broke our treaty of friendship, but betrayed it! They did all this while the powers
in the Kremlin, to the very last minute, hypocritically attempted to favor peace and friendship, just as they had with Finland
I was forced by circumstances to keep silent in
the past. Now the moment has come when further silence would be not only a sin, but a crime against the German people, against
Today, about 160 Russian divisions stand at our
border. There have been steady border violations for weeks, and not only on our border, but in the far north, and also in
Rumania. Russian pilots make a habit of ignoring the border, perhaps to show us that they already feel as if they are in control. During the night of 17-18 June, Russian patrols again crossed the German border and could only be repelled after a long
battle. Now the hour has come when it is necessary to respond to his plot by Jewish-Anglo-Saxon warmongers and the Jewish
rulers of Moscow's Bolshevist headquarters. German people!
this moment, an attack unprecedented in the history of the world in its extent and size has begun. With Finnish comrades,
the victors of Narvik stand by the Arctic Sea. German divisions, under the command of the conqueror of Norway, together with
the heroes of Finland's freedom and their marshal, defend Finnish soil. On the Eastern Front, German formations extend from
East Prussia to the Carpathians. From the banks of the Pruth River, from the lower Danube to the Black Sea, German and Romanian
soldiers are united under state leader Antonescu. The purpose of this front is no longer the protection of the individual
nations, but rather the safety of Europe, and therefore the salvation of everyone.
I have therefore decided today once again to put the fate of Germany and the future of the German Reich and our people
in the hands of our soldiers. May God help us in this battle
Federal Reserve reported last week that the economic crisis left the median American family in 2010 with no more wealth than
in the early 1990s, wiping away two decades of gains. With stocks too risky for many small investors and savings accounts
paying little interest, building up a nest egg is a challenge even for those who can afford to sock away some of their money.
Garland Miller, 28, who has degrees in finance and
accounting from the University of Georgia and Kennesaw State University, had hoped to land a job at a big accounting firm,
and to have been able to buy a home by now. Instead he finds himself working as the lead server at a steakhouse. But he has
not given up on trying to move into the field that he prepared himself for: This month, he attended a jobs fair in Duluth,
a suburb of Atlanta, organized by the University of Georgia for its alumni.
"I'm not in a job where I'm using all of my skills," Mr. Miller said. He said that with many baby boomers
unable to retire as early as they had hoped, there are fewer opportunities for younger workers to move up and take their places.
"Instead you have everybody competing for entry-level positions," he said.
Things are much worse for people without college degrees, though. The real entry-level hourly wage for men who recently
graduated from high school fell to $11.68 last year, from $15.64 in 1979, according to data from the Economic Policy Institute.
And the percentage of those jobs that offer health insurance has plummeted to 22.8 percent, from 63.3 percent in 1979. .........
WHAT THE NATIONAL MEDIA DIDN'T REPORT
ON THE PRINCIPAL WHO WOULD NOT LET KINDERGARTNERS SING "GOD BLESS THE USA"
From local Reports.....
kindergarten classes had been working on the patriotic song for months as it was to be the musical finale for the June 20th
commencement ceremony. The children were to wave small American flags during the show as a show of patriotism. This song has
been sung in the past at the school, each time concluding with a rowdy, standing ovation.
Greta Hawkins had other ideas. Hawkins stormed in on a recent rehearsal, and ordered the
teachers to remove the song from the program. According to other teachers, Hawkins stated "We don't want to
offend other cultures."
also has an issue with standing and reciting our Pledge of Allegiance because her religious views forbid a salute of any nation's
flag. Last I checked it is kind of important for a figure of authority in a child's life to set the proper example...............
Greta has also been disciplined for racial remarks made at a faculty meeting in 2010 where she stated that
the school was "racist" and declared: "I'm black. Your previous principal was white and Jewish. More of us
the official spokeswoman
for the NY Dept. of Education gave an explanation that teachers at the school never heard -that Hawkins found the lyrics "too
grown up" for the kindergartners. So instead of singing a patriotic classic that has been deemed "age
inappropriate" for the innocent children, they will instead sing Justin Bieber's - "Baby".
In the largest episode of forced migration in history, millions of German-speaking civilians were sent to Germany
from Czechoslovakia (above) and other European countries after World War II by order of the United States, Britain, and the
Continue reading here from the Chronicle of Higher Education:
Israeli troops took aim and fired on this this statue of Virgin Mary on top of
the Catholic Church in Bethlehem. The Israelis hit the statue 70 times and in so doing mutilated her face and blew her hands
off. It cannot be ignored, that while Christian-Zionists pre-occupy themselves with other Holy Books, the Jewish Talmud refers
to the Virgin Mary as a "whore". The actions of Israeli troops seem to codify this belief.
There has been no apology to Christians by any Israeli Leader for the desecration of this Christian Holy site and
A WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS SPECIAL
1, 2013, marks the 74th anniversary of the German invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939.
To mark this anniversary, World View Foundations presents this broadcast of the original 1939 Radio Broadcast as
heard in the United States on U.S. Radio Networks from the German Reichstag of Adolf Hitler's address to the world announcing
Germany's response to Polish atrocities and to the Danzig issue and the German invasion.
will hear Adolf Hitler's speech to the world translated with comments just as Americans heard it in their homes in September
It is the Fault of the Jews! by Joseph Goebbels November 16, 1941
has been proven so extensively that International Jewry is historically at fault for the expansion of the war, that not a
word needs to be wasted about that. The Jews wanted their war, and now they have it. But now the prophecy in the Fuehrer's
speech of Jan 30, 1939 in the Deutschen Reichstag meeting, that if the International Finance Jewry shall succeed to throw
countries once again into a war, the result will not be so much that Bolshevism will be coming upon the earth if the Jews
are allowed to become the victors, but the ruin of the Jewish race in Europe. We are now experiencing the fulfillment
of this prophecy, and the Jews are suffering a fate that, even though it is hard, they have more than deserved. Compassion
or even regret are totally inappropriate. World Jewry has completely underestimated the strength of its own power in their
instigation of this war, and it is now gradually experiencing a destruction process  which it wanted for us and would have
mercilessly enforced on us, if it had had the power for that. Now the situation we have is according to their own laws, an
eye for an eye. In this historical confrontation, every Jew is our enemy, regardless if he is vegetating in a Polish
ghetto or eking out his parasitic existence in Berlin or Hamburg, or forging his war plans in New York or Washington by blasting
the war trumpet. All Jews, due to their birth and race, belong to an international conspiracy against the national socialistic
Germany. They desire Germany's defeat and destruction and do whatever is in their power to bring it about. The fact that they
now have little opportunity to do this inside the Reich, is not because the ones that are still here are loyal to us, but
only because we have taken measures that seem appropriate to us. One of them is the introduction of the yellow Jewish
star. This every Jew must display on himself in clear sight. With that we want to mark him as a Jew, most of all for the purpose
that he can be clearly identified as such in his slightest action aimed against our Volk community. This is an exceptional
humane  regulation, in other words a hygienic prophylaxis, which shall avoid that the Jew can sneak into our groups and
sow discord. When the Jews showed up a few weeks ago, marked with a Jewish star, at first, the population of the Reichshauptstadt
was perplexed. Only very few knew that there were still that many Jews in Berlin. Everyone discovered in his area or neighborhood
a contemporary [but a Jew] acting as if he was harmless, except for his occasional griping or inappropriate action but would
have never recognized him as a Jew. So, obviously, he has masked himself in mimicry, adjusted to his environment in which
he lived, and waited for the hour of his opportunity. Who of us would have recognized that an enemy stands right next to us
who was a silent listener or skilled agitator in talks on the street, the U-Bahn, and amongst the lines assorting in front
of the cigarette stores? There are Jews who can hardly be recognized from their looks. They have aligned themselves here also
as much as possible. These are the most dangerous ones. It is characteristic that every action we take against the Jews shows
up the next day in the English and U.S. papers. So one can see that the Jews here have secret connections, even today, to
the enemy states, not only in their personal business, but connections in all important war affairs which they exploit for
this purpose. Therefore, the enemy is amidst us. What would be closer at hand than to at least make them identifiable to our
population? In the first days after the introduction of the Jewish star to be worn, newspaper sales skyrocketed. Every
Jew that came on the streets, went for a newspaper to hide shamefully his Mark of Cain. When this was forbidden, we saw here
and there on the streets of Berlin West Jews parading around with non Jewish foreigners. These servants of the Jews actually
deserve a Jewish star, too. The arguments they bring for their provocative behavior are always the same: 'The Jews are people,
too;' as if we had ever insisted that they were not, and as if the same is not also true for killers, child rapists, thieves
and pimps. But then, who would want to take the opportunity and go parading with them on the Kurfuerstendamm! So it goes on,
their Jews are decent Jews. Every Jew has found a stupid and instinct-lacking goy, who believes the Jew to be decent! 'O,
we've known each other for years,' to give the Jew the benefit of honor and much more of this nonsense. Gradually the
Jews are now on their own and so try new tricks. You know the goodhearted German Michel  in all of us, who is always ready
to forgive all injustice heaped upon him for a few sentimental tears offered. Suddenly, one gets the impression that all of
Berlin's Jews are nothing but cute little babies who in their childlike helplessness touch our hearts; or that all their women
are fragile. They may confuse a few of our unsuspicious types, but not us. We know exactly whom we are dealing with. Alone
because of them, we must win the war. If we were to lose it, these harmless Jewish petty bourgeois would suddenly turn into
raving wolves. They would come upon our Volk, upon our women and children , to carry out a revenge mission not existing
in all of world history. That's what they did in Bessarabia and in the Baltic states when Bolshevism marched in; and there,
neither the population nor the government had ever caused them any harm. We cannot turn back from our fight against the Jews-not
to mention that we do not want to. The Jews have to be separated from the German Volk because they threaten our national solidarity.
This is an elemental law of a voelkisch, nationalistic and socialistic hygiene. They will never leave us in peace. They
would, if they could, turn one country after another against us in war. What do they care about the sorrow of humanity connected
to that, as long as they can force the world under their financial and racial reign! The Jews are a parasitic race, which
like a rotting mold comes upon instinct-deprived populations. For that there is only one solution: Cut them off and throw
How pathetic are the stupid, thoughtless, tear-jerking arguments of a few remaining Jew lovers
versus a world problem that bothered mankind for thousands of years. Their jars and eyes would drop, if they could see their
dear Jews once in a power position. But then it would be too late. And therefore, it is the duty of a national leadership,
with all the measures they have available to them, to make sure that this will never happen. There is a difference between
humans and humans, just as there is a difference between animals and animals. We know of good and bad people, just as we know
of good and bad animals. The fact that the Jews still lives amongst us is not prove for their benevolence. Just like a flea
drawn to us is not a pet just because it is in the home. When a Mr. Bramsig or a Mrs. Knoeterich feels great pity for an elderly
Jewish lady when they see her wearing a Jewish star, then let them not forget that a removed nephew of this old lady, with
the name Nathan Kaufman is sitting in New York hatching a plan to sterilize all Germans under the age of 60, and that the
son of her distant uncle is a warmonger under the name Baruch, or Morgenthau, or Untermayer and the driving force behind Mr.
Roosevelt to instigate him into war. And if they succeed, a brave but ignorant American soldier may kill the only son of Mr.
Bramsig or Mrs. Knoeterich, all for the higher honor of Jewry, to which also this old woman belongs, no matter how fragile
or pitiful she comes across. If we Germans even have a fatal flaw in our national character, short in memory. This flaw
testifies to our human decency and generosity, but not always to our political insight and prudence. We think that all people
are benevolent like us. The French threatened us in the winter of 1939/40 with chopping our Reich into pieces, and that we
will have to line up with our families in long lines in front of their field kitchens to get a slab of warm food. Our military
defeated France in six weeks, and then you see the German soldiers on the streets handing out bread and sausages to the hungry
French women and children and gasoline to the stranded Parisian, so they can return to their metropolis as soon as possible
and, at least partially, continue to display their hate against the Reich. That's how we Germans are. Our national virtue
is our national defect. But we all do not want to be any other way, and wherever our world-famous benevolence is not causing
terrible damage to ourselves, then there is nothing to object. But already Klopstock  gave us the good advice, 'to not
be so honorable; our enemies are not noble enough to recognize how virtuous our defects are.' If fitting somewhere the
best, than this warning fits into our current circumstances with respect to the Jews. Here compliance is not only a weakness
but negligence of duty and a crime against the national security on top of it. Because the Jews long for one opportunity,
to reward our foolishness with blood and terror. This must never come to pass. And one of the most effective measures against
this is unforgiving, stony cold hardness against these slayers of our nation, against the instigators of this war, against
the beneficiaries if we were to lose this war, and therefore, also necessarily so against their own victims, when we win the
war. Therefore, it shall be said once more to the point of overdoing it:
1. The Jews are our downfall. They have instigated and brought about this war. With it they wanted to destroy the
German Reich and our people. This plan must be destroyed. 2. There is no difference from Jew to Jew. Every Jew is a
sworn enemy of the German people. If he does not show his enmity then only because he is either a coward or he is shrewd,
but not because he does not carry hate in his heart against us. 3. Every German soldier who falls in this war, is on
account of the Jews. They have him on their conscience and that's why they will have to pay for it. 4. When you see
someone with the Jew star, then know that he is an enemy of our nation. Whoever associates with him privately belongs to the
Jew and must be evaluated and treated like a Jew. He deserves the contempt of the whole nation whom he cowardly and meanly
deserts in her hardest time to join the side of our enemy. 5. The Jews benefit from the protection of the enemy countries.
There is no further proof necessary of their malign role against our nation. 6. The Jews are messengers for the enemies
amongst us. Whoever is on their side, has joined the enemy in this war. 7. The Jews have no right to claim having the
same rights as us. Wherever they agitate against us on the street, in the lines in front of the stores, and in public transportation,
they are to be silenced. Not only because what they say is foundationally false, but because they are Jews and have no voice
in our community. 8. If the Jews approach you sentimentally, remember that this is done speculating that you are forgetful;
show them immediately that you can look through their deceit and punish them with disdain. 9. To a decent enemy we grant
generosity after their defeat. But the Jew is not a decent enemy, he only pretends to be. 10. The Jews are responsible
for the war. They are not receiving any injustice from us by the way we treat them. They have more than deserved it. To
find a final solution for them is the responsibility of the government. No one has the right to act in his own behalf, but
instead everyone has the duty to honor the measures against the Jews and to represent these measures amongst everyone. In
recognition of the danger of the
Jews, it is the
duty [of every German] to not be confused by their tricks and chicanery. This is demanded of all of us for the security of
Reich Commissioner Gauleiter Josef Bürckel Every Decent Person Will Help: As of Today,
Prices will Drop in Vienna March, 1939
When I was entrusted a year ago with
the task of reuniting the Ostmark with the Reich, one of my main concerns was the question: "What must be done to de-Jewdify
Vienna?" If one asks such a question, he must know the real nature of the object he intends to deal with, and more than
that he must ask how this object relates to its environment. In short: What drives the Jews in Vienna, and what consequences
follow? As a result of the interrelationship in the city, do only Germans live in enmity with the Jews in Vienna, or is there
also the curious concept of "Jewish Viennese"? That is the deep question in this matter. Its answer determines the
means that must be used to eliminate the evil. If 300,000 Jews continue to live in this city, and are able with the favor
and support of the government to continue to follow their racial drives, then it is only too easy to understand why many of
the Jews are able to continue their methods of exploitation, sometimes unnoticed. To speak openly: The unrestricted activities
of the Jewish spirit in this city in the past is the ultimate reason why it is so difficult to free working people from the
curse of the Jewish spirit. The Jew follows this principle: "My money is my honor." In practice, both in the past
and today, that meant that the more money a Jew had, the more he was respected. That meant that the richer a Jew was the more
honor one gave him. This was not, however, the attitude of the average man, but rather exclusively that of the so-called
"better circles of society." In reality, the honor of the Jew is seen in the amount of misery prevailing among the
broad masses. He had the money, the broad masses the misery. It is absolutely true that where one has the "most honorable"
Jews, there one also has the greatest misery among the broad masses. Jewish love of money and mass misery stand in an
absolutely direct relationship. But what is misery for one cannot be honorable for another. The Jewish motto "My money
is my honor" must be replaced by the ethical and moral German motto: "My honor is reflected in the fate of the whole
community." That means that the contribution of each individual to the whole is the sum of all his honorable activity.
Applied to what we are talking about today this means for the individual: Jewish merchants and usurers must be replaced by
the honest German merchant, for only that is honorable that contributes to the good of the whole. The Problem that Most
Concerns the Viennese The battle now raging between the honest merchant and the Jewish haggler is easiest to understand
if one looks at those who supply people with their daily needs, the things necessary for the standard of living of the whole
community. Do they want to raise that standard of living, or is the aim of their speculation to lower it for their own benefit
whenever they can? I want to consider this question using examples, take a clear position, and then draw the necessary
conclusions to deal with conflicts with the Jewish spirit. The economic problem that has most concerned the citizens of the
Ostmark in recent weeks months- and particularly the city of Vienna- is pricing and price policy. Remember the period
of inflation, the time of rising and falling currency values in various countries. The German, for example, tended to flee
from inflation, because it meant destruction. The Jew, on the other hand, had a need to be at the right place at the right
time to take advantage of inflation. Such an exclusively commercial approach that mocks the laws of ethnic life is the
enemy of any solid and firm economic system, and in particular the enemy of economically appropriate firm prices, which are
the foundation of healthy economic life. Such a commercial approach rejects firm prices even if all of the prerequisites of
stability and order in economic life are present, such as the conditions that the Führer of the National Socialist state
has created. A "fair price" is one that results from honest calculation, and than therefore be charged by an
honest merchant, without putting his integrity in doubt. It is an expression of community spirit that leads the customer to
respect the integrity of the merchant. That is the first sign of the cancer that the Jews brought to our city. This cancer
explains why it is so difficult to bring order to pricing in the city, to establish the necessary trust between buyer and
seller. After Today, Everything Has to Change! We will not permit coded prices, nor will we "bargain."
That does not make us the enemy of the merchant of Vienna. We are the enemy only of the unreliable haggler, but we are the
ally of the honest merchant, and must be sure that the customer respects him. On the other hand, the customer may not
be seen as an idiot whose pocket one may freely pick. We created the concept of "Aryanization." Aryanization does
not only mean the "takeover of a Jewish business by an Aryan"; "Aryanization" also means a "cleaning
from the Jewish spirit." If one only wanted a change in personnel such that the successor looked different than his predecessor
but business practices remained the same, one could leave things as they were. I am talking only of those merchants
who are the exceptions, but who provide an example of what not to do. I speak of the negative only because the positive in
this city speaks for itself. This Really Happens These kinds of things happen. Some item costs 6 RM. The merchant
calculates a selling price of 12 RM. He tells his sales clerks, however, to ask 14 RM. He even promises them a percentage
of what they get above the price he calculates. If the clerk wants to earn something over his miserable wages to help his
family, he must join in this genuine Jewish swindle. He has already been infected by the Jewish profiteering bacterium, just
as much as his boss. Another example. A fur shop sells a coat for 1600 RM. According to experts in the trade, a fair
price is 700 RM. The trade organization calls this a crass and irresponsible action that one could expect only of Jews. As
the result of a complaint, prices in a leather goods store were reviewed. The profit margin ranged from 80% to 383%. Monthly
sales at the shop were 40,000 RM in 1937, 105,000 RM today. In this case, one can say that one Jew went and another one came.
This was not what is meant by Aryanization. Jewish "Foot-and-Mouth Disease" Still another example. A
shop offered an alarm clock to a worker for 30 RM. It finally sold it to him for 4 RM. Another shop sold coffee in various
packages for 45, 55, 75, and 90 pfennig They all came from the same sack of coffee. And so on, and so on. Such things
show that the Jewish plague does not hold back from infecting the Aryan. The best thing one can probably say is that such
an Aryan is inflected with the "Jewish disease." They talk well, but steal money from the average person. They have
succumbed to "Jewish foot-and-mouth disease." One has to wonder about how fast such people understand things. In Vienna, there can be only honest merchant, with no Jews remaining. Those who feel offended by my remarks are the
Jews I am talking about. Those who are thankful that their commercial honor is established are our allies, and we theirs.
When I am told that "prices are governed by supply and demand," I reply that that principle is a sin against the
community. Following such a principle would mean that if hens lay fewer eggs, the price will rise such that the sick child
of a poor person will never enjoy an egg. Prices may not be determined by supply and demand, as the Jews teach. I say instead
that prices have a function within the community, and that therefore they are a matter of attitude. Alignment with the
Old Reich Through major nationalization efforts and constant review of costs by producers, there will in the foreseeable
future be an organic alignment with prices in the old Reich. This will occur as rapidly as possible. That will put an end
to unfavorable effects on the standard of living. In commerce - and especially here in Vienna - careful review already shows
the possibility of substantial price cuts. These will be fully implemented in coming days and weeks. It is also necessary
to determine prices for small shops, so that the honest and decent merchant can calculate margins clearly, thus establishing
confidence between merchants and their customers in Vienna according to the spirit of the people's community. This will finally
put an end to the dubious arena of deceitful Jewish economic activity. Fair Prices for the Poorest I have, therefore,
decided to set the margins today for textiles, clothing, hosiery, knitwear, and shoes. Further regulations will follow. I
do not see all these measures as a matter for the police or something like that, but rather as the expression of an inner
sense of community in place of cold calculation. He who is part of the community and who knows that the poorest people are
the most loyal in times of need will set prices so that these people can have at least a bearable life. The pricing system
is really a matter of character. Vienna's True Heart He who lies happily in bed at night because his cash register
is overflowing because he has made a good "Rebach" [Yiddish for profit, here pejorative], but forgets that because
of that someone else's family is going to bed hungry, lacks the heart of a true Viennese. And he who can look himself in the
eye in the mirror in the evening and say to himself: "One again you have been an exemplary member of the community today"
is our comrade, one we call an "honest merchant." I also think - and not in a friendly way - of those who always
have the background music of complaint in their dealings. They stand behind the counter and say things like "This will
be out of stock soon," or "This is the last of the English material," or "You don't have to buy it if
you don't want to." I recently said that the people does not exist for the Party, but rather the Party and its
leaders have to work day and night for the people. The Merchant Must Serve the Customer To put it clearly, the
decent German customer is not there for the benefit of the merchant. Their relationship is personal, not merely commercial.
The same principles apply here as they do everywhere else in the people's community. Things such as preferential treatment,
rude treatment, and irresponsible complaining must be eliminated. Citizens of Vienna! I have spoken about a dry topic
today. But this matter relates to our daily life. Now is the time to think and act as National Socialists! Everyone
must know this: National Socialism depends on loyalty, and prefers to avoid harsh measures. If some people are incorrigible,
they earn their reward. The conclusions to be drawn from these remarks, which apply down to the last village in the Ostmark,
are these: 1. In coming days, in Vienna and in the rest of the Ostmark, everything possible will be done to eliminate
everything that has anything to do with the Jewish spirit, for the Jewish spirit and National Socialism go together like fire
and water. I am thinking not only of prices, but of other things that go with honest commerce. It will not be
possible for one to have to buy some water along with his vegetables in the market. If someone tells me that this is the custom
in Vienna, I saw in the name of all decent Viennese businessmen: "That is no Viennese custom, but rather Jewish tradition."
Just as we think little of a person who has a friendly expression, but is rotten inside, so we forbid in the future that one
puts a layer of good apples at the top of a carton of rotten fruit. No one will slip past us in this educational campaign.
If someone thinks that, since the margin for mass produced articles is higher than that for fashionable clothing, he can stop
making the mass produced articles and say: "For the time being, I no longer carry work uniforms," we will know how
to respond. He who does not carry work uniforms because he earns less from them separates himself from the community. Even
the little man, with his needs, belongs to this community. We will stand by the little man in such cases, and refuse to patronize
such so-called "high class shops." National Socialism has an ethical law: From him to earns the least, the
least must be demanded. By the way, he who wants to earn his money in a different way proves that he is absolutely unnecessary
in Vienna and the rest of the Ostmark. We know only one way of dealing with unnecessary things: Get rid of them! 2.
We want to make life in this city hell for anyone who has a stronger Jewish spirit than a German spirit. Vienna must become
the city of honest commerce in the East, an honest city. Commerce in Vienna will earn a reputation shared by few cities in
the world. Everyone - whether citizen or foreigner - must display the same honest conduct. I want to speak particularly
to those party comrades who have taken over Jewish businesses. These men are obliged to display National Socialism in practice.
I expect them to be my most loyal allies. That will not stop me, however, from speaking clearly, and taking the necessary
steps, even in the case of party comrades. How Were Things a Year Ago? Each person should ask himself the question:
"How was my business going a year ago?" Everyone must know that our wonderful Führer is responsible for everything
that has happened. He works day and night for us all. Without him, nothing would happen. Without him, the German economy would
not be flourishing. And what he has given us has not been given to the individual, but rather to the whole. That means that
the individual has no right to steal as his heart desires. Do not hold it against me if I have upset one person or another
today. I do it only because I must serve you and the cause. The battle against evil is always a battle for good. I am therefore
ready to ignore much of what happened in the past. Some were in trouble and tried to rescue themselves as fast as they could.
That was wrong. But now, there has to be an end to it. Strike a blow against the Jewish spirit that afflicted this beautiful
city and its fine citizens for centuries. In the future, do not speak of Christ and mean cotton, do not sing "Deutschland
über alles" and mean profit. You All Bear the Swastika! They mean something only when they come from
inner conviction. Inner conviction is not a matter of theory, but rather of practice. The swastika is appropriate only for
the honest merchant, for whom we are fighting. The others should take it off, for they have nothing to do with us, and we
have nothing to do with them. The Party is ready to support the honest merchant in any situation. We will knock the teeth
out of those who betray us. There is no other choice. Every citizen of Vienna will stand by my side in this struggle.
We stand by the honest German merchant in Vienna, but will fight the Jewdified parasite to the end.
"Unless I am convinced by proofs from Scriptures
or by plain and clear reasons and arguments,
I can and will not retract
for it is neither safe nor wise to do anything against conscience.
most produced, most popular automible in history
WHO REALLY PAID FOR THE USS LIBERTY DAMAGES?
In May 1968, the Israeli government paid $3,323,500
as full payment to the families of the 34 men killed in the attack, LESS THAN $100,000 FOR EACH USS
Liberty DEATH, while alleged "Holocaust" survivors have received 10 times
Ten months later in March 1969, Israel
paid a further $3,566,457 in compensation to the men who had been wounded.
On 18 December 1980, Israel agreed to pay ONLY $6 million of
the final U.S. bill of $17,132,709 for material damage to the Liberty itself plus 13 years' interest.
Given the amount of U.S. Taxpayer dollars Congress sent Israel in 1968, 1969, and
1980 in cash, credit ,and military equipment, did Israel really pay anything OR did the U.S. Taxpayer
pay for Israel's attack on OUR OWN Sailors and Ship?
the 1980 $6 million settlement (a number Jews like) out of the $17 million due, correlates with
Congressional Appropriations at the time, as do the the 1968 and 1969 Victim Pay Outs.
Might we just call this Jewish accounting??
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS HONORS ADMIRAL THOMAS H.
MOORER An Anti-Israeli American Navy Man
Moorer graduated from the U.S, Naval Academy in 1933 and served in World War II, Korea and the Vietnam Conflict.
Admiral Moorer was the first man to serve as Commander of both the Atlantic and Pacific Fleets. Admiral Moorer served as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 1970 to 1974.
Admiral Moorer had courage of conviction to speak out
against Israeli influences in U.S. policy.
Israeli attack on the USS Liberty, Admiral Moorer stated, "Israel attempted to prevent the
Liberty's radio operators from sending a call for help by jamming American emergency radio channels" and "Israeli
torpedo boats machine-gunned lifeboats at close range that had been lowered to rescue the most-seriously
wounded."Admiral Moorer stated there had been a conspiracy to cover up the Israeli attack
on the USS Liberty and asked readers of his opinion article in the Stars and Stripes, the official
newspaper of the United States Armed Forces, whether "our government put Israel's interests
ahead of our own and if so Why does our government continue to subordinate American interests to Israeli
In a 1983 interview, Admiral
Moorer said, "I've never seen a
President, I don't care who he is - stand up to them. It just boggles the mind. They always get
what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't
writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our
government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on."
We need more people with the courage of conviction as
Admiral Moorer demonstrated.
JEWS OPENLY DISCUSSED
THEIR ROLE IN "RESHAPING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA'S RACIAL LANDSCAPE"
For years Jews denied allegations that
they actually promote the reordering of the "Racial Landscape" in the host Nations they
inhabit. Throughout history over 700 Nations and or City States have expelled Jews as a result of Jewish intrigue. In
the United States and in Europe, the most extreme multi-cultural racial policies have been promoted
by Jewry that have resulted in the cultural genocide of traditional Western-Christian European Society
and Cultural Traditions.
Jews reject the very racial and multi-cultural policies they promote in America and Europe. Israel's
prides itself as being a solely "Jewish Nation". Israel's racial policies are by far more
"extreme" than South Africa's Apartied and Germany's Nuremburg Laws combined.
In May, 2012, Jews in America openly debate their "success"
in changing the "Racial Landscape" in Southern California via a Discussion/ Seminar at
UCLA . Discussed as marked success is the "unwhiting" of Southern California".
What was not discussed is the ever more 3rd Worldness of California, and the rest of America for
that matter. The United States is rapidly becoming a "Jim Jones Multi-Cultural People's
Temple", with Americans lining up to drink the poisoned multi-cultural Kool-Aid.
FORGET RONALD REAGAN- ADOLF HITLER WAS THE FIRST LEADER TO CONFRONT "THE EVIL
EMPIRE" By: Rodney Martin, World View Foundations
the so called "Spanish Republic" was proclaimed, the result... a Marxist State that embarked on a reign of terror
to purge centuries of Christianity and Western Culture from a very religious (Catholic) Spain. Under the "Spanish (Marxist)
Republic", all economic activity in Spain was centered on the State (government). Government sanctioned Marxist
Militias roamed Spain murdering Priests, Nuns and religious groups in religious purges on a scale that made Stalin proud.
The Republican Government of Spain (Marxists) destroyed the economy and moral of the Nation. Over 7000 Catholic Priests and
Nuns were murdered by the Marxists while the United States, Britain, and France remained silent. In 1936 the "Spanish
Republic" formally declared itself a Marxist Republic with only 34% of the vote. Joseph Stalin, America's future 1941
Ally, in the Soviet Union embraced the "new" Spain and Pravda declared Spain an "ally of the Soviet Union and
described Spain as a "Soviet Socialist State". Thus in 1936, Spain become the very first Soviet satellite in Europe,
ten years before the start of the Cold War. One man, a deeply religious Christian (Catholic), General Francisco Franco
and his small army rose up against the Marxists and their violence and persecution of Christianity in his Nation. General
Franco, from his command in the Spanish Colony of Morocco, invaded his own County in order to liberate it from the repression
of Godless Marxism. The people soon rallied to General Franco, especially devote Christians, while foreigners from the United
States, Britain, and France flocked to defend the Marxists. Interestingly, other so called "Western Christian"
Nations of Western Europe, specifically Great Britain and France refused to offer any aid to Franco. The United States supported
the Marxist "Republican Government" as well, in fact President Franklin D. Roosevelt sent a personal check in support
of the Marxist Government. The only two Nations and world leaders that supported Franco and were Adolf Hitler in National
Socialist Germany and Benito Mussolini in Fascist Italy. Adolf Hitler sent the Battleship Deutschland which provided logistical
support to General Franco and the famous Luftwaffe Condor Legion provided the air support that enabled Franco to win his land
war. Mussolini proved to be a reliable source of supplies and volunteers due to geography to Franco. Adolf Hitler and Benito
Mussolini understood that the Soviet Union was an Evil Empire some 60 years before the world Ronald Reagan coin the term and
they drove the Soviets from Western Europe. Because of Hitler's and Mussolini's support, General Franco went on
to liberate his Country from the Marxists in 1939 and bring stability and prosperity to Spain, eventually restoring the Spanish
Constitutional Monarchy (King Juan Carlos) in 1975 who still rules today. General Franco not only ended the Marxist Spanish
Republic and its wholesale slaughter of Christians, but also prevented the creation of a Soviet satellite State in Western
Europe, 10 years before what became known as the Cold War.
can only imagine the ramifications of having a Communist Spain west of the Iron Curtain for the duration of the Cold War.
How ironic it was that Franco's sole assistance came not from the so called "Christian" Western Democracies, but
from National Socialist Germany by way of its Luftwaffe Condor Legion and Kriegsmarine pocketbattleship Deutschland and Italy
which sent arms and volunteer troops, both Nations being staunchly anti-Communist.
One can also
imagine what might have been had the United States and Great Britain NOT been on the wrong side of history two years after
Franco's victory when Germany confronted the Soviet Union directly, at the critical point when German troops were 12 miles
from capturing Moscow and ending "the Evil Empire", Great Britain and the United States supplied and saved Stalin's
Communist Empire and the rest is history.
What is learned from Franco and the Spanish Civil
War is that we cannot allow history to be told to us by TV Entertainers with an agenda nor allow it to be restated with uncomfortable
elements redacted. History is as it was.
The great Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius said it best
in Number 29 of Book 7 of his famous "Meditations".
Gottfried Feder - Germany's Anti-Usury Crusader
Usury and the Corruption of American Society
by Clement Pulaski
Many of those on the far-right today are aware of the Federal Reserve and the negative
impact that it has had on America since its founding in 1913. But this is not the first time that a questionable state-sanctioned
bank has been accused of corrupting American society, as those familiar with the presidency of Andrew Jackson know. Perhaps
the defining feature of Jackson's tenure in office was his war against the National Bank of his day. The Second Bank of the
United States was established in 1817 with a twenty year charter, but by the 1820s the Bank had already become widely unpopular.
Jackson argued strongly against renewing the charter of the Bank, and thanks to his efforts the charter was allowed to lapse
in 1836, effectively destroying the Bank. And while Jackson was successful in some respects, his victory was only a minor
setback for the corrosive Money Power, because he failed to deal with the inherent evil of usury.
When looking at Jackson's attacks on the Bank, the words seem to apply perfectly to our current situation under the
Federal Reserve. (The following quotes are taken from Jackson's 1833 and 1834 State of the Union addresses):
[T]he question is distinctly presented whether the people of the United States
are to govern through representatives chosen by their unbiased suffrages or whether the money and power of a great corporation
are to be secretly exerted to influence their judgment and control their decisions. It must now be determined whether the
bank is to have its candidates for all offices in the country, from the highest to the lowest, or whether candidates on both
sides of political questions shall be brought forward as heretofore and supported by the usual means. At this time the
efforts of the bank to control public opinion, through the distresses of some and the fears of others, are equally apparent...while
through presses known to have been sustained by its money it attempts by unfounded alarms to create a panic in all. [The
Bank has] actively engaged in attempting to influence the elections of the public officers by means of its money...in violation
of the express provisions of its charter, it [has] by a formal resolution placed its funds at the disposition of its president
to be employed in sustaining the political power of the bank.
to Jackson, the Bank manufactured panics amongst the public to justify its own existence, and used the power of money and
the press to control the election process. Furthermore, this use of public funds was contrary to law:
It is a constitutional provision "that no money shall be drawn from the Treasury but in consequence of appropriations
made by law". The palpable object of this provision is to prevent the expenditure of the public money for any purpose
what so ever which shall not have been 1st approved by the representatives of the people and the States in Congress assembled...According
to this plain constitutional provision, the claim of the bank can never be paid without an appropriation by act of Congress.
But the bank has never asked for an appropriation. It attempts to defeat the provision of the Constitution and obtain payment
without an act of Congress.
Jackson also pointed out that despite
the claims of its supporters, a national bank simply was not necessary:
Happily it is already illustrated that the agency of such an institution is not necessary to the fiscal operations
of the Government. The State banks are found fully adequate to the performance of all services which were required of the
Bank of the United States, quite as promptly and with the same cheapness.
Finally Jackson warned the American people of the great dangers that await them if the Money Power were to have free
The bold effort the present bank has made to control
the Government, the distresses it has wantonly produced...are but premonitions of the fate which awaits the American people
should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it.
Indeed the problems of the 1830s were but mere premonitions of what has befallen
America in the last 100 years.
When reading Jackson's words,
one notices that while his criticisms are aimed only at the National Bank, in most instances they apply equally to private
banks. Private banks are quite capable of using their money to control the press, manufacture economic crises, and manipulate
elections. While a powerful National Bank that directly uses tax-payer money is more sinister and more dangerous, unchecked
private banks are dangerous enough. It would be unfair for us to attack Jackson for his failure to go after the private banks,
for acceptance of usury was pervasive in the 19th century. By the time of the American revolution the nations of Europe, both
Catholic and Protestant, had fallen away from the strong Medieval aversion to usury. It was not until the fascist and national
socialist movements of the 1920s that Western civilization began to formulate a comprehensive response to the problems of
interest-banking and industrial capitalism.
In his book Manifesto
for the Abolition of Interest-Slavery prominent National Socialist economist Gottfried Feder argued that interest-banking
was at the root of societal decay. Feder understood that the worship of money in general (mammonism) and interest-banking
in particular are deadly to civilization:
Mammonism is the heavy,
all-encompassing and overwhelming sickness from which our contemporary cultural sphere, and indeed all mankind, suffers. It
is like a devastating illness, like a devouring poison, that has gripped the peoples of the world. By Mammonism is to be understood:
on the one hand, the overwhelming international money-powers, the supragovernmental financial power enthroned above any right
of self-determination of peoples, international big capital...on the other hand, a mindset that has taken hold of the broadest
circle of peoples; the insatiable lust for gain, the purely wordly-oriented conception of life that has already led to a frightening
decline of all moral concepts and can only lead to more. The chief source of power for Mammonism is the effortless and
endless income that is produced through interest. The idea of interest on loans is the diabolical invention of big loan-capital;
it alone makes possible the lazy drone's life of a minority of tycoons at the expense of the productive peoples and their
work-potential; it has led to profound, irreconcilable differences, to class-hatred, from which war among citizens and brothers
was born. The only cure, the radical means to heal suffering humanity is the abolition of enslavement to interest on money.
The abolition of enslavement to interest on money signifies the only possible and conclusive liberation of productive labor
from the hidden coercive money-powers. The abolition of enslavement to interest signifies the restoration of the free personality,
the redemption of man from slavery, from the curse whereby Mammonism has bound his soul. The avalanche-like growth of
loan-capital surpasses all human capacity for calculation, through eternal, endless, and effortless income from interest,
and from interest on interest.
Through the practice of interest-banking
an ever larger percentage of currency (either real or imagined) is in the hands of the banks, and less and less in the hands
of productive individuals. In this sense interest-banking is almost a type of illusion or spell cast upon the minds of men.
Year by year the banks are wealthier and producers are poorer, but the imbalance in productivity between the two groups remains
constant. The power of the banks comes from us agreeing that they have power. This reveals the other necessary condition for
the domination of society by money-lenders: the greed of the common people. Our people undoubtedly have a "purely wordly-oriented
conception of life", and agree to the system of the bankers because they still desire the banker's credit. The common
people are minor, temporary beneficiaries of the banking system, taking pleasure in living beyond their means, ignoring the
impending destruction of their nations. The common people benefit from interest-banking in the same way that addicts benefit
from drug dealers: they receive the fleeting enjoyment of something they do not truly need while handing over all their wealth
to their exploitative masters. Most of our people would rather accept easy credit from the banks than engage in the difficult
struggle against the money power. We are like junkies who repeatedly go after another high rather than making the painful
but life-saving choice to kick the habit.
Usury and the Corruption of American Society
Jews, Respectable Conservatism and White Nationalism
World View Foundations
When people think of the Jew: they often
think of a human version of the chameleon. Since the Jew changes his spots to suit whatever cause he may currently think would
be in his, and his tribes best interests to support. This is basically as MacDonald has outlined in his series of books about
a Jewish group evolutionary function. This is why one often hears those who are racially aware rail against 'Communist Jews',
'Capitalist Jews', 'Anarchist Jews', 'Conservative Jews' and so on, but more recently there has been a new insidious trend
emerging in form of 'White Nationalist Jews'...
Yes, folks... the Jews have decided that White Nationalism is a threat
to them, and they have begun their infiltration of it by offering Jewish support to certain pro-Jewish segments of it. These
segments are corrupt and greedy for any power as they are have decided to take these thirty pieces of silver from the Jew
in order to fulfil their own lusts, and desires [too long in the wilderness perhaps?]. Or perhaps to make themselves more
'respectable', because they have Jews involved and hence they can't be 'anti-Semitic' or 'Nazis' any more: can they?
so-called 'White Nationalists' who accept these thirty pieces of silver from the Jew are not 'helping save their race' as
some deluded individuals would argue. In fact by taking these bribes of power, money and 'respectability': they are doing
quite the opposite. It is impossible to deny that at the very least the 'Jewish people' have an extreme amount of influence
upon the Western world, and that the most notable bastion of this influence is in the United States. These so-called 'White
Nationalists' often accept this fact privately, and even in some cases to an extent publicly.
However; as we know from
their own writings, many of the so-called 'White Nationalist' luminaries recognise that Jews were; and are, at least partially
responsible for the destruction of White racial consciousness. This author would further add that this has contributed to
the significant deterioration of the White race soul and thus making it all the harder to stop the extinction of our people.
unquestionable fact remains [despite how annoying this is to philo-Semites] that the Jew was directly and/or indirectly responsible
for nearly all of the negative historical events/ideologies/social trends, which have caused this destruction to come about.
The Jew Marx created Communism, the Jew Lassalle screamed for Socialism, the Jew Herzl argued for Zionism, the Jew Hess ranted
about both Socialism and Zionism, the Jew Rand glorified selfishness, the Jewish Rothschild dynasty abused Capitalism, the
Jew Hefner built a pornographic business empire by exploiting White men and women, the Jew La Vey organised mass depravities
of the flesh, the Jew Freud obsessed over genitalia and the Jews Boas and Montagu claimed that Race didn't even exist. It
goes on and on and one can clearly state that the Jew is the culture destroyer not the culture bearer.
Since the Jew
tries to warp anything he touches to match his insane Semitic tastes. The so-called 'White Nationalists' would be unlikely
to dispute the above socio-politico ideologies/theories as the major players in the destruction of White Racial consciousness.
All these major socio-politico ideologies/events were the work of the Jew: as any cursory glance at biographies of these individuals
or the main works of the theories will quickly inform an interested individual.
However these 'White Nationalists' have
the obvious lack of ideological forthrightness to have the absolute commitment to the truth that White Nationalism must demand
if it is ever to be successful in saving our people. If they do not recognise the Jew as the deadliest; nay eternal, enemy
of the White race then they are failing in that commitment. If such so-called 'White-Nationalists' choose to get into bed
with the Jew then they are not only failing in their commitment to the truth, but in fact have ceased to stay even a 'White
Nationalist' in name [if they ever were to start with].
If an individual and/or group does this then they are not 'White
Nationalists', but just another part of the problem that we face. They have simply reconciled themselves with the prevailing
set of institutions, albeit for now as part of the 'official opposition' or as Bob Whittaker calls them 'respectable conservatives'.
Perhaps Whittaker's characterization isn't quite accurate for this group of so-called 'White Nationalists', and perhaps a
more fitting one might be 'respectable revolutionaries'.
A 'respectable revolutionary' is simply a 'racist respectable
conservative', but it allows the Jew to dominate its ideology: in the same way the 'respectable conservative' was corrupted
by the other incarnations of the Jew. Of course, the Jewish influence within 'respectable revolutionary' circles is likely
to be both direct [as in Jews being directly involved] and indirect [pro-Jewish theories and ideological positions being pushed/'officially
endorsed' by these circles], and hence the members of these circles/ideologies are nothing more than the latest; as William
Dudley Pelley said so well, dupes of Judah.
This changing of the Jew's spots and subsequent proliferation of dupes of
Judah can be easily evidenced by the preposterous and downright false idea that there are such creatures as 'White Jews' or
'pro-White Jews'. The Jew is pro nothing, but the Jew himself and his tribe. This should be evident by the writings of these
'pro-White Jews' such as the Jew Lawrence Auster. Who despite being a 'devout Christian' often shows his 'loyalty' to White
people by calling them 'anti-Semites' and ranting about 'anti-Semitism' and how it must be extinguished from the 'pro-White
movement'. Auster is one of these so called 'White Jews' by the way and bills himself as one of the America's most politically
incorrect 'pro-White' writers.
When someone says anything remotely critical of Jews: the Jew Auster goes off on an irrational
bent about 'anti-Semitism', and flagellates the White race about the 'Holocaust' and the 'crimes of Islam against Israel'.
much for his 'pro-White' loyalty!
As a Polish proverb once read: 'the Jew cries out in pain as he slaps you'. This holds
true for the Jew Auster and his ilk of 'pro-White Jews'. They are not White and they are not 'pro-White'. Instead they are
Jewish and are pro-Jews. If you continue to assume they are White: they will continue to slap you when you turn to deal with
the heart of the racial problem: the Jew!
If you doubt the ability of the Jewish chameleon then take a glance over Jewish
history. After all if one group has been 'persecuted relentlessly for three thousand years' then don't you think they must
be doing something to annoy a lot of different people over a significant and sustained period of time? Right?
Adolf Hitler- National Socialism and Women By Rodney Martin, Director/Editor
National Socialism"s Worldview is based on solid "traditional values" Family Values and with
those come traditional gender roles which contr5ary to Jewish decadence, strengthen the family and strengthen each gender.
The Jewish dominated Weimar Republic, like today's Jewish dominated United States, suffered from hyper divorce rates, declining
birth rates, among the White Population, escalating promiscuity, and moral decadence and degeneracy. As in Weimar and the
United States, the heart and soul of the nation was ruins. National Socialism proposes large White families the norm once
again, families in which women devoted themselves to home and children and husbands provide for the household.
The National Socialist Worldview regarding Women was best articulated by Adolf Hitler in a speech to women on September
8, 1934. It should be noted that women in German were the most devoted supporters of Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP.
Adolf Hitler's speech to the National Socialist Women's League, an NSDAP women's organization demonstrated traditional,
pragmatic and conservative thinking which National Socialism embraces.
The slogan 'Emancipation of women' was invented by Jewish intellectuals
and its content was formed by the same spirit. In the really good times of German life the German woman had no need to emancipate
herself. She possessed exactly what nature had necessarily given her to administer and preserve; just as the man in his good
times had no need to fear that he would be ousted from his position in relation to the woman. In fact the woman was
least likely to challenge his position. Only when he was not absolutely certain in his knowledge of his task did the eternal
instinct of self and race-preservation begin to rebel in women. There then grew from this rebellion a state of affairs which
was unnatural and which lasted until both sexes returned to the respective spheres which an eternally wise providence had
preordained for them. If the man's world is said to be the State, his struggle, his readiness to devote his powers to
the service of the community, then it may perhaps be said that the woman's is a smaller world. For her world is her husband,
her family, her children, and her home. But what would become of the greater world if there were no one to tend and care for
the smaller one? How could the greater world survive if there were no one to make the cares of the smaller world the content
of their lives? No, the greater world is built on the foundation of this smaller world. This great world cannot survive if
the smaller world is not stable. Providence has entrusted to the woman the cares of that world which is her very own, and
only on the basis of this smaller world can the man's world be formed and built up. The two worlds are not antagonistic. They
complement each other, they belong together just as man and woman belong together.
We do not
consider it correct for the woman to interfere in the world of the man, in his main sphere. We consider it natural if these
two worlds remain distinct. To the one belongs the strength of feeling, the strength of the soul. To the other belongs the
strength of vision, of toughness, of decision, and of the willingness to act. In the one case this strength demands the willingness
of the woman to risk her life to preserve this important cell and to multiply it, and in the other case it demands from the
man the readiness to safeguard life. The sacrifices which the man makes in the struggle of his nation, the woman makes
in the preservation of that nation in individual cases. What the man gives in courage on the battlefield, the woman gives
in eternal self-sacrifice, in eternal pain and suffering. Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle
waged for the existence of her people. And both must therefore mutually value and respect each other when they see that each
performs the task that Nature and Providence have ordained. And this mutual respect will necessarily result from this separation
of the functions of each. It is not true, as Jewish intellectuals assert, that respect depends on the overlapping of
the spheres of activity of the sexes; this respect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere
of the other. It lies in the last resort in the fact that each knows that the other is doing everything necessary to maintain
the whole community. [ . . . ] So our women's movement is for us not something which inscribes on its banner as its
program the fight against men, but something which has as its program the common fight together with men. For the new National
Socialist national community acquires a firm basis precisely because we have gained the trust of millions of women as fanatical
fellow-combatants, women who have fought for the common life in the service of the common task of preserving life, who in
that combat did not set their sights on the rights which a Jewish intellectualism put before their eyes, but rather on the
duties imposed by nature on all of us in common. Whereas previously the programs of the liberal, intellectualist women's
movements contained many points, the program of our National Socialist Women's movement has in reality but one single point,
and that point is the child, that tiny creature which must be born and grow strong and which alone gives meaning to the whole
Meditations on the Baths of Sulis-Minerva By Dr. Karl Radl
Roman baths in the aptly named town of Bath in England are a renowned world heritage site and indeed one of the best preserved
set of Roman public baths. Indeed they are; as I learned, somewhat unique because they were held to be holy baths that had
been given to man by the goddess Minerva. The Romans in a gesture to this holy nature incorporated the local Celtic goddess;
Sulis, of the hot water springs into their worship there. So thus the holy spring of the goddess Sulis became the holy baths
of the goddess Sulis Minerva.
There is something intrinsically holy about this transfer and subsequent
veneration of the goddess Sulis by the Romans as Sulis Minerva: it is hard to explain, but the fact that the Romans were not
adverse to seeing in Sulis their own goddess Minerva suggests that they were a tolerant people of other deities and tended
to see them as localised expressions of their own gods and goddesses. This expresses itself most fully at the baths of Sulis
Minerva precisely because the Romans kept that original name and joined it with their name to indicate to all and sundry that
the goddess Sulis; that has been honoured by the Celtic inhabitants, was just another name (of many) for the goddess Minerva.
Indeed when you see the various personalised monuments to different deities; other than Sulis Minerva, with and without
their local names it is hard to imagine that the Romans were supremely tolerant in matters of religion and thought of it;
largely, as an individual choice but one that had to be compatible with the Roman Imperial cult. Thus; of course, indicating
that the ‘persecution' of jews, Christians and a few other cults; such as that of Isis, is much more than their apologists
would claim, but rather the suppression of subversive religions that necessarily included a political element by either corrupting
citizens and/or residents in the Roman empire and either demanding or encouraging; by virtue of their strident belief system,
the repudiation of the Roman Imperial cult and therefore; correctly, in Roman eyes rejecting Roman governance.... DOWNLOAD
AND CONTINUE READING
Ethnic Identity versus White Identity: Differences between the U.S. and Europe
by Dr.Tom Sunic
Ethnic Identity versus White Identity: Differences between the U.S. and Europe
A clarification of terms and concepts
is in order when dealing with trendy words in the social sciences. Although the idea of identity is an ancient theme, the
word ‘identity' over the last few decades has been subject to a flurry of subjective interpretations, resulting often
in contradictory definitions. One hundred years ago, the word ‘identity' was used in forensic medicine and in police
files, but seldom in the sense of national, religious or racial identities. Therefore, today's usage of the word ‘identity'
is not always appropriate given that this word can easily elicit contradictory meanings depending on who is using it and in
what political environment. Thus, for instance, a citizen from the Federal Republic of Germany can carry multiple identities
that may complement each other, but they may also exclude each other. He can describe himself as a "good European,"
although he may be of North African or Turkish stock, and may in addition sport several other vocational identities that have
nothing in common with his racial, religious or national heritage. The question, however, is which is his primary identity
and which is his secondary identity? How does he define himself and how does the Other define him? What comes first? His racial
identity, his religious identity, his ethnic identity, his citizen awareness, or his professional affiliation? In his book
on identity, Alain de Benoist, writes about the conflicting nature of identities, adding that "the belief that identity
can be better preserved without [these] confrontations [among different identities] is nonsense. On the contrary the confrontations
make identity possible." In other words, a person asserts his identity best when he draws a sharp demarcation
line between himself and the Other, or by violently confronting the Other. Likewise, he will best identify himself with his
ingroup in so far as his ingroup differs from other out-groups. Seen from a historical point of view, the idea of identity
has always been a heated topic in the West, although this topic has been wrapped up in different words. From Homer's Ulysses
to Goethe's Faust, White Europeans and Americans have never tired of asking questions about who they were and who they are. Oswald Spengler deals with the idea of identity, although in his main work he never used that word, preferring instead the
expression "second religiousness" and avoiding reference to the race factor. In the anomic and rootless Western
societies of today, national, religious and racial identities have given way to new identities, which manifest themselves
in the worshipping of exotic and esoteric "idols" and icons, which function now as transmission belts in the new
identity-building process.Spengler adds that "to this corresponds in today's world of Europe and America the occult
and theosophical gimmicks, the American Christian Science, the mendacious salon Buddhism, the religious arts and crafts."
Such "second religiousness," or one could call it, "fake substitute identities" of uprooted masses with
no racial and no national consciousness, can often be encountered today in Western multicultural and multiracial societies.
Such identities seem to be a cherished topic of discussion among contemporary academics. Also, many self-designated White
nationalists, or, as they are labeled by the Left, "White supremacists" in America and Europe, resort to similar
substitute identities by adorning themselves with insignia and slogans going back to National Socialist Germany or to fascist
Italy. The self-perception of these new White nationalists is often embedded in a caricatured reenactment of anachronistic
infra-political activities that actually never took place in the Third Reich, but which are now projected into a surreal,
vicarious world of their own imagination, as if the reenactment of those "Nazi" activities could miraculously resurrect
the original National Socialist or Fascist state.
Talking About Race...Download and
My late friend
Sepp Mannsberger published an article entitled 'Plato and the National Socialist Ideal' under the
name 'Johann Luther' a year or two ago which deserves some comment, because it attempts to forge a link
between the ideals espoused in Plato's 'Republic' and by National Socialism. Luther
splits up his argument into five sections, which are: 'The Role of Each Man in
Society', 'Education', 'The Raising and Development of Children', 'The Life and Duties of a Guardian'
and 'The Philosopher King and the Fuehrer'. I would like to address some of the arguments put forth
in the first three sections from the perspective of National Socialism as I would
suggest Luther has made too simplistic an analysis in trying to equate the two
sets of ideals. I will not, however, address the matter from the context of Plato's work as I am informed others with
more specific knowledge will do so. To be clear I am not arguing against Luther's
thesis that there is a form of synthesis between Plato and National Socialism,
but rather that Luther has oversimplified National Socialism to make it seem that the
two ideals are closer than they, in fact, are.The Role of the Aryan in Society
Luther begins his article by asserting that one
can never be an expert in more than one profession and then goes on to state that
people are inherently suited for one kind of occupation due to their different nature in his section on 'The
Role of Each Man in Society'.
Luther here is ignoring a fundamental
point in that he hasn't defined and discussed the two terms he is using, because a profession is
not the same thing as a kind of occupation. A profession is a specific type of
employment, such as being a carpenter, a mechanic or a managerial accountant,
not a kind (i.e. type) of occupation, which would imply less specific categories such as skilled labour, unskilled labour,
managerial labour and so forth. This already makes Luther's analysis problematic,
because he is conflating two terms, which imply different things as if they are
exactly the same thing.
This vagueness comes out in his ancillary point, which is that members
of the Aryan folk, not 'people' as Luther mistakenly terms them (which is again
vague and doesn't implicitly include the recognition of race as National Socialism demands), are suited
to only one .....Download and continue reading. To comment, send a Letter to the
Editor at: email@example.com
The National Community-Essential
to our Cultural and Demographic Renewal By: Rodney Martin
The National Community
is a fundamental precept which is central to National Socialism. It could also mean "People's Community or "Volksgemeinschaft"
in German. The actual concept of "National Community" actually predates the National Socialists and was first discussed
in Germany in the 1880's.
The National Community is a critical construct so that Society can function successfully, and thus harmoniously,
as an National organism; whereby all parts benefit when each part performs the function for which it is best suited to produce
a unified, single purpose, which is then capable of outperforming any one part, the whole thus vastly increasing the powers
of all cooperating parts, and the parts therefore subordinating a part of their freedom to the whole.
This should NOT be confused with Communism, Marxism, or Leftist Socialism. The
National Community I speak of is not based on non-racial egalitarianism, but is predicated on a principal of Identity, and
social solidarity among the Folk, OUR Folk, in Germany the Folk were referred to as the Volksgenossen. What the National Socialists
in Germany developed was a National Community for Germans; we must be a National Community for European-Americans, based on
our unique identity. We must do so proudly and without fear.
the National Community no part advances at the expense of any other part. The wealthy class does not advance at the expense
of the workers or vice versa. No policy is tolerated which is destructive to the National Community as a whole. National Socialism
is therefore defined as preservation of a solvent, national, and independent economy on the one hand with the assurance of
the social rights of the workers on the other.
This might at
first seem like a Utopian pipe-dream except for the fact that it was actually implemented successfully in National Socialist
Germany and it worked from 1933 to 1945, much to the chagrin of the plutocratic Jewish world capitalists in London and New
York and the primitive Jewish Communists in Moscow.
reality, what distinguished Karl Marx from the millions who were affected in the same way was, in a world already in a state
of gradual decomposition, Marx used his keen powers of prognosis to detect the essential poisons, so as to extract them and
concentrate them, with the art of a necromancer, in a solution which would bring about the rapid destruction of the independent
nations on the globe."(Adolf
Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol.2 Ch.1)
Zionist doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength
by the mass of numbers and their dead weight. Thus it denies the value of personality in man and his culture. As a foundation
of the universe, this doctrine would bring about the end of any order intellectually conceivable to man. And as, in this greatest
of all recognizable organisms, the result of an application of such a law could only be chaos, on earth it could only be destruction
for the inhabitants of this planet".(Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol.1 Ch.2)
The world-plan of Jewish Zionism is now in full operation. We see the absolute
dissolution of other great societies, especially the rapidly declining Western Societies of Europe and America through Political
Correctness, Multiculturalism, Cultural Genocide, and Cultural Marxism. We see the abolition of frontiers through unchecked
Third World Immigration into Europe and America and by way of so-called Free Trade agreements which benefit large multi-national
corporations which have reduced the White Working Class to abject poverty and into a race to the bottom and to the Jewish
Pawn Brokers to pawn what little they have left. We see International Jewish Bankers purchasing all the so called leaders
without encountering any significant opposition by virtue of their control of the media and the levers of power in general.
Imagine, for a moment, the prospect of success of any
candidate for any office in any U.S. election who is not a "friend of Israel". We see the "abolishing of private
property", not directly but indirectly, through reducing all industry and commerce to Stock Exchange speculation and
through immanent domain. You may think you own your home but the government can take that away through immanent domain or
by increasing the property tax to a point beyond reach.
Socialism discerned the true purpose of the State:
the first cause for the preservation of our species and formation of human communities; thus the state is a national organism
and not an economic organization. A difference which is just as large as it is incomprehensible, particularly to our so-called
' statesmen ' of today. That is why they think they can build up the state through economics while in reality it results and
always will result solely from the action of those qualities which lie in line with the will to preserve the species and race."Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf Vol. 1 Ch. 4
Nationalism requires a principle of social organization in order to be successful. The alternative is to build on
a system of economic organization which treats the population as socially atomized economic units and not as a collective
organic entity. We can contrast these two by the terms Organic Statism and Economic Statism.
"Organic cultures are typified most importantly by a chain of being. In
such circumstances, an individual sees himself as one link in a family that extends back through innumerable generations,
usually ending in a mythical creation story that connects him with the supernatural, early Romans, for instance, could often
recite their ancestry back dozens of generations, ending with one of the Gods or Heroes of their mythology. Such an individual
also looks to the future and adjusts his time preferences to account for the needs of future generations. Respect of one's
ancestors and concern for one's descendants are thus wrapped together in a religious and culture milieu that is of profound
importance in everyday life. These families are linked to other, similar families through the bonds of culture and religion.
Together, they see themselves as a unique "tribe" moving through history toward some final destiny."Statism, Post-Modernism, and the Death of the Western World, LaTulippe-2006
Economic Statism, on the other hand, cares nothing for the preservation of the
culture. In fact, it leads to self-genocide:
a man has food stamps, a welfare check, and a place in a government housing project, it believes he has everything he could
possibly need or want......Post-modern culture treats children as an expensive and peculiar hobby, something like a curious
fashion statement. Children are, after all, expensive, messy, and they interfere with an active dating life. And if children
are seen as a mere fashion accessory or an emotional indulgence, then one will do just as well as two and much better than
three or four. This attitude reveals itself in the demographic statistics of all societies that have adopted post-modernism.
Across the Western world and some unfortunate parts of Asia, there has been a catastrophic collapse in birthrates. Over the
next few decades, parts of Europe may see their populations fall in half."Statism, Post-Modernism, and the Death of the Western World, LaTulippe-2006
How do we escape this fate?
Our hour is late and far too many mistakes have been made. We can begin by recognizing
that Nationalism can NEVER be victorious without a solid principle of social organization.
The National Community as perfected by National Socialism is both a viable solution and our salvation and our only
path to cultural and demographic rebirth.
World View Foundations Director Rodney Martin attended
a June 18 City Council Meeting and spoke in favor of rescinding the Mayor's "Gay Pride Proclamation", which
she had proclaimed on June 4th and signed on her own without support from other Councilmembers.This "Gay Pride"
Proclamtion effoirt was led by a local "homosexual militiawhose primary ring leadre is a Jew. Yes, as I have writen,
the Gay Agenda is a Jew Agenda".
meeting was civil, with the exception of a few emotional outbursts and attempted interruptions of pro-rescinding speakers
by the LGBT militia, thus demonstrating who the real bullies. We also learned that Homosexual Activists have added yet another
letter to their acronym and now call themselves "LGBTQ" -Lesbian-Gay-Bi-Transgender-Queer, all of which demonstrate
fundamentally disagreeing with the emotionally charged illogic of their arguments, some of the stories put forth by the
LGBT-Q advocates heart wrenching. Stories of parents "throwing their children out of the house" and children who
have to stand by in silence while their parents and family "trash who and what they are". Interestingly the LGBTQ
advocates refuse to acknowledge that they often are the cause of many divided families by injecting their agenda into the
privacy of family matters and they themselves are often all too willing to "trash" family members who do not share
their views, often labeling them with artificial Orwellian terms such as "homophobes".
The LGBT-Q militia also abused and insulted the Christian faith and in many cases
attempted to miss-cite Christian scripture to their means, as they have attempted to fuse their agenda to other unrelated
issues and causes.
While it is a fact that Christianity
is a religion of forgiveness and love, Christianity does indeed condemn homosexuality in both the Old and New Testaments,
Leviticus is cleat as is Romans 1:26-27 and Christ did indeed waive the Law of Moses provide the sin ended, Christ did NOT
"LGBT-Q" advocates seek to establish themselves as a Special protected Class, over and above others based solely
on sexual acts with members of the same sex. They have yet to find logical, compelling and rational arguments to make their
case because there are none and result to name calling and attacking when confronted by those who refuse to surrender deeply
held beliefs enshrined in centuries of Western Christian Civilization. Thus far the LGBTQ militia have relied on political
bullying tactics, enforced Marxist political correctness and solace in the bosoms of homosexual judges. The City of Porterville
has shown the way that many other can follow, we have stood up and said no more.
"JEWISH AUTONOMOUS REGION" RAINBOW FLAG
"LGBTQ" RAINBOW FLAG
THE HOMOSEXUAL "RAINBOW"-JEW
World View Foundations
has written, calling attention to the fact that the "homosexual agenda is in reality a Jew Agenda; see our article, "The
Homosexual Agenda is a Jewish Agenda". The Homosexual adopted their own "flag", the "Rainbow"
flag, more often than not in many areas of West Hollywood, California, San Francisco, California and other homosexual infested
cities, the homosexual rainbow flag takes precedence over the U.S. and State flags as the homosexuals often proclaim "Queer
Nation" and like Jews, hold themselves out as a State within a State.
BUT...where did the inspiration for the "queer Rainbow Flag REALLY comes from...Jews of course.
See two photos above, the first is the so called "LGBTQ" Rainbow
Flag, the other "Rainbow Flag" photo is non-other than the Flag of the "Jewish Autonomous Region" established
by Joseph Stalin in 1934.
The Jewish Autonomous Oblast is located in the Russian Far East on the Chinese boarder. Stalin relocated the Jews in
Russia there so they could no longer crate mischief. The number of colors on the Jewish Autonomous Oblast Rainbow Flag
is meant to symbolize the seven-branched Jewish Menorah.
This is very ironic, as both "Rainbow Flags" represent
groups that seek act as "States within a State" and have worked tirelessly to destroy Western Christian Civilization,
one as the master and the other as a weapon.
WHITE CHRISTIANS MUST END THE JEWISH INQUISITION
Rodney Martin, Director/Editor
World View Foundations
June 17, 2013
As White Christians
we must retake our Church as well as our Nation.
Fear is powerful.
Jews use fear because fear is the most effective weapon. Fear is what has kept our fellow European-American kindred from acting
in their own interests for the last 50 years and most importantly, fear is what has stopped White Christians from acing in
the best interests of their children and grandchildren.
openly, without fear and am thus open with my Ethno-Nationalist Worldview, because of this, some distant relatives do not
attend family gatherings at my home and former business associates no longer socialize with me since I retired and now devote
all my time to my family, Revisionist History and Ethno-Nationalist politics. This does not bother me, my wife and our children
in the least.
I would much rather proudly speak and stand for
the truth, historical justice and intellectual honesty rather than allow the fear of being ostracized by shallow, spiritually
defective and intellectually dishonest people, who themselves are enslaved, control my thoughts, deeds, and beliefs. Presently,
this is the kind of society that we live in. We are told to sit down, shut up, and be a good little goyim sheep and if we
don't, we will be punished by the Jewish masters.
As I have
grown older and wiser I have become much more disciplined in selecting the right conflicts when it comes to discussions on
race, religion, and history. I have also become much more strategic in my approach. However I like my German ancestors, am
totally incapable and refuse to ignore lies, double standards false propaganda and find it simply impossible to not do something
about the obvious Ethno-Injustice perpetrated on MY PEOPLE by the Jews and the Marxist-Left.
Today, the vast majority of White Christians are good decent people but are scared and brainwashed. Today, White
Christians are scared of even whispering a word about racial issues or heaven forbid be heard criticizing Jews and Israel.
White Christians know if they do, they will automatically be labeled an "anti-Semite" or a "Nazi" as part
of the Jewish Inquisition. They will also be deprived of their precious memberships in social organizations like Rotary and
the Chamber of Commerce, will be disinvited from their favorite social engagements, find longtime friends suddenly "lost"
and lose business relationships and livelihood. This is the Jewish Inquisition for opposition to Jews. As an Ethno-Nationalist
who is also a Christian, I have seen all of this as well. In fact, one Church once shunned my wife because she said she shard
my views, but made sure to send the tithing request the following week.
White Christians today are programed to automatically condemn books such as "My Awakening" and "Mein
Kampf" even though they most likely have never opened and read a page of either book. Many White Christians today proudly
proclaim that they have no problem with interracial relationships, even as they cry in private as their beautiful daughters
are ravaged by a black beast and are then left alone emotionally, physically, and economically devastated with several mixed-race
offspring void of identity. Today, White Christians will proclaim, through artificial smiles, they don't believe in racial
differences or they believe that as long as someone is a Christian they will be a productive citizen because salvation through
Christ is attainable for anyone of any race.
Being a Christian
doesn't make someone more intelligent, less lazy, or less violent.
Sunday many Christians go to church, put on an artificial happy faces for their friends and the preacher and sing the hymns,
and praise our Lord and then go home and verbally, mentally, and physically abuse their wives and children. This happens more
than people realize. Some people are simply more capable of controlling their actions whether they are a Christian or not.
Our Blood is what matters. Our Genes are what matter. Race matters.
a Christian does not make a people more capable of creating and sustaining a nation either. Norway is not a great country
because its population is Christian. According to recent statistics only 20% of Norway's population goes to church on a regular
basis. White Nations are not successful because they are Christian. White Nations are successful because of our genetics and
blood. Our Genetics and our blood is what have created greatness around the world.
Christianity has been the overwhelming religion in the Western world but no amount of Christian evangelism will ever
make Blacks and Mestizos our neither equal nor capable of creating anything that resembles what the White European Peoples
have created. Genetically, Blacks and Mestizos lack the intellectual and social construct to create and sustain civilized
societies equal to that of any Nation created by White Peoples. This is not hate, this is historical fact. This is not hate,
this is science and realism. History demonstrates when Blacks are left to fend strictly for themselves, absent White people
providing them care and guidance, the areas in which they reside turn into uncivilized wastelands. What happened when Rhodesia
became Zimbabwe and the transfer from Apartheid South Africa to ANC South Africa are shining examples. In 2011 the top 10
most livable states in the United States were New Hampshire, Utah, Wyoming, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, Vermont, Idaho,
and North Dakota. With the exception of New Jersey, with a White population of 66%, all of these States are overwhelmingly
White and if the White population in New Jersey continues to decline, it is a scientific fact that the living conditions in
New Jersey will worsen. The most violent and dangerous places in the United States are populated by Blacks and Mestizos, Detroit,
Chicago and Los Angeles are prime examples.
do not like talking about race, because of Jewish induced fear. White Christians indeed know the truth about race. White Christians
would much rather avoid the topic altogether, again because of fear. White Christians would rather ignore reality in order
to feel comfortable in their own, sometimes isolated little world. The problem with this White Christians world, like all
other White world is shrinking rapidly and within 25 years, every White person is going to realize that race does matter and
that their silence is their genocide. "White flight" within 10 years will no longer be a plausible reaction to the
demographic crisis besieging the United States simply because there won't be any place else to flee. White People are going
to be forced to make a stand as White people, Christian or not.
people subconsciously are already following racial instincts every time they move from an area with a growing non-White population
to another more "demographically pleasing" area with the proverbial "nice neighbors" "safe streets",
"nice schools", etc. These White people may not admit it, but it is happening and more and more often.
White Christians most definitely don't like talking about the Jewish issue and
most will completely ignore or deny the fact that Jews dominate Hollywood and the mainstream media, even though the Jews openly
admit their domination of Hollywood and the media. Most of today's Christian leaders and preachers are nothing but Jewish
Trojan Horses whose role is to herd the goyim and to appease organized Jewry so funds keep flowing into their Christian-Zionist
congregations and so that the Jewish-Zionist Agenda is secure. These leaders preach the poison of White Guilt and multiculturalism
whereby all races can and must live together in harmony as long as they all believe in Christ, except for the Jews who must
maintain their own unique identity. White Christians are told it is perfectly acceptable for Jews to preserve their ethnic
and cultural identity but not the White goyim who must embrace multiculturalism.
Miscegenation and non-White third world immigration are supported by international and organized Jewry. Miscegenation,
non-White third world immigration and the resulting incredibly high and often violent non-White crime are destroying our European
Ethnicity, our Culture and our children's future and the vast majority of White Christians are doing nothing in response to
it because they are scared of the Jewish Orwellian Inquisition.
Christians are afraid to speak the truth because to do so they would be forced to publically reject the conditioning they
have been forcibly programmed to believe since they were a child, even though in their heart they do not believe it and know
it is not right.
Breaking physical chains is much easier than
breaking mental chains, but it can and must be done. Many White Christians have been infected with Zionist lies and false
propaganda preached by false prophets like Jon Hagee, Glenn Beck and many other Jewish shills. In accepting the preaching
of false prophets, many White Christians have turned their backs on the true Christian Saints of the past like Martin Luther.
Christianity originally confronted the Jew, opposed usury and took pride in our blood. The Zionist-Christian false prophets
today are leading White Christians to their own enslavement and to their own destruction. False Prophets like Hagee, Beck
and others preach anyone who doesn't bow to Jews and Israel is an evil anti-Semite despite the fact that Talmud slanders Jesus
and the Virgin Mary. Jews today celebrate the Crucifixion of Christ and many Jews today would gladly crucify Christ all over
again, and have said so, if they got the chance.
Christians break the Jewish mental chains and end the Jewish Inquisition and realize that the only real salvation and future
for their children and grandchildren is a nation free from Jewry, the current nightmare will begin to change.
As a Christian I do not blame fellow White people, Pagans and Non-Believers for
criticizing Christians for what has become of White nations over the last 50 years. The vast majority of Christians have surrendered
their once great and holy faith to the anti-Christ Jews. Many White Christians have engaged in a twisted form of self-genocide
of White people all over the world and someday they will either realize that they have been duped or they will be held to
account by their posterity. In any event, it is undeniable that the actions and indifference of White Christians on the issue
of Race, Culture, and their own Children's future has largely contributed to the destruction of White/European nations.
Unless White Christians want our children to be enslaved by the Jewish masters
who are currently pulling the strings in our own homelands, White Christians must stand up and throw off the Jewish chains
so that they can truly be free.
Unless White Christians want our children to eventually be raped and murdered by the Third World Hoard, White Christians
must stand up and throw off the Jewish chains so that they can truly be free.
As White Christians we must retake our Church as well as our Nation.
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS WRITES ATTORNEY
GENERAL RE: RECOVERY OF ALFRED ROSENBERG'S STOLEN DIARY
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
June 10, 2013
HONORABLE ERIC HOLDER
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE
950 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, N.W.
WASHINGTON D.C. 20530-0001
Re: Recovery and Disposition of Personal Property of Alfred Rosenberg
Dear Attorney General Holder:
I am writing
you as both a historian of historical events and as a historian of juris prudence.
Today Reuters News Service announced that Federal Agencies, which you have federal law enforcement oversight over,
will announce this week, the "recovery" of some 400 pages from the Diary of former Reichs Minister Alfred Rosenberg.
It is not necessary to cloud the issue with the modern emotional arguments of the "Holocaust" or the National
Socialist Government which Alfred Rosenberg was a legal official in accordance with the German Constitution which predated
the 1933 National Socialist election victory in 1932 and subsequently coming to power in 1933. These issues have nothing
to do with the legal issue of the disposition of the recovery of stolen personal property.
At issue, is the disposition of the now recovered stolen personal property of Alfred Rosenberg. The diary was NOT
an official government document, nor was it used as evidence at the Nuremberg Trials. The diary pages are personal property
which were stolen from Alfred Rosenberg. This personal property was stolen from Mr. Rosenberg AFTER the cessation of hostilities
and according to a preponderance of the evidence, was stolen by Robert Kempner, who was on the staff of the Nuremberg Prosecution.
Under any logical reading of Law, Kempner either 1) stole evidence (which was never used and thus should have been returned
to Rosenberg's widow), or 2) stole a prisoner's personal property.
any event, the diary pages must NOT now be summarily gifted to the United States Holocaust Museum or any other entity absent
consultation with the Rosenberg Family/Estate who are legally afforded an opportunity to file acclaim to recover its rightful
Legal precedent has already been set by the United
States to provide for the consultation with the Rosenberg Estate/Family.
Currently, the Justice Dept. and United States Courts affords families and estates the opportunity to file claims
on art which was legally sold, traded, or exchanged in Europe from 1933-1945, when a piece of Art from this era is identified,
families and estates are afforded the opportunity to file claims. One such high profile case involved the late Elizabeth
Taylor who owned a piece of "disputed Art" which she refused to return to the Estate of the prior 1930's era owner.
The Rosenberg Family/Estate must be afforded the same equal
protection in accordance with this precedent and with equal protection provisions of the U.S. Constitution. The United States
has recovered stolen property, illegally taken from Alfred Rosenberg, thus the diary pages are NOT the property of the United
States or any Museum nor does the Unites States have unilateral discretion to dispose of the diary pages or gift them.
In the alternative to the Rosenberg Estate/Family, the diary pages should be turned over to the BundesArchive of the Federal
Republic of Germany.
Thank you in advance for your professional
consideration to this matter.
World View Foundations
Embassy-Federal Republic of Germany
Republic of Germany
HOAXES- BE CONSISTENT AND DON'T BE A TOOL
Rodney Martin, Director
World View Foundations
I would like
to make my position clear on "Hoaxes" and "False Flags", yes they are conducted by the Power Elite.
911 was a False Flag, conducted by the Jewish Power Elite, Boston was another.
Tonkin Gulf was a False Flag. There have many more throughout history.
murder of Lee Rigby, a White British Subject, was NOT. With that said, the murder of Lee Rigby
was NOT part of a broad Islamic terror war as is being portrayed, this "media spin" is propaganda to divert attention
away from the real issue. Multiculturalism, open borders, unchecked immigration and the FORCED blending of
incompatible peoples and cultures that should NOT be blended, i.e. the Jewish Agenda is what killed Lee Rigby. Attacks,
murder, and rapes by Blacks and Browns on Whites in Britain and in Europe have been wide spread for years and have been down
played and un reported. White people who have dared to speak out have been arrested and prosecuted for "Hate Crimes"
and "inciting Racial Hatred", sometimes years after they made statements like "immigrants have not been good
for my Country".
of the murder of Lee Rigby by Black, African Immigrant Muslims, Jews ( such as Morris) had posted online videos telling Whites
that it was "all a Hoax" and a "False Flag", why ? Because for years the Jewish
Agenda has been supported by the mainstream media in NOT reporting violent attacks on Whites by Black and Brown Immigrants
or even on homosexuals.
any crime by a White on a "hapless Brown or Black receives overblown National media attention in order to jinn up support
for Multicultural Hate Crime Laws. Question, has ANYONE who now says the murder of Lee Rigby is a "Hoax
has also declared the overly reported crimes by Whites on Blacks or Browns or the "so called murder of Matthew Shepard"
were all hoaxes? Why accept alleged White on Brown/Black/Homosexual Crimes as real and the murder of White
Lee Rigby as a HOAX, especially when declaring the Lee Rigby murder as a non-event only benefits the Jewish Cultural Marxist
Jews do not want Whites outraged
I will leave all you good thinking people
with a challenge, be consistent, if you are willing to declare Black/Brown on White Crime as "Hoaxes", then
you must declare ALL overtly and overly overly reported White on Black/Brown crime which is used to Jinn up anti-White Laws
as all Hoaxes as well. You must do this, especially in light of the fact that crime statistics do not support those overtly
over reported White on Black/Brown crime.
Do NOT be a unwitting tool in the Jewish Multicultural Agenda, do NOT allow Jews
to make the murder, rape and attacks on our people as "non-events" by exploiting, distorting, and infiltrating
the Truth Movement.
May 26, 2013 AN OPEN
LETTER TO WHITE WORKING CLASS AMERICANS
have been betrayed and you know it.....
Working Class White Americans:
The political class and
ruling elite in Washington D.C and in your State Houses have for years been completely out of touch and sold you and our Nation
out to special interests and in many cases, foreign interests. YOUR Government, its bureaucracy, and its policy are run by
an intellectual class, dominated by dual-citizens and trained in left-wing universities who have contempt for the White Working
Class Americans. These Bureaucrats have rarely held real jobs, have rarely served in the military, rarely have
families, and rarely have lives outside of "politics and policy making". These un-American power elite
rarely abide by the draconian laws and "regulations" they impose.
For years the White Working Class placed its hopes in the
Democrat and Republican Parties. Both of these political parties have long ago written off the White Working Class as they
sought to capitalize on the new "dynamics of demographics", otherwise known as Racial and Economic Politics. The
Democrats saw more value in Third World Immigration from political point of view while Republicans viewed it as an outstanding
source of cheap labor. Both the Democrats and Republicans collaborated TOGETHER beginning with the 1965 Immigration Act, as
they are AGAIN doing today, to make Third World Immigration as easy as possible at the expense and peril of the White Working
Class. THEY BOTH SOLD YOU OUT.
the Democrat and the Republican establishments have attacked and attempted to marginalize those of us who have opposed and
warned of the negative effects of Third World immigration on our Nation, People, and Culture as, "Racist", "Crazy",
"Loons" and worse, yet we are and have been right. You, the White Working Class are proof,
you have lost your once great standard of living to low wage Third World workers, you have lost
your quality of life, no longer do you feel safe having your children play in the front yard, if you have one, let alone walking
to and from schools (which now have to teach multiple languages to non-citizens) in neighborhoods infested with "ethnic
violence" which did not used to exist. The list can go on. If you are a White Working Class American, you are an endangered
species and you know it, your Government holds you in
contempt as a matter of policy.
for you to leave behind your former political traditions before it is too late. It is time for you to advocate for your interests
as White Working Class Americans, it is time for you to advocate as American Ethno-Nationalists, just like newly
arrived immigrants advocate based on "their ethno-interests", which you pay for. It's time for
you to put your family ahead of artificial multiculturalism that is pounded into your heads every day via Hollywood,
so called "mainstream media" and the very corrupt political system that has betrayed you so they can
continue to displace you from your own Nation. Ask yourselves, "Who really speaks for me?" It's time
for White Working Class American to unite and in so doing, take OUR Country back and expel the foreign influences that have
corrupted our institutions.
Join us, join the American Nationalist
Rodney Martin Contact us at: firstname.lastname@example.org
CALL TO ACTION
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS TO PICKET RUSSIAN CONSULATE
IN SUPPORT OF KONIGSBERG
View Foundations has been supporting the Baltic Republican Party's efforts to rename the present City of Kaliningrad back
to its rightful historical name of Konigsberg. The Baltic Republican Party has for over a year engaged in street activism,
holding Konigsberg and East Prussian Parades as well as petitions to Russian officials. This has resulted in the Regional
Government forming a Working Group to develop requisite Laws to change the name.
The Baltic Republican Party needs our help. We need to show the Russian Federation that this effort enjoys international
support. Our objective is to hold a picket outside the official Russian Consulate in San Francisco, complete with East Prussian
flags, World View Foundations will provide the flags, and signs calling for the renaming of the City. It should be noted that
Kaliningrad is the last major Russian City (Kaliningrad is not historically a Russian City) that still is named after a Communist
The idea of this Picket is to draw local and Regional
media attention which will feed onto the major news wires. This should not be hard to do, given the focus the media has been
given any protest involving Russia and Putin lately.
World Cup is slated for Kaliningrad for 2018, we should also be sending 3-mails to the World Cup demanding they NOT hold the
World Cup in the City if it is still named after a criminal Communist official, Mikhail Kalinin, and to do so would be sanctioning
Kalinin the man and Kalinin the Communist and Kalinin's crimes.
will have a Petition at the Picket for people passing by to sign supporting the name change AND calling on the World Cup to
boycott the City as long as it honors Kalinin.
This will be
a 1-Day Picket, taking place from approximately 12Noon to 4PM on a weekday
The date has not yet been determined, we are presently looking at the last week of June, so as to give everyone who
wishes to participate time to plan.
This is a unique opportunity
to help Comrade in Konigsberg who are seeking to correct one of the many injustices of 1945
This not only will provide much needed media attention for our Russian Comrades, it will also serve to educate many
as to the injustices committed against Germans in 1945, i.e. ethnic cleansing and stolen lands.
If you would like to take part in this picket please contact: email@example.com
We presently have 5 people confirmed to participate, we would like to have 10 to
If you cannot participate, due to distance, but know someone
close, please forward this email far and wide to your friends and Comrades.
The initial plan is for everyone to assemble at a predetermined location near the Consulate to plan and prepare at
10AM the morning of the picket.
Putin and Russia has not been
receiving good press lately, thus our effort should be well received by both the locals and the press. After all, the Russians
changed the name of Leningrad back to St. Petersberg, and Stalingrad to Volgograd --why not Konigsberg?
Here is my interview this past Friday with Mr. Vasiliev of the Baltic Republican
LETS STOP BLOGGING ABOUT WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO US AND START DOING
SOMETHING ABOUT IT
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS HONORS MACHINE
GUNNER LEE RIGBY By: Rodney Martin, Director World View Foundations WWW.WVFOUNDATIONS.ORG
Lee Rigby was 25 years old and a father of a two-year old
son Jack. Lee Rigby joined the British Army in 2006 and served with distinction in Cyprus, Afghanistan, and Cyprus. His final
duty station was as a recruiter in the Tower of London. "Riggers", as his Platoon Comrades affectionately called
him, was well thought of by all who knew him and became an accomplished member of the Corps of Drums.
On May 22, 2013, Lee Rigby's son, Jack lost his father, whether he will have any
memories of his father is doubtful at his young age, Lee Rigby's wife lost her husband, Lee Rigby's parents lost their son
and the British Empire lost a dedicated soldier, NOT in combat, but in the streets of London as a result of multiculturalism.
Lee Rigby was violently attacked, in London the capital of his Nation, by Negroid Muslims and with cell and smart phone
cameras filming; Lee Rigby's head was decapitated with a meat cleaver by sub-human Negroid Muslims who never should have been
in London to begin with. The attackers who enjoy special status, due to their skin color and their immigrant status in today's
United Kingdom, shouted threats to bystanders, "You and your children will be next" as
well as "hate speech", threats and speech which White British Subjects are often arrested for, sometimes years after
the alleged utterances.
Lee Rigby is not the first victim
of multiculturalism, but he is the first whose violent death has been filmed and cannot be denied nor covered up by the so
called "main stream media" by omission. The whole world has seen the Negroid Muslim on film with blood on one hand
and a meat cleaver on the other and shouting, "You and your children will be next". Western
Christian World, Europe and the United States should take heed; the attack on Lee Rigby was not a mere criminal act or an
The brutal attack and murder
of Lee Rigby was an act of racial war that has been ongoing, which transcends geographic borders, directed against White Western
Christian Civilization by Third World Non Whites orchestrated by Jewry. Lee Rigby is the first official recorded causality.
We have a right to defend our own and demand our own be defended. The battle lines are now obvious, anyone who seeks
to import more enemies are our enemies as well. Our preservation is at stake.
REAL NATIONALIST & REVISIONIST ACTIVISM - IN RUSSIA
American Nationalists can learn from these
Rodney Martin will
interview (2) Representatives of the Baltic Republican Party on World View Conversations on Friday May 24, 2013
The Baltic Republican Party, a Regional Nationalist Party in the Kaliningrad Oblast
in Russia, formally Konigsberg, East Prussia, has been working to return the City's name to Konigsberg and restore the City's
European/Germanic Heritage. The Baltic Republican Party has faced overwhelming odds, a hostile Russian government and
political system, Russian President Putin's efforts to change the former Konigsbergs demographics from European Russians to
South Asian Muslims, this was first reported to U.S. audiences in a World View Foundations interview with Baltic Republican
Party Representative Rustum Vasiliev.
The Baltic Republican
Party has engaged in a number of public activities, including petitioning the Kaliningrad Regional Government, leading "Konigsberg
Parades", holding anti-Lenin Protests.
On May 1, the official
May Day Celebrations in Russia, the Baltic Republican Party conducted a "May1-Konigsberg Parade", complete with
East Prussian Flags, and the playing of "Prussian Gloria".
Despite a hostile political
environment and despite the historical injustice, the Soviet/Russian expropriation of East Prussia, the Nationalist Hero's
of the Baltic Republican Party took to the streets, waving East Prussian Flags and singing Prussian songs and demanding that
East Prussia once again be East Prussia.
It should be noted that today's politically correct vassal
state of Germany has refused to support the Baltic Republican Party's efforts and even ask for the return of historically
Prussian/German lands, the birthplace of Kant, that were unjustly taken from them.
Today, the Baltic Republican Party is seeking Justice for East
Prussia and Justice for East Prussians....
EAST PRUSSIAN SEPARATIST MOVEMENT TAKING ROOT
Those of us who remain outraged at the
theft of German lands east of the Oder, should support the brave Comrades of the Baltic Republican Party, a outright East
Prussian Separatist Movement in Konigsberg. This Party submitted a Petition to the Putin Regime calling for the renaming of
Kaliningrad to its original, rightful and Germanic name of Konigsberg. This Party also held a "Prussian Parade in Konigsberg
in July of 2012. This Party has been and is very visable and is engaging in real activism in a Nation (Russia) where the message
of Prussian Sepratism is not welcomed.
The Baltic Republican
Party has also called on Russian President Putin to make good on his promise to fund the rebuilding of the former Konigsberg
Palace which was destroyed by the Soviets in 1945.
We have posted
an interview with the Chairman of the Baltic Republican Party as our Video of the Week. In this interview, he calls for a
Photos of the Baltic Republican
Party's "Prussian Parade" can be viewed on their site at:
The following is an extensive exhaustive list of JEWS which clearly demonstrates
that the radical
and aggressive homosexual movement in the
United States is a Jewish movement.
Jews created it and operate
it from top to bottom and from within many facets of our Society and
Jews have been advocating homosexuality, since they arrived in the United States from
Weimar Germany in the 1930's.
The Jewish Homosexual Agenda is one of perversion and degeneracy that has spread like
a wildfire through every facet of American Culture. The list below should be read very
closely as many
of these Jew activists, such
as Dr. Donald I. Abrams, also advocated for other "causes",
as "medical marijuana" which have led to he destruction of our moral foundation. A close read
of the names, occupations, and professions reveals, Jews infiltrate every aspect
of American life, as they did in Weimar Germany in order to subvert
once proud and clean Institutions,
and Social Norms. Jews and homosexuals use deceptive organizational names, such as
"The Human Rights Campaign", and others.
as Jews did in Weimar Germany, they have done in the United States, they first made perversion into a
"persecuted class", and now "mainstream" by twisted and distorted
use of the media, the subversion of our
political and legal
systems and then extreme political and legal pressure on medical sciences and educations
systems via Marxist political correctness enforced by state-sponsored coercion. In Germany, it required a strong
Nationalist response to save and restore German Culture, we should expect
nothing different in the United States.
The List is all Jews:
Larry Kramer, Co-founder of "Act
Up," a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men's Health Crisis
Alan Klein, Co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation,
National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the
Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, GLAAD. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM
Kantrowitz, Co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation AKA: GLAAD.
Jonathan D. Katz, founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest
queer studies institute in the world and a
homosexual political activist, was a co-founder of "Queer Nation" in San Francisco.
Harvey Fierstein, film actor
and well-known homosexual activist.
Kaufman, playwright and film director, member of the homosexual Laramie Project.
Israel Fishman, founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970, today- the
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and
Transgendered Round Table
of the American Library Association, the world's first gay professional organization.
Bella Abzug and Edward
Koch, both New York Jews, were the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives
to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation in
Stachelberg, political director, Human Rights Campaign.
Michael S. Aronowitz, Member,
The Log Cabin Republicans.
Tony Kushner, gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright.
Hirsch, president of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.
Barbara Raab , an NBC-TV producer;
a "Jewish lesbian feminist journalist, writer."
Charles Kaiser, author & founding member of "National
Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association", NLGJA.
David Goodstein, owner/publisher of the major homosexual
magazine "The Advocate" from 1975 to1985 and co-founder
of the "National Gay Rights Lobby".
Judy Wieder, Editor-in-chief, The Advocate homosexual magazine.
Bechdel, Cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly comic strip "Dykes to Watch Out For."
Koffler, Editor-in-chief, Genre homosexual magazine.
Garrett Glaser ,National Lesbian
and Gay Journalists Association, NLGJA, National Board Member.
Ronald Gold, reporter for Variety;
a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association's
policy that homosexuality is an illness.
Magnus Hirschfeld, early gay rights activist in Germany;
founded one of the first gay rights organizations and
Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term "transvestism"; fled National Socialist Germany.
Rights Campaign" Board of Directors
Hochberg, Deputy Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign Michael Berman, Mitchell Gold ,Marty Lieberman, Andy Linsky, Dana Perlman, Abby
Rubenfeld, Andrew Tobias, Lara Schwartz Human Rights Campaign Staff Senior Counsel, Heather Wellman, Field Coordinator
Dan Furmansky, Senior Field Organizer, West Sally Green, Associate Field Director
Rick Rosendall , President,
Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC.
Barney Frank, Former U.S. Congressman, D-Ma, helped create
non-discriminatory, homosexual protection, employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies. Frank was disciplined by Congress
for allowing homosexual prostitution activities to be conducted out of his official Congressional office.
Lobel, Executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
Robin Margolis, American coordinator
of the Bi Women's Cultural Alliance and author of "Bisexuality: A Practical Guide".
Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal
Defense and Education Fund as well as he the Executive Director of Freedom to Marry.
Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation:
GLAAD: Board & Staff
Jennifer Einhorn, Communications Director, Nancy Alpert, Treasurer, Judy Gluckster,
David Huebne, Counsel, Scott Seomin, Entertainment & Media Coordinator Meg Moritz, Ph.D. , Director and member of
the Executive Committee
of Directors Gene Falk, Chair of the Board of Directors, and business executive; Senior Vice President
of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk. Board
Members - Stephen M. Jacoby, Matt Riklin, Judy Gluckster, Carol Rosenfeld, William Weinberger, Tanya Wexler,
Goldstein, Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics
Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays , PFLAG.
Staff Ron Schlittler, Director of Field & Policy, Craig Ziskin, Deputy Director of Development, Debra
Weill, Senior Field & Policy Coordinator,
Board of Direcors Leon Weinstein - Chair, Nominating Committee, Dody Goldstein, David Horowitz, Shawn
Frank Paulette Goodman, founder of Washington D.C. chapter of PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization
Kendell, National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Gayle Rubin, lesbian author/activist.
Rosen, founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.
Richter, attorney and homosexual activist.
Bob Kuns, long-time activist in homosexual and Jewish causes.
National Gay & Lesbian Task Force, NGLTF
Board co-chairs: Rachel Rosen and Dave Fleischer, Members - Beth Zemsky, Marsha
C. Botzer, Jeff Levi
NGLTF-Staff Craig Hoffman Director of Training/political training Bill Rubenstein, ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project
Duberman, author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.
Ben Schatz, Executive Director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical
Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk Institute in San Francisco, the world's largest center for homosexual studies.
Schulman, playwright, novelist, and activist, one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian
principal/head of Common Ground, an education/consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation education;
her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations, helping them to implement
domestic partner benefits plans;
co-author of the book Straight
Talk About Gays in the Workplace.
wrote the first openly lesbian novel, "Q.E.D.," in 1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.
Rikki Streicher, (1925-1994), Jew activist and businesswoman.
Michael Goff, founded Out magazine in 1992.
Newman, President and COO of the Gay Financial Network; president and CEO of out.com.
Jim Levin, New York homosexual
Barrett Brick, GLAA
,Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance, Treasurer.
Robin Tyler, comedian, born Arlene Chernick, who was the
first openly homosexual comic in North America;
is also an activist who was the stage producer for the first three homosexual marches on Washington
and the national protest coordinator for the "Stop Dr. Laura" campaign; she produces women's comedy and
and operates a lesbian travel-tour company.
Bruce Voeller, 1935-1994, homosexual rights activist, molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher,
pioneer in the use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide; cofounder and first executive
director of the
National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa
Foundation,an AIDS prevention research organization.
Mark Elderkin, co-founded Gay.com.
Leroy Aarons, American professor, journalist, and founder
National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association
Dr. Donald I. Abrams, American
physician, HIV expert, medical marijuana researcher, and
past president of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.
Abush, (1952-2000), a Canadian archivist of the International Jewish GBLT Archives.
Roberta Achtenberg, civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed
as Assistant Secretary for
Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
former Army Reserves drill sergeant and gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with
the Reserves when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual Veterans Association, GLBVA, in 1990, serving
as its first president.
American gay activist who brought the first domestic partnership lawsuit in
1982 against Southern Pacific Railroad.
Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out Day.
Scott Evertz, President George W. Bush appointed him to serve as the Director
White House Office of National AIDS Policy, ONAP
Kahn, lesbian activist
Larry Kessler, founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action Committee of
Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in New England.
Kathy Levinson, American investor
and philanthropist; serves on the board of Planet-Out; also served on NGLTF Board of Directors.
Light, actress, activist for homosexual causes.
David Mixner, gay activist, political consultant; co-founder
of the Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of wealthy gays
and lesbians who became influential in local politics; president Bill Clinton's Special Liaison to the "Homosexual
Savage, author of gay-themed books, "The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend" and "I Decided to
Go Get Pregnant";
"Skipping Towards Gomorrah:
The Seven Deadly Sins" and "the Pursuit of Happiness in America" and the homosexual themed sex-advice columnist
Susan Schuman, executive vice-president and general manager
of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.
Jason Serinus AKA, Jay Guy Nassberg, founder and coordinator
of the Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the
Gay Liberation Front in New York.
David Sine, CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian
cable TV network.
Rex Wockner, longtime homosexual journalist who has reported news for the
homosexual press since 1985.
Jack Fritscher, Editor in Chief of Drummer homosexual magazine.
Feinberg, trade unionist, transgender activist and author of, "Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan
of Arc to RuPaul".
Allan Ginsburg, dead Jewish poet and leading member of North American Man
Boy Love Association, a male homosexual organization
advances sex between adult males and underage boys
The American Nationalist Association - On the Necessity
of Nationalism and Revisionism
Nationalist Association views positive racial nationalism and objective historical revisionism as central tenets in its overall
purpose. In the past, nationalist-minded individuals and organizations largely refrained from engaging in or championing historical
revisionism, to the detriment of the European-derived peoples of America and around the world. We would like to succinctly
clarify our position on these two fundamental principals of our Association.
First of all, nationalism is healthy, righteous, and absolutely necessary for our peoples' revival, and ultimate
survival. Honoring our ancestors, fostering and championing our culture, history, and heritage, and otherwise being proud
of who we are and where we come from are natural, healthy, and essential instincts all races and ethnic groups must have in
order to preserve, protect, and advance the interests of their nation. Internationalism, multiculturalism, Marxism, and other
perverted and destructive Judeo-Masonic ideologies not only deny nationalism and race, they seek to destroy these concepts
and demonize anyone promoting them.
Recognizing who we are,
where we come from, and what our interests are can only be accomplished through a form of healthy, positive nationalism, one
which respects other races, ethnicities, and cultures, while championing, defending, and honoring our own. Placing one's national
or racial interests at the forefront of their consciousness and activities is a natural, instinctual activity. Our people
have been conditioned to think otherwise.
historical revisionism is an essential aspect of our peoples' revival. For far too long, our collective history and historical
narrative have been distorted, even fabricated in many instances, in a manner which demonizes our people while elevating other
racial or ethnic groups - especially international Jewry. Nationalist-minded organizations and individuals in the past have
been reluctant to challenge the prevailing historical narrative of the 20th century and other major events in more modern
history, including 9/11. We view this as cowardly at best; traitorous at worse. We simply cannot allow our perception of history
and reality, in addition to the legacy of our ancestors, be distorted in such a systematic and deceitful manner.
Our collective history is largely shaped by a total distortion of past events.
The lies concerning National Socialist Germany, the alleged Jewish "Holocaust", and WWII generally form the basic
historical paradigm our people understand the 20th century by, while the falsehoods and fabrications concerning the events
of 9/11 form the basic modern paradigm our people understand the present century. Other distortions of history, in addition
to the basic false paradigms previously described, have led our people to subscribe to a totally manufactured, fabricated,
and ultimately inaccurate version of history that denigrates and slanders our ancestors and peoples. American Nationalists
can no longer cede our collective history and understanding of the world to the deceitful manipulators of public opinion and
the global power elite, who have systematically used fraudulence and deception to advance their global agenda.
That said, the American Nationalist Association views the combination of positive
racial nationalism and objective historical revisionism as essential components of our peoples' revival and ultimate survival,
and will work tirelessly to champion these ideals.
WE MUST ACT
My personal Call for the American Nationalist Association (ANA)
Rodney Martin, Director, World View Foundations WWW.WVFOUNDATIONS.ORG
The American Nationalist Association, (ANA) is a Covenant and is far more than
a hypocritical political party manifesto. It is very precious to us for we regard it as our Covenant with OUR people.
For too long the present system has allowed Non- European-Americans to take our
country for granted and abuse our People and remake our Nation in their image.
We, European- Americans, have forget that we are the most precious people on the world, the term "American Exceptionalism"
applies to our European-American people, we really know this deep down in our hearts. We must realize that if we allow the
current demographic and cultural crisis to continue, White people of European heritage will be international orphans, bereft
of identity, without hope, shunned by all and soon disappear. It is our Race, Culture that are our Priorities. That is why
our Peoples must come first. This why there is an American Nationalist Association.
Today our People and Culture are in danger and it is we who have caused the danger through our follies and foibles
and petty internal disputes.
Because of the current demographic
and cultural crisis, our Race requires her sons and daughters, and mothers and fathers to save it, this is imperative for
each and every one of us.
Everything else is secondary. Our People, Culture and Children's future are in distress.
Nothing else matters, not a person's religion or feelings on superfluous issues.
My dear Comrades and fellow patriots, the time to stand up and be counted has come. There can be no more delays,
no more talk, and no more debate or internet chatter.
has come to "put it on the line" and "take a stand" and commit our blood, sweat and tears, or stand aside
while others do.
We European-Americans and people of European
Heritage come from a historic and honorable heritage and we must honor and restore what has been corrupted and maligned. Our
Race and Culture is our ultimate posterity and it must be cleansed and made true without compromise.
We seek to build our own National Community for OUR People and to strive to make the State more dedicated to OUR
economic, social, and cultural well-being and assure our People's life and liberty will be protected and our children and
their children's children will constantly improve economically, culturally, socially and politically and will enjoy all those
freedoms that are their God-bestowed birthright.
This is where
Unity, Faith and Discipline flows and motivates people to live, fight and die for their Nation, a Nation being a community
of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, or history. The United States is rapidly becoming one
of those States in which its real citizens are unhappy and marginalized and as a result will vanish into that limitless graveyard
where many a state, civilization, empire and superpower lie buried and forgotten.
Citizens become unhappy when the State fails to provide them economic well-being, protect their identity, freedoms
and liberty and make them feel as if they are being deprived of those very rights that they formed the state to protect. Our
People are rapidly losing their stake in the State, thus the United States is rapidly becoming a failed state.
The overwhelming majority of our people are working class, working poor, and poor.
The rich, the powerful and the influential plutocrats, the Jews and other foreign influences abuse and mistreat our people
and use the law to their advantage; its penalties are applied heavily on our people. All of the benefits of the "American
Experience" are now enjoyed by Non-White Non-European-Americans and small Jewish-Marxist elites and their useful idiots
who enjoy them while OUR People wallows in inhuman misery, want and deprivation and stolen identity.
Only these small elites and their "constituencies" benefit from the fruits of the State today. It is now
time to redeem the qualities that made our People great and ensure that all our People shares the fruits of their identity,
freedom, and equitably. This is the least that we owe our People, and owe OWR future generations.
We oppose the present system which is based on self-aggrandizement and megalomania, Marxist political correctness
and White Cultural genocide and overarching influence of a small power elite to only benefit themselves and their and waves
of Third World intruders designed to promulgate the elites political power thus leaving millions of OUR people to a fate of
lost/stolen identity, abject poverty, cultural illiteracy, hunger and hopelessness.
Our call goes out to all those who are frustrated by the current pathetic situation that has infected their Nation
and Culture and want to make a real difference. Our appeal is to people across the broad spectrum of European-American polity
who are fed up with the alarming decline of their People, in all spheres of life, by their loss of culture, identity, prestige,
pride, economic self-sufficiency and confidence.
We invite you
to stop talking and start acting, Join the ANA We invite you to stop reacting and become proactive, Join the ANA We
invite you to reclaim your self-esteem, your Heritage We invite you to turn your dreams into reality. We invite
you to turn idealism into action, Join the ANA We invite you to reject being swept along by the forces of history made
by others and join YOUR people and start making OUR own history. We invite all European-Americans to start forging their
First and foremost, we have to craft a new social
contract, and build our own European-American National Community.
have full faith in the resilience, dynamism and enterprise of our European-American the peoples. By the grace of God, Our
People are endowed with abundant resources and dynamic human resources. There is no reason why we should not be able to stand
on our own feet as a proud, forward looking and thinking National People's Community.
The time has come to act Everything else is secondary..... Nothing else matters. Everything else is superfluous.
Rodney Martin World View Foundations Co-Founder American
Nationalist Association firstname.lastname@example.org
IN MEMORIAL DRESDEN
"Dresden in Flames" Februray 13, 1945
Dresden-Damage Assessment Map-February 1945
By Rodney Martin, World View Foundations This
evening we mark 67 years since British bombers, like a thief in the night and cowards in the dark of night fire bombed the
ancient cultural city of Dresden. A city that February night in 1945 that had no military significance and was filled to capacity
with not only its own residents, but also hundreds of thousands of refugees from eastern Germany, especially the city of Breslau,
which was under siege by the Red Army. Dresden had not previously been targeted for bombing due to its military insignificance
and its status as both a cultural city and a refugee center. The result of the bombing was over 100,000 German NON- Combatants
were incinerated Dresden was city of no military significance, if it was, it would have been bombed in prior Allied air raids.
The dead of Dresden, were these counted?
The decision by the British Bomber Command was nothing more than a War
Crime at the time and something we call today genocide. The bombing itself was a crime, but it was followed by yet an
even more criminal act of cowardice. In the post war years, to cover up the act, the death toll was marginalized and official
German records were deemed "inaccurate" or "Nazi Propaganda". As a result, British and Allied replacement
casualty estimates of 25,000 became the official Dresden death toll, completely disregarding official Missing Persons Lists
that were maintained by the Dresden Police at the time. The German Police reported that individual Germans had listed over
80,000 names of missing family members with a few days of the bombing. Allied white-washers also completely disregarding mathematics,
i.e. the population of Dresden in addition to the tremendous influx of refugees from eastern German provinces, especially
Stacks of the dead in Dresden
Some, 30 years later, Sir Arthur Harris, the Commander of the British
Bomber Command stated, in a recently uncovered interview that "he would bomb Dresden again". This interview, given
in 1977, demonstrates that once a war criminal, always a war criminal. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2276944/I-destroyed-Dresden-Bomber-Harris-unrepentant-German-city-raids-30-years-end-World-War-Two.html
Bomber Command has a statute for this
The bombing of Dresden was a crime, a horrendous crime committed against
defenseless women, children and tired old people who were fleeing the raping horde of Stalin's Red Army. These people were
first incinerated by British Bomber Command, then they were victimized a second time by be purposely stricken from history
as if they never existed by the Allied and their own post war Governments refusal to acknowledgment of their deaths in Dresden
by way of an accurate recording and acknowledgement of the death toll.
This evening we honor all those who died that February evening some
67 years ago and we condemn the murders in the sky and the whitewashers of history.
something else you want to consider, that the bombing happened on Ash Wednesday 67 years ago. I do not believe that it was
not a coincidence, the city was filled with Catholics from Silesia endeavoring to escape the Red Army. When we are blessed
with ashes from the Priest he says " Remember, O man, that thou are dust and unto dust thou shalt return." Unfortunately,
most Catholics are oblivious or choose not to believe that was one of the reason today was chosen.
Regards D from the UK
the German cities were Dresdens, except Heidelberg "Oh Heidelberg du Schoene. Wir wollen dich verschonen, denn wir
werden in dir wohnen. Heidelberg was destined for the American headquarter. Pforzheim was incinerated Feb. 23, l945.
March 5 a low flying airplane machine gunned another 105. My friend Friedl told me that among them was her 12 year
old schoolmate. These people stood in line to get some food at the soup kitchen the city had established. Came spring
and warm weather did the city ever start to stink. I was not there when Pforzheim was bombed. My father moved
to Pforzheim to open his optical shop (l946). He found an intact cellar. I visited him in Pforzheim either in l946 or
47. I lived with his girl friend in Broetzingen. I still remember sitting in the trolley car and how apprehensive
I became from the sickening sweet smell of the decaying bodies. In l945 I lived in the village of Muensterhausen.
which was about 40Km from Augsburg. It was late in winter when we all went outside to see the glow over the woods from the burning city.
Chris (who lived in the Third
While we are continually
bombarded with the so-called Jewish Holocaust of WWII, the events of February 13-14, 1945 that took place in Dresden continue
to be glossed over by western historians and the mainstream media. An accurate investigation of that horrific event indicates
that as many as 500K casualties occured in that 48 hour period, not to mention all the suffering and death in the days and
weeks that followed. Why does the world not seem to care about this? Of course it is because the victims were merely Germans,
the hated enemy, and even though they were unarmed civilians and it was known that Dresden had no military significance. Because
of massive Allied progaganda these deaths and mutilations are merely considered the by-product of war and is not shown as
the true Holocaust that it was. My mother, grandmother and other relatives all fled eastern Germany as the Red Army advanced,
witnessing rape, plunder and death along the way. They never made it as far as Dresden. They are the real Holocaust survivors.
God bless the souls of those slaughtered and may he exact revenge against the psychopathic individuals who carried out this
WHAT WHITE NATIONALISM MUST DO TO "BREAK OUT" By: Rodney Martin, Director, World View Foundations email@example.com WWW.WVFOUNDATIONS.ORG
In military terms, to breakout is to end a siege or encirclement.
Nothing more adequately defines the present status of White Nationalism or Nationalism in the United States than one of being
under "Siege" or "Encirclement". European-American Ethno-Nationalism has been in full retreat since the
1950's when it allowed the integration policies of the Eisenhower Administration. Today, European American Ethno-Nationalism
has been relegated to the internet with its plethora of blogs, internet radio sites, and its ongoing internal disputes which
have only served to provide amusement to the proponents of internationalist multicultalism and Jewry that have for the last
fifty years effectively used miscegenation, pornography, political, legal and economic corruption and the pollution of European
American Culture to create a modern day Weimar America on steroids. Even Christianity has fallen prey to Jewry Christians
attend Church on Sundays only to hear Jewish inspired Christianity that indoctrinates modern day Christians to ignore age
old Christian liturgy in favor of Jewish dogma of the chosen. Modern day Christians long for a Jewishness and ignore Jewish
assaults on the Christ, on the Virgin Mary, on Christian principals and have been told to expunge the Matthew's Gospel.
The United States as a whole is not far demographically from the current
state of affairs in California. In a recent California Dept. of Finance Report released by Gov. Jerry Brown,
it was noted that by 2014, less than 12 months, Hispanics will be the majority in the State.By 2014, according
to the Report, Hispanics will account for 41% of the California population while Whites will drop to 30%. http://californiabriefing.com/2013/02/01/govt-report-hispanics-to-surpass-whites-in-ca-by-2014/...
WHITE NATIONALISM SHOULD CALL FOR AN END
TO "NO FAULT" DIVORCE By: Rodney Martin, Director/Editor World View Foundations
Jews have long used "causes" in their effort to
destroy Western Christian Civilization. Some of the most prominent causes throughout history have been Emancipation, "Civil
Rights", "Feminism", "Gay Rights", "Multiculturalism", "Social Justice" and many
more. Within their cause of "feminism", Jews have successfully destroyed White nuclear families, either by miscegenation
or by the outright destruction of the family itself, i.e. attack the very tradition and institution of marriage by rendering
A primary tool in their
effort was the legal concept of "no-fault divorce". No Fault Divorce was first made law in none other than California
in 1969, and then quickly spread like wildfire as part of the Judeo-liberal agenda to the other States. New York was the last
state to end "traditional " Divorce and replace it with "No Fault" in 2010. The "propaganda"
used to adopt no fault divorce has been entirely anti-male. People were told no fault divorce was imperative so as to protect
women and children from "horrific" marriages and that the sole role of the male in the family unit was one of economics
only. Judeo-liberals offered no forensic evidence or statistics to support this notion. In fact the evidence and results of
their No Fault "solution" has been truly horrific.
No fault divorce ended the respective parties' responsibility to have to prove that a marriage was really and truly
broken; it allowed a spouse who had engaged in adultery to reap all the benefits, economically, of a marriage he or she had
violated in terms of fidelity. In most cases, this has had horrific impacts on the men and children as the intended consequences
played out just as Jews intended, absolute sexual liberation and perversion of White females.
Since the implementation of No-Fault Divorce Laws, the impacts to family and marriage has been catastrophic
80% of no-fault divorces are unilateral meaning that one party to the divorce objects
to the marriage ending and no-fault laws take away that parties control over whether or not they can save their marriage.
More power has been granted to Family Court Judges in deciding issues such custody
and asset splitting and spousal support. When there is no one at fault, a judge's decisions are based on his/her feelings
and feelings are not always objective.
No Fault Divorce takes
away a father's rights to his children because they have no defense against a wife who wants to leave the marriage. Courts
have historically favored mothers and under the no-fault system it is hard to prove a mother unfit to parent.
The idea that marriage is an institution and covenant which is larger than the
two people who make it has been destroyed by no fault divorce laws. Marriage vows and the promise made by spouses to each
other during those vows have lost their value. This is evident in the excessively high divorce rate in the United States which
has now reached near 50%, divorce rates unheard of prior to the adoption of the no fault laws. This is further demonstrated
by the nonsensical examples of "marriages" that last a few days or individuals who have as many marriages as they
have fingers and toes. Of course the Institution of marriage has been further degraded by States that have seen fit to grant
homosexuals licenses to "marry".
No Fault Divorce
has had the effect of lowering a dependent wife's living standards because she no longer has grounds (fault) to argue in her
defense. Husbands can choose to leave her and 75% of the time the courts; unlike with child support will not enforce spousal
support orders. Since the mother more often is granted custody this also means a lower standard of living for the children.
Today, as a result of No Fault Divorce, more and more women
have multiple children from multiple mates, thus creating a diluted, confused and archaic family structure. The Family
Court Systems allegiance was once with the institution of marriage, it is now with the institution of divorce. Family Courts
used to put a great deal of effort into protecting the sanctity of marriage. Now the main concern is to make divorce quick
and easy and get it off the docket and no longer considers the specific facts of each case.
No Fault Divorce laws have had tremendous social consequences. Often women remarry to compensate for the lost companionship
and in so doing cause harm to children, as one Psychiatrist noted, some women take the approach that whoever their present
husband or lover is, is their child(s) daddy, likewise former husbands are driven more and more away from their children,
the result is a diluted, confused and archaic family structure.
According to Judge Randall Hekman, a Family Court Judge and No Fault opponent, it is easier to divorce a wife of
30 years than to fire an employee in the United States today. No fault divorce laws provide no incentive to spouses
who may be in a troubled marriage to make any real effort to save their marriage. In the end, No Fault Divorce Laws have relegated
the institution of Marriage to that of a prolonged date or the proverbial "friends with some legal benefits".
White Nationalism must adopt a series of positions that restores our Culture, Traditions
and Social Norms without compromise. Cornerstone institutions such as marriage and family must be the bedrock of White
Nationalism. We must ceases spinning our wheels on superfluous issues and take on real issues such as the repeal of No Fault
Divorce Laws and replacing Judeo inspired laws with those that rebuild and strengthen our most institutions. White Nationalists
must draw the first battle lines in defense of our women, children and families.
WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS COMMEMORATES THE 80TH
ANNIVERSARY OF THE FIRST NATIONAL SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT January 30, 1933-January 30-2013
A special reading of a Speech given by Adolf Hitler on the anniversary of the National
Socialist victory, given to the German Reichstag on January 30, 1939. The last commemoration before the war.
"Members of the German Reichstag, When six years ago on this evening tens of
thousands of National Socialist fighters marched through the Brandenburg Gate to the light of their torches to express to
me who had just been appointed Chancellor of the Reich, their feeling of overwhelming joy and their vows as faithful followers,
countless anxious eyes all over Germany and in Berlin gazed upon the beginning of a development, the end of which still seemed
unknown and unpredictable. Approximately thirteen million National Socialist voters then supported me. This was a tremendous
number but still only a little over a third of all the votes cast......."Adolf Hitler, German Reichstag,
January 30, 1939
"I do not believe that
I do not foresee wrongly when I say that at a later date, objective, historical writing must recognize
the National Socialist struggle for power as nothing short of an exemplary model that only a nation of the highest cultural standards could achieve." JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, German Foreign
MICHAEL WALSH GRANTS WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS PERMISSION POST HIS WORK
World View Foundations is pleased to announce that it has received approval
from Mr. Michael Walsh to reproduce his outstanding work on our web site.
Mr. Walsh is an outstanding writer and for 45+ years has been committed to historical and intellectual truth. Mr.
Walsh's writings provide excellent analysis corrects the record as to the Third Reich, its leaders and everyday life in the
Be sure to continue to check our web site as we post the
excellent works by Michel Walsh.
THE GHOSTS OF THE EASTERN FRONT
By: Michael Walsh
the Eastern Front, where the fiercest battles of World War 2 took place, grave robbers known as black archaeologists search
for military artefacts. These are then sold throughout Europe and the U.S., which seems to have an inexhaustible appetite
for such macabre souvenirs.
Other than the dangers of unexploded devices and the horror of exhuming human remains
are paranormal events often experienced by researchers. In 1997 six grave robbers drew close to the war ravaged ruins of Makaryevsky
monastery in the Leningradsky region. Noticing what appeared to be a bonfire they approached and were shaken to discover the
inferno was hanging in the air. On their approach it died and disappeared.
that night was broken by human screams coming from the direction of the nearby forest. When dawn broke one of their party
entered the woods where he became disoriented. He returned hours later in filthy clothes with what his companions described
as ‘an insane look on his face.' He never revealed any detail of his experience.
One of the most notorious
of the war related paranormal event zones is to be found in the valley of Myasnoy Bor 30km from Novgorod. Here, during the
1942 Lyuban Offensive the Soviet 2nd Attack Army confronted divisions of the Wehrmacht and Waffen SS which included volunteers
of the Spanish Blue Division.
Galina Pavlova from Engels leads
a search group. She tells of an incident she shared with others in 1997: 'The forests of Myasnoy Bor are scary and mystical.
As soon as you find yourself alone, sounds begin to come from the forest. You can clearly hear yells as if battle still rages.'
War graves explorer, Alexei, used to excavate in the woods near Bryansk where the Red Army was dug in between 1942
and 1943. He says: 'We excavated the bodies of six Russian and 11 German soldiers, four of which were Wehrmacht soldiers,
in a swamp trench shelter.
'We cut the trench logs and discovered decomposed German boots with bones sticking out.
Little by little we dug out remains of four people. It was getting dark. We left the skeletons at the trench and camped on
the meadow 200 metres away.'
GERMAN SPEECH AND SONGS
He told of how later they were woken from their sleep by one of the group who said something weird was going on. 'We got
up and began to listen very carefully. It was unmistakable. We could hear German speech; songs, laughing, and the clatter
of tank tracks. It was very scary.'
He described returning in the morning light to the trench they had been working
on. It was much as they had left it but walking a little further they saw tank ditches and most amazingly, fresh tank tracks.
Another haunted zone is Novokhopersk in the eastern section of Voronezh. Members of an exhibition, led by acclaimed
battlefields archaeologist Genrikh Silanov, took photographs of ghostly uniformed troops near tents.
were baffled by a figure that appeared to be inexplicably wearing Czech uniform. According to their records there were no
Czech units in action on this field of battle.Later they discovered that a Czech unit had integrated with the Red Army. Silanov
believes the pictures are ‘chronal mirages' created by what he calls memory fields connected to dramatic events of the
THE MYTH OF GERMAN CULPABILITY By: Michael Walsh
THE 2nd WORLD WAR? THE SEQUENCE OF AGGRESSION
One of the great mysteries of life is that despite
the evidence to the contrary millions of otherwise intelligent people still believe that Germany was the all powerful aggressor
during the 2nd World War. Nothing better than these myths illustrate the mind-bending power of propaganda. The provable facts
suggest that Germany was the victim and not the perpetrator of naked neighboring aggression. The subsequent allied military
triumph was followed by the triumph of the propagandists whose pressing need was to depict the victor nations as being the
THE BRUTISH EMPIRE
"Germany is too strong. We must destroy her." - Winston Churchill, Nov. 1936.
"In no country has the historical blackout been more intense and effective
than in Great Britain. Here it has been ingeniously christened The Iron Curtain of Discreet Silence. Virtually nothing has
been written to reveal the truth about British responsibility for the Second World War and its disastrous results." -
Harry Elmer Barnes. American Historian
"The war was
not just a matter of the elimination of Fascism in Germany, but rather of obtaining German sales markets." - Winston
Churchill. March, 1946.
"Britain was taking advantage
of the situation to go to war against Germany because the Reich had become too strong and had upset the European balance."
- Ralph F. Keeling, Institute of American Economics
emphasized that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity
to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit." - Samuel Untermeyer, The Public Years, p.347.
On September 2nd 1939 a delegate of the Labour Party met with the British
Foreign Minister Halifax in the lobby of Parliament. 'Do you still have hope?' he asked. 'If you mean hope for war,' answered
Halifax, 'then your hope will be fulfilled tomorrow. ''God be thanked!' replied the representative of the British Labour Party.
- Professor Michael Freund.
"In Britain, Lord Halifax
was reported as being 'redeemed'. He ordered beer. We laughed and joked." - H. Roth. Are We Being Lied To?
"In April, 1939, (four months before the outbreak of war) Ambassador
William C. Bullitt, whom I had known for twenty years, called me to the American Embassy in Paris. The American Ambassador
told me that war had been decided upon. He did not say, nor did I ask, by whom. He let me infer it.
When I said that in the end Germany would be driven into the arms of Soviet Russia
and Bolshevism, the Ambassador replied: "‘what of it? There will not be enough Germans left when the war is over
to be worth bolshevising." - Karl von Wiegand, April, 23rd, 1944, Chicago Herald American
"I felt sorry for the German people. We were planning - and we had the force
to carry out our plans - to obliterate a once mighty nation." - Admiral Daniel Leahy; U.S Ambassador ˆ
MYTH 1. THE GERMAN NATION IS AN AGGRESSIVE NATION
The facts prove otherwise. A Study of War by Prof. Quincy Wright, shows
that in the period from 1480 to 1940 there were 278 wars involving European countries whose percentage participation was as
follows: ENGLAND 28% FRANCE 26% SPAIN 23% RUSSIA 22% AUSTRIA 19% TURKEY 15% POLAND 11% SWEDEN 9% ITALY 9% NETHERLANDS
8% GERMANY (INCLUDING PRUSSIA) 8%, DENMARK 7% Likewise, Pitirim Sorokin, Vol.111, Part.11, Social and Cultural Dynamics,
shows that from the 12th Century to 1925 the percentage of years in which leading European powers have been at war is as follows.
COUNTRY PERCENTAGE OF YEARS AT WAR
SPAIN 67% POLAND 58% ENGLAND 56% FRANCE 50% RUSSIA 46% HOLLAND
44% ITALY 36% GERMANY 28%
therefore, "that Germany has had the smallest and Spain the largest percent of years at war." Of leading modern
European states, England, France and Russia show clearly twice the aggressive tendencies of Germany.
From the years 1815 to 1907 the record stands as follows:
10 wars RUSSIA 7 wars FRANCE 5 wars AUSTRIA 3 wars PRUSSIA-GERMANY 3 wars
GERMANY DID NOT WANT WAR
"I believe now
that Hitler and the German people did not want war. But we declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance
with our principle of balance of power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans' around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleadings
not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right." - Attorney General, Sir. Hartley Shawcross,
"The last thing Hitler wanted was
to produce another great war." - Sir. Basil Liddell Hart
see no reason why this war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices which it will claim. I would like to avert
them." - Adolf Hitler, July, 1940.
agrees: "We entered the war of our own free will, without ourselves being directly assaulted." - Guild Hall Speech,
MYTH.2 THE GERMAN ARMED FORCES OUTNUMBERED
30 Active Divisions 10 Reserve Divisions 12 Large Cavalry Brigades Poland had nearly 2,500,000 trained men available for mobilisations.
FRANCE 110 Divisions 65 were active divisions Including 5 cavalry divisions, two mechanised divisions, one armoured division,
the rest being infantry. On the German borders stood the French command stood 85 Divisions and could mobilise 5,000,000-armed
troops. These were supported backed by five British divisions.
BRITAIN Britain's relatively small but high quality Regular Army was supported by the Territorial Army consisting of 26 Divisions
with plans well in hand to boost this to 55 divisions. This of course was in turn supported by the then world's largest conscription
army holding an empire ‘upon which the sun never set.' The British Empire consisted also of the former German ‘empire'
of New Guinea, Nauru, Western Samoa, South West Africa, Quattar, Palestine, Transjordan, Tanganyika, Iraq, Togoland and the
Cameroons. These territories stolen from Germany added another 1,061,755 square miles to the British Empire, the equivalent
of 35 Scotlands
GERMANY Against these
formidable forces Germany was able to mobilise just ninety-eight divisions of which only fifty-two were active (including
Austrian divisions). Of the remaining 46 divisions only 10 were fit for action on mobilisation and even in these the bulk
of them were raw recruits who had been serving for less than one month. The other 36 divisions consisted mainly of Great
War veterans over the age of forty who were unfamiliar with modern weapons and up to date military techniques.
THE BALANCE SHEET On the balance sheets it can be seen that
the Poles and French alone, not counting Britain and its Empire, had the equivalent of 130 divisions against a total of 98
German divisions of with 1/3rd were virtually untrained men. In terms of trained soldiers the Germans were at an even
bigger disadvantage. (Note at the outbreak of war over 50% of the German armed forces was horse drawn).
WAR IN THE AIR "The superiority of the Luftwaffe has been
greatly exaggerated to create the impression that Britain was the underdog; a David fighting Goliath. In the run up to the
Battle of Britain (August 10th 194) the Luftwaffe had 929 fighters available; mostly single-engine Messerschmitt 109s. Of
these 227 were twin-engine long-range Me110s which had a top speed of 350mph. Although it had a faster rate of climb it was
inferior when turning or manoeuvring. The ME109's range restricted its field of operation. Their real fields of operation
- out and back - was a little over 100 miles, a flight time of barely 95 minutes and a tactical flight time of just 75 minutes.
This was a sever handicap when it is considered that whereas the Luftwaffe pilots were operating scores of miles from their
base, British pilots were often within sight of their own. This handicap was made more critical by the fact that downed RAF
pilots could be rescued whilst Luftwaffe pilots were of course - if they were lucky - imprisoned. The twin-engine ME110
was a slow flyer able to cruise at a little less than 300mph and was easily outpaced by the RAF's Spitfires. It was also ‘sluggish
in acceleration and difficult to manoeuvre.' The greatest handicap for the Germans however was there primitive radio
equipment. Unlike the British versions it was poor in air-to-air operation and could not be controlled by the ground. On the British side a total surpassing 650 fighter aircraft had been amassed by mid-July, mostly Hurricanes and Spitfires
although including nearly 100 of the older types. During that whole year Britain produced 4,238 fighters compared with a derisory
3,000 manufactured by Germany.
In terms of armaments
the noted British military historian, B.H Liddell Hart noted: "What is quite clear, and became evident at the start,
was that the German bombers were too poorly armed to be able to beat off the British fighters without a fighter escort of
their own." - History of the Second World War.
AND OTHER FREE COUNTRIES ATTACKED
out the first acts of aggression. In March 1939 Poland, already occupying German territory ‘acquired' in 1919 invaded
Czechoslovakia. During the months running up to the outbreak of war Polish armed forces repeatedly violated German borders.
On August 31st 1939 Polish irregular armed forces launched a full scale attack on the German border town of Gleiwitz. Within hours Germany retaliated resulting in Britain and France's declarations of war on the German nation on 3rd Sept 1939.
In Britain's case this declaration of war was constitutionally illegal. It was not as it should have been ratified by parliament.
Despite her borders being constantly attacked by the numerically superior armies of France and England, and economically
strangled by world finance, Germany refused to be drawn, negotiated for peace and turned the other cheek for ten months. Only when it accurately learned that England intended to broaden the western front by occupying the Low Countries and Norway,
thus surrounding and threatening Germany's entire borders, did Germany carry out a pre-emptive strike. Germany's defensive
counter attack was launched on 10th May 1940. This resulted in the rout of 330,000 British and French troops by a significantly
smaller army. It was one of the worst debacles in military history. (The British press called it ‘a miracle). Russia
invaded Finland on Nov 30th 1939. Britain (not for the first time) and France invaded Norway's neutrality on 8th April 1940.
To avoid attack via the Baltic Sea Germany counter-attacked. In the small battles that followed (Trondheim) 2,000 German troops
routed 13,000 British troops. They were evacuated on 1st May. To save face Churchill disembarked 20,000 British troops at
Narvik. They were driven out by 2,000 Austrian Alpine troops. Canada declared war on Germany 10th Sept 1939. In June
1940 Soviet Russia invaded Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Rumania. In June 1940. Britain declared war on Finland, Rumania
and Hungary whilst also occupying defenseless Iceland. All of these acts of aggression in gross violation of international
law and previously signed treaties.
On May 10th 1940 in
brazen defiance of international law Britain occupied Iceland. Icelanders regarded the British armed forces as an occupying
force. On 7th Dec 1941 a British backed coup overthrew the Yugoslav government. On 27th March 1941 British troops enter
Greece. On 6th April 1941 Germany retaliated and Britain retreated again. In June 1940 Britain prepares to invade neutral
Portugal. The United States, supposedly neutral, consistently attacks German shipping and arrests or otherwise kidnaps
German citizens, even those living in South American countries. In August 1941. Germany retaliated. in 1940 alone Britain,
supposedly standing alone and at bay, added 1.6 MILLION SQUARE MILES TO ITS WORLD EMPIRE occupying Italian and French colonies;
Syria, Iraq and Persia. Britain's foremost military historian, A.J.P. Taylor conceded: "There can be no doubt that he
(Hitler) broadened the war in 1941 only on preventive grounds." Footnote on casualties: In terms of casualties
the United Kingdom came in at number nine. Russia came first (official figures at 13.6 million, Germany 3.5, China 1.3, Japan
1.3, Romania 350,000, United States 252,000, Italy 279,000, UK 264,000, France 213,000, Hungary 200,000, Poland 123,000, Greece
88,000, Finland 82,000, Canada 37,000, India 24,000, Australia 23,000, Belgium 12,000, Czechoslovakia 10,000, Bulgaria 10,000,
New Zealand 10,000 (another country threatened by Germany no doubt!), Netherlands 8,000, South Africa 6,000, Norway 3,000,
Denmark 1,800, Brazil 943.
A FINAL EPITAPH
FROM ONE OF ENGLAND'S FINEST POETS: "A curse for England, false and base, Where nothing can prosper but
disgrace, Where crushed is each flower's tender form, And decay and corruption feed the worm....... ...............................................Sounds
A Michael Walsh UK News Feature
THE FRENCH PROVE CALIFORNIA IS A FAILED AND CORRUPT STATE
California High Speed Rail Authority proposes to spend $68
Billion for a $34 Billion Project
California is financially, socially,
and morally bankrupt. For years, California, beginning with Jerry Brown's first terms as Governor, has been what I call "an
interesting social experiment", an interesting social experiment that has been an abject failure as demonstrated by its
fiscal, social, and cultural state of affairs today.
is no longer the "Golden State" which the world once envied.
For years, every group and sub-group have been promised and given what they want and welfare became a generational
institution, handed down from one generation to the next. For years Initiatives were passed absent funding sources or realistic
funding sources. It was only thanks to Proposition 13, that California Taxpayers prevented runaway Marxism from effectively
taxing middle class homeowners out of their homes. Today, many City and County Bureaucrats grumble for the repeal of Proposition
13 so that they can expand local government-No Thank You.
many liberals in Washington D.C. and especially Mr. Obama have not learned from the failure of California, as they seek to
replicate the California disaster at the national level.
financial quagmire is structural, its problems cannot be solved by a few cuts here and there, it must be addressed by a fundamental
restructuring of the State's fiscal house and the shedding of the budget busting Initiatives that have proven to be the State's
undoing, i.e. it's time for a State Constitutional Convention and wipe away thirty years of Marxist social experimentation
and welfare dependency.
Despite the state's current, structural
$20 billion deficit, the wise ole swine on Mt. Olympus in Sacramento, in coordination with second coming of Moon Beam the
Great, have decided to commit $8 billion to begin developing a high speed rail project between the great cities of Los Angeles
and San Francisco, presumably so the great minds in these two metropolises, who are responsible for the destruction of the
State can get together more easily. The projected cost, according to the States "High Speed Rail Authority" has
risen from $34 billion, to $43 billion and is now slated to cost California Tax payers, in the expert analysis of the "Authority
a whopping $68 billion.
The question has yet to be asked, where
this initial $8 billion will come from when the State has been consistently short $20 billion to cover its operating budget
for the last 4 years, but we are talking about liberal Sacramento logic. Of course the answer is bond finance, meaning more
debt. At what point do we "debt" ourselves out of existence? What happens if our grandchildren refuse to pay the
debts they had no hand in running up?
In a great economy, a
high speed rail project would be an excellent project, IF managed and planned properly and absent political prostitution.
This has not been the case in California, as usual. California has a habit of electing incompetent officials at the State
and local level based on emotion, rather than reason and we see the results every day, whether it be in Sacramento or City
Hall. Most of these mental midgets know the bankruptcy code far better than the business code.
California crafted a bureaucracy to plan and manage the Project. The State called this the "California High
Speed Rail Authority". This brain trust of government ingenuity first decided on a longer more expensive route through
the interior of the Central Valley without first considering the full costs of construction, right-of-way acquisition and
other budget busters. In fact, the "Authority approved a route which was based on political patronage (prostitution)
rather than sound economics in the interest of the taxpayer. The route approved by the "Authority" is longer and
more expensive than the obvious and most logical route. The "Authority", rather than look to successful entities
and models, in order to save taxpayer funds, the "Authority" hired a New York engineering firm. One would think
it would be far more cost effective and just plain smarter to look to those who have developed high speed rail efficiently
and effectively, i.e. Japan and Europe, but then again, infrastructure Projects such as High Speed Rail in Europe and Japan
are based on the National Interest and not political patronage, thus California would never look to these models, which as
it turns out, it refused to do.
In fact, both Japan and France
showed interest in assisting California. However, business savvy Japan took one look at the "Authority's" plans
and walked away from the project early. Too bad the Japanese did not leave a few Samurai Swords for the "Authority"
to partake in, but that would require honor, a character trait few California officials poses.
The French High Speed Agency (SNCF) made an extensive and prolonged effort to assist California, even going so far
as to submit proposals, analysis and meet with Directors of the "Authority". The French (SNCF) has developed and
operated 1100 miles of track and 800 trains and has carried 115 million people and has consistently made an operating profit
every year, yet the California "High Speed Rail Authority" ignored this successful resource in favor of a New York
engineering firm whose pedigree pale in comparison. Regardless of anti-French jokes, the French do many things right. The
French are unafraid of nuclear energy, they receive a large percentage of their energy from nuclear reactors and are thus
essentially energy independent, while the U.S is not, they led the effort to rid the world of Gaddafi and thus provided justice
for the victims of Pan Am 103, while the British released the terrorist bomber, and their High Speed Rail system, along with
the German system is second to none in Europe.
The French High
Speed Rail Agency (SNCF) was appalled at many aspects of the proposed California High Speed Rail Project. Their criticisms
were outlined in a front page article of the July 9, 2012 Los Angeles Times, hardly a conservative publication. One recommendation
the French made had to do with the route and the excessive cost it added to the project. The French demonstrated that the
route approved by the California "Authority", absent cost analysis. The French stated the State could utilize existing
right-of-way and avoid costly land acquisition and the rout would be quicker and overall the cost using the I-5 route would
be around $38 billion as opposed to the $68 billion proposed by the New York consultant and approved by the California "Authority".
That's right; the "French Plan" would cost California
Taxpayers half the money and result in a more efficient Project.
proposed route of the California High Speed Rail Project was found to be "politically" based thus adding billions
in cost and debt to the California taxpayer. As taxpayers we must ask who stands to gain from what can only be considered
graft on a grand scale. The French suggested a far more cost effective route , which the French demonstrated would clearly
be a faster route, by 20 minutes at least, and far more cost effective, saving California taxpayers some $30 billion in cost,
not to mention interest on the bonds. The French SNCF also suggested that California use competitive bidding, a novel idea,
to partner with an actual operator, i.e. an entity with some real experience so as to "identify a profitable route"
(not a political route), "hold down building costs" (save California taxpayers, after all, California broke), "develop
realistic ridership forecasts" and "attract private investors" (imagine this, Socialist France recommending
a plan to California that calls for private investment, a mortal sin in Sacramento).
California on the other hand, via its "Authority", outsourced all planning to a New York engineering firm.
California refused to even consider any of the ideas or thoughts submitted by the French. Why?
In the end the French SNCF stated that the California High Speed rail Project is not a viable project, and like the
Japanese, walked away, presumably in disgust.
High Speed Rail Project is an example of government graft; corruption and ineptness that makes the infamous "bridge to
nowhere" look minor.
Taxpayers MUST begin to pillory their
Assembly members, State Senators and Governor with questions and threats of recall. The Attorney General must be asked to
The State of California is asking voters to raise
taxes in November to solve its "budget crisis" while at the same time proposing to go deeper into debt to fund a
project it's discredited "Authority" projects to cost $68 billion, when an experienced entity has demonstrated that
the project is laden with inefficiency and excessive cost and could actually be completed for half the projected cost.
The State of California is proposing to spend $30 billion more on a project then
necessary. The State of California is proposing to proceed with a project when it is not economically prudent to do so. The
State of California is proposing to proceed with a project that defies logic, a project that should be based on interstate
planning on the scale of the Interstate Highway System, not intrastate, thus Jerry Brown has created another "space program"
for the State of California. The California High Speed Rail Project is a sure sign of incompetence or corruption or both and
responsible California citizens of all political persuasions must act to stop it.
Werner von Braun in his NASA Office
WERNHER VON BRAUN- THE REAL CAPTAIN AMERICA
CAPT. AMERICA IS COMING
TO THEATRES TO BEAT UP ON THOSE EVIL GERMANS....BUT IT WAS GERMANS WHO CAME TO THE RESCUE OF AMERICA
Rodney Martin, World View Foundations
Another remake is coming to American theaters this weekend; Captain America will
make its way into the hearts in minds of another generation of timid minds as he defeats those evil Germans/Nazis, just like
Indiana Jones and Inglorious Bastards before him. How I yearn for a Superhero that takes on the injustices of the Soviets,
of course Hollywood would never see fit to cast their ideal system in a bad light or see their "Uncle Joe" cast
in anything other than a benevolent light, of course real history proves the opposite is the case. The story that Hollywood
will never tell, OR MOVIE THEY WILL NEVER MAKE, is contrary to the Captain America fables they tell and other fantasy stories.
When the United States was in the depths of defeat in the Space Race, it turned to none other than Germans, German Expertise,
and German technology turned out to be the basis for America's Rocket technology which ultimately defeated the Soviet Union
in the Space Race and put the first man on the moon. Interestingly Hollywood leftists were cheering the Soviets at the time
when they were ahead of the United States, this soon changed when a real Captain America came on the scene. So who is
the REAL CAPTAIN AMERICA...........?
von Braun w/ German High Command-including Grand Admiral Doenitz
Wernher von Braun became the leading figure in the development of
rocket technology in National Socialist Germany then in and in the United States. In 1937, von Braun joined the National
Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP), von Braun was also a member of the Waffen-SS horseback riding school from 1933 and
was commissioned a Sturmbannführer and maintained these memberships until the end of the war, and both Organizations
were banned after 1945. Von Braun was working on his Graduate School doctorate when the National Socialist German Workers
Party (NSDAP) came to power as part of a coalition government in Germany in January of 1933; rocketry immediately became part
of the national agenda. Then Reichswehr, later Wehrmacht Artillery Captain, Walter Dornberger , arranged for Ordnance Department
Research and Development funds for von Braun, who went to work next to Dornberger's solid-fuel rocket test site at Kummersdorf.
von Braun with President Kennedy
Wernher von Braun was awarded a doctorate in physics in1934 from the
University of Berlin. His thesis was titled; "About Combustion Tests" This thesis was only the public portion of
his work. His full thesis, "Construction, Theoretical, and Experimental Solution to the Problem of the Liquid Propellant
Rocket", was kept classified by the army. It was actually not published until 1960, some fifteen years after the end
of World War II. By the end of 1934, von Braun's work group had successfully launched two rockets that rose to heights of
2.2 and 3.5 kilometers. During World War II, von Braun was responsible for Germany's advanced rocket development program.
Von Braun major achievement was the design of the first ever ballistic missile, the V-2 combat rocket which was launched by
Germany in 1944 during World War II.
After the end of World War II, he and key members of his rocket staff
were taken to the United States as part of Operation Paperclip, the American operation to gather key German scientists for
use in the United States before they could be captured by the Soviets. In 1957, the Soviets were clearly ahead of the United
States in Rocket and Space development with its launch of Sputnik 1, the first operational Satellite. United States officials
in late 1957 made the decision to employ von Braun and his German work team's expertise with missiles and tasked them to create
the United States first launch able operational orbital vehicle. Interestingly, Werner von Braun had volunteered to do so
three years earlier in 1954 but had been turned down. Wernher von Braun became an American Citizen in 1955. Wernher von
Braun went on to develop the America's Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM) program, after which his work group was
made part NASA, where he served as director of the Marshall Space Center. Wernher von Braun also served as Chief Architect
of the Saturn V Super booster that propelled the Apollo spacecraft to the Moon.
Wernher von Braun's greatest achievement was his leadership in the
development of the Saturn V booster rocket that made possible the landing of the first men on the Moon in 1969. Werner von
Braun received the National Medal of Science in 1975 and passed away in 1977 of cancer. In addition to the National Medal
of Science from the United States, von Braun was the recipient from Germany of the Knights Cross of the War Merit Cross (1944)
and War Merit Cross First Class with Swords (1943). NASA colleges say of von Braun, "he is without doubt,
the greatest rocket scientist in history." Given his contributions to America and Western Civilization, Wernher
von Braun should be recalled as a true "Captain America"
Please get in touch to offer comments and join our mailing list.
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work posted on WWW.WVFOUNDATIONS.ORG is archived here under fair use without profit or payment for those who have
expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information for personal use, non-profit research and educational purposes
only. Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you have additions or suggestions please contact us.
NOTICE: World View Foundations assumes no liability
regarding 3rd Party linked to web sites, such web sites are linked for informational purposes only.